scholarly journals Cost-Effectiveness and Guidelines for Opioid Substitution Treatment

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (12) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kwakye Peprah ◽  
Hannah Loshak
Keyword(s):  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Methadone Maintenance ◽  
Oral Morphine ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Opioid Use Disorder ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
Opioid Substitution Treatment ◽  
Drug Treatments ◽  
Buccal Tablets ◽  
Injectable Diacetylmorphine

There was evidence indicating that in the treatment of opioid use disorder, injectable hydromorphone, or injectable methadone provided more benefit at less cost compared with injectable diacetylmorphine over a 6-month time horizon. Evidence suggests that in the treatment of opioid use disorder, both injectable hydromorphone and injectable diacetylmorphine are likely to provide more benefit at less cost than methadone maintenance treatment. Treatment with injectable hydromorphone was more cost-effective than injectable diacetylmorphine in opioid use disorder patients who do not respond to or relapse from drug treatments. The evidence is limited because observed data were collected during a short-term follow-up, and long-term cost-effectiveness outcomes were based on extrapolations beyond data from the actual studies. One guideline provided a weak recommendation, supported by low-quality evidence, for using slow-release oral morphine in older adults with adequate renal function in whom buprenorphine and methadone maintenance have been ineffective to treat opioid use disorder or could not be tolerated. Another guideline recommends using injectable hydromorphone or injectable diacetylmorphine for individuals with severe opioid use disorders who relapsed previous treatments failed. No relevant cost-effectiveness evidence or guidelines with recommendations regarding the use of oral hydromorphone, fentanyl patches, or fentanyl buccal tablets for opioid use disorder treatment were identified; therefore, no summary can be provided.

scholarly journals New Approaches in Drug Dependence: Opioids

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juliane Mielau ◽  
Marc Vogel ◽  
Stefan Gutwinski ◽  
Inge Mick
Keyword(s):  
Harm Reduction ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Oral Morphine ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Global Scale ◽  
Adjunctive Treatment ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
Opioid Substitution Treatment ◽  
Drug Policies ◽  
Long Acting

Abstract Purpose of Review This article aims to provide an overview of standard and adjunctive treatment options in opioid dependence in consideration of therapy-refractory courses. The relevance of oral opioid substitution treatment (OST) and measures of harm reduction as well as heroin-assisted therapies are discussed alongside non-pharmacological approaches. Recent Findings Currently, recommendation can be given for OST with methadone, buprenorphine, slow-release oral morphine (SROM), and levomethadone. Heroin-assisted treatment using diamorphine shall be considered as a cost-effective alternative for individuals not responding to the afore-mentioned opioid agonists in order to increase retention and reduce illicit opioid use. The modalities of application and the additional benefits of long-acting formulations of buprenorphine should be sufficiently transferred to clinicians and the eligible patients; simultaneously methods to improve planning of actions and self- management need to be refined. Regarding common primary outcomes in research on opioid treatment, evidence of the effectiveness of adjunctive psychological interventions is scarce. Summary Maintaining a harm reduction approach in the treatment of opioid addiction, a larger range of formulations is available for the prescribers. Embedding the pharmacological, ideally individualized treatment into a holistic, structure-giving concept also requires a reduction of fragmentation of ancillary services available, drug policies, and treatment philosophies on a global scale.

Cost-effectiveness of hydromorphone for severe opioid use disorder: findings from the SALOME randomized clinical trial

Addiction ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 113 (7) ◽  
pp. 1264-1273 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nick Bansback ◽  
Daphne Guh ◽  
Eugenia Oviedo-Joekes ◽  
Suzanne Brissette ◽  
Scott Harrison ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trial ◽  
Opioid Use Disorder ◽  
Opioid Use

scholarly journals Psychosis and Comorbid Opioid Use Disorder: Characteristics and Outcomes in Opioid Substitution Therapy

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachel Lamont ◽  
Tea Rosic ◽  
Nitika Sanger ◽  
Zainab Samaan
Keyword(s):  
Psychotic Disorder ◽  
Psychotic Disorders ◽  
Methadone Maintenance ◽  
Opioid Use Disorder ◽  
Mood Stabilizers ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
Opioid Substitution Therapy ◽  
Group Status ◽  
Urine Drug ◽  
Retention In Treatment

Abstract Background and Objectives Substance use disorders are highly prevalent among individuals with psychotic disorders and are associated with negative outcomes. This study aims to explore differences in characteristics and treatment outcomes for individuals with psychotic disorders when compared with individuals with other nonpsychotic psychiatric disorders enrolled in treatment for opioid use disorder (OUD). Methods Data were collected from a prospective cohort study of 415 individuals enrolled in outpatient methadone maintenance treatment (MMT). Psychiatric comorbidity was assessed using the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview. Participants were followed for 12 months. Participant characteristics associated with having a psychotic disorder versus another nonpsychotic psychiatric disorder were explored by logistic regression analysis. Results Altogether, 37 individuals (9%) with a psychotic disorder were identified. Having a psychotic disorder was associated with less opioid-positive urine drug screens (odds ratio [OR] = 0.97, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.95, 0.99, P = .046). Twelve-month retention in treatment was not associated with psychotic disorder group status (OR = 0.73, 95% CI = 0.3, 1.77, P = .485). Participants with psychotic disorders were more likely to be prescribed antidepressants (OR = 2.12, 95% CI = 1.06, 4.22, P = .033), antipsychotics (OR = 3.57, 95% CI = 1.74, 7.32, P = .001), mood stabilizers (OR = 6.61, 95% CI = 1.51, 28.97, P = .012), and benzodiazepines (OR = 2.22, 95% CI = 1.11, 4.43, P = .024). Discussion and Conclusions This study contributes to the sparse literature on outcomes of individuals with psychotic disorders and OUD-receiving MMT. Rates of retention in treatment and opioid use are encouraging and contrast to the widely held belief that these individuals do more poorly in treatment. Higher rates of coprescription of sedating and QTc-prolonging medications in this group may pose unique safety concerns.

scholarly journals Canadian Guidelines on Opioid Use Disorder Among Older Adults

2020 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 123-134
Author(s):  
Launette M. Rieb ◽  
Zainab Samaan ◽  
Andrea D. Furlan ◽  
Kiran Rabheru ◽  
Sid Feldman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
English Language ◽  
Oral Morphine ◽  
Opioid Use Disorder ◽  
Opioid Overdose ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
Chronic Noncancer Pain ◽  
Assessment And Treatment ◽  
Noncancer Pain ◽  
Health Canada

BackgroundIn Canada, rates of hospital admission from opioid overdose are higher for older adults (≥ 65) than younger adults, and opioid use disorder (OUD) is a growing concern. In response, Health Canada commissioned the Canadian Coalition of Seniors’ Mental Health to create guidelines for the prevention, screening, assessment, and treatment of OUD in older adults.MethodsA systematic review of English language literature from 2008–2018 regarding OUD in adults was conducted. Previously published guidelines were evaluated using AGREE II, and key guidelines updated using ADAPTE method, by drawing on current literature. Recommendations were created and assessed using the GRADE method.ResultsThirty-two recommendations were created. Prevention recommendations: it is key to prioritize non-pharmacological and non-opioid strategies to treat acute and chronic noncancer pain. Assessment recommendations: a comprehensive assessment is important to help discern contributions of other medical conditions. Treatment recommendations: buprenorphine is first line for both withdrawal management and maintenance therapy, while methadone, slow-release oral morphine, or naltrexone can be used as alternatives under certain circumstances; non-pharmacological treatments should be offered as an integrated part of care.ConclusionThese guidelines provide practical and timely clinical recommendations on the prevention, assessment, and treatment of OUD in older adults within the Canadian context.

scholarly journals The association between health conditions and cannabis use in patients with opioid use disorder receiving methadone maintenance treatment

BJPsych Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ieta Shams ◽  
Nitika Sanger ◽  
Meha Bhatt ◽  
Tea Rosic ◽  
Candice Luo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Anxiety Disorders ◽  
Methadone Maintenance Treatment ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Maintenance Treatment ◽  
Methadone Maintenance ◽  
Current Treatment ◽  
Opioid Use Disorder ◽  
Cannabis Use ◽  
Health Conditions ◽  
Opioid Use

Background Cannabis is the most commonly used substance among patients in methadone maintenance treatment (MMT) for opioid use disorder. Current treatment programmes neither screen nor manage cannabis use. The recent legalisation of cannabis in Canada incites consideration into how this may affect the current opioid crisis. Aims Investigate the health status of cannabis users in MMT. Method Patients were recruited from addiction clinics in Ontario, Canada. Regression analyses were used to assess the association between adverse health conditions and cannabis use. Further analyses were used to assess sex differences and heaviness of cannabis use. Results We included 672 patients (49.9% cannabis users). Cannabis users were more likely to consume alcohol (odds ratio 1.46, 95% CI 1.04–2.06, P = 0.029) and have anxiety disorders (odds ratio 1.75, 95% CI 1.02–3.02, P = 0.043), but were less likely to use heroin (odds ratio 0.45, 95% CI 0.24–0.86, P = 0.016). There was no association between cannabis use and pain (odds ratio 0.98, 95% CI 0.94–1.03, P = 0.463). A significant association was seen between alcohol and cannabis use in women (odds ratio 1.79, 95% CI 1.06–3.02, P = 0.028), and anxiety disorders and cannabis use in men (odds ratio 2.59, 95% CI 1.21–5.53, P = 0.014). Heaviness of cannabis use was not associated with health outcomes. Conclusions Our results suggest that cannabis use is common and associated with psychiatric comorbidities and substance use among patients in MMT, advocating for screening of cannabis use in this population. Declaration of interest None.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document