scholarly journals Quasi-coincident observations of polar stratospheric clouds by ground-based lidar and CALIOP at Concordia (Dome C, Antarctica) from 2014 to 2018

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 2165-2178
Author(s):  
Marcel Snels ◽  
Francesco Colao ◽  
Francesco Cairo ◽  
Ilir Shuli ◽  
Andrea Scoccione ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Orthogonal Polarization ◽  
Data Sampling ◽  
Polar Stratospheric Clouds ◽  
Air Masses ◽  
Ground Based Lidar ◽  
Stratospheric Clouds ◽  
Observation Geometry ◽  
The Antarctic ◽  
Seasonal And Interannual Variations ◽  
Good Agreement

Abstract. Polar stratospheric clouds (PSCs) have been observed from 2014 to 2018 from the lidar observatory at the Antarctic Concordia station (Dome C), included as a primary station in the NDACC (Network for Detection of Atmospheric Climate Change). Many of these measurements have been performed in coincidence with overpasses of the satellite-borne CALIOP (Cloud Aerosol Lidar with Orthogonal Polarization) lidar, in order to perform a comparison in terms of PSC detection and composition classification. Good agreement has been obtained, despite intrinsic differences in observation geometry and data sampling. This study reports, to our knowledge, the most extensive comparison of PSC observations by ground-based and satellite-borne lidars. The PSCs observed by the ground-based lidar and CALIOP form a complementary and congruent dataset and allow us to study the seasonal and interannual variations in PSC occurrences at Dome C. Moreover, a strong correlation with the formation temperature of NAT (nitric acid trihydrate), TNAT, calculated from local temperature, pressure, and H2O and HNO3 concentrations is shown. PSCs appear at Dome C at the beginning of June up to 26 km and start to disappear in the second half of August, when the local temperatures start to rise above TNAT. Rare PSC observations in September coincide with colder air masses below 18 km.

scholarly journals Quasi-coincident Observations of Polar Stratospheric Clouds by Ground-based Lidar and CALIOP at Concordia (Dome C, Antarctica) from 2014 to 2018

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcel Snels ◽  
Francesco Colao ◽  
Ilir Shuli ◽  
Andrea Scoccione ◽  
Mauro De Muro ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Orthogonal Polarization ◽  
Data Sampling ◽  
Polar Stratospheric Clouds ◽  
Air Masses ◽  
Ground Based Lidar ◽  
Stratospheric Clouds ◽  
Observation Geometry ◽  
The Antarctic ◽  
Seasonal And Interannual Variations ◽  
Good Agreement

Abstract. Polar stratospheric clouds (PSCs) have been observed from 2014 to 2018 from the lidar observatory at the Antarctic Concordia station (Dome C), included as a primary station in the NDACC (Network for Detection of Atmospheric Climate Change). Many of these measurements have been performed in coincidence with overpasses of the satellite-borne CALIOP (Cloud Aerosol Lidar with Orthogonal Polarization) lidar, in order to perform a comparison in terms of PSC detection and 5 composition classification. Good agreement has been obtained, despite of intrinsic differences in observation geometry and data sampling. This study reports, up to our knowledge, the most extensive comparison of PSC observations by ground-based and satellite-borne lidars. The PSCs observed by the ground-based lidar and CALIOP form a complementary and congruent dataset, and allow to study the seasonal and interannual variations of PSC occurrences at Dome C. Moreover a strong correlation with the formation temperature of NAT (Nitricacidtrihydrate), TNAT, calculated from local temperature, pressure and H2O and HNO3 concentrations is shown. PSCs appear at Dome C at the beginning of June up to 26 km, and start to disappear at the second half of August, when the local temperatures start to rise above TNAT. Rare PSC observations in September coincide with colder air masses below 18 km.

scholarly journals Mountain-wave-induced polar stratospheric clouds and their representation in the global chemistry model ICON-ART

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (12) ◽  
pp. 9515-9543
Author(s):  
Michael Weimer ◽  
Jennifer Buchmüller ◽  
Lars Hoffmann ◽  
Ole Kirner ◽  
Beiping Luo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antarctic Peninsula ◽  
Scale Effects ◽  
Hot Spot ◽  
Orthogonal Polarization ◽  
Polar Stratospheric Clouds ◽  
Mountain Wave ◽  
Mountain Waves ◽  
Stratospheric Clouds ◽  
Wave Induced ◽  
The Antarctic

Abstract. Polar stratospheric clouds (PSCs) are a driver for ozone depletion in the lower polar stratosphere. They provide surface for heterogeneous reactions activating chlorine and bromine reservoir species during the polar night. The large-scale effects of PSCs are represented by means of parameterisations in current global chemistry–climate models, but one process is still a challenge: the representation of PSCs formed locally in conjunction with unresolved mountain waves. In this study, we investigate direct simulations of PSCs formed by mountain waves with the ICOsahedral Nonhydrostatic modelling framework (ICON) with its extension for Aerosols and Reactive Trace gases (ART) including local grid refinements (nesting) with two-way interaction. Here, the nesting is set up around the Antarctic Peninsula, which is a well-known hot spot for the generation of mountain waves in the Southern Hemisphere. We compare our model results with satellite measurements of PSCs from the Cloud-Aerosol Lidar with Orthogonal Polarization (CALIOP) and gravity wave observations of the Atmospheric Infrared Sounder (AIRS). For a mountain wave event from 19 to 29 July 2008 we find similar structures of PSCs as well as a fairly realistic development of the mountain wave between the satellite data and the ICON-ART simulations in the Antarctic Peninsula nest. We compare a global simulation without nesting with the nested configuration to show the benefits of adding the nesting. Although the mountain waves cannot be resolved explicitly at the global resolution used (about 160 km), their effect from the nested regions (about 80 and 40 km) on the global domain is represented. Thus, we show in this study that the ICON-ART model has the potential to bridge the gap between directly resolved mountain-wave-induced PSCs and their representation and effect on chemistry at coarse global resolutions.

On the best locations for ground-based PSC observations

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthias Tesche ◽  
Peggy Achtert ◽  
Michael Pitts
Keyword(s):  
Signal To Noise Ratio ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Orthogonal Polarization ◽  
Microphysical Properties ◽  
Inhibiting Factors ◽  
Comprehensive Picture ◽  
Ground Based Lidar ◽  
Stratospheric Clouds ◽  
The Antarctic ◽  
Lidar Observations

<p>Spaceborne observations of Polar Stratospheric Clouds (PSCs) with the Cloud-Aerosol Lidar with Orthogonal Polarization (CALIOP) aboard the Cloud-Aerosol Lidar and Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observations (CALIPSO) satellite provide a comprehensive picture of the occurrence of Arctic and Antarctic PSCs as well as their microphysical properties. However, advances in understanding PSC microphysics also require measurements with ground-based instruments, which are often superior to CALIOP in terms of, e.g. time resolution, measured parameters, and signal-to-noise ratio. This advantage is balanced by the location of ground-based PSC observations and their dependence on tropospheric cloudiness. CALIPSO observations during the boreal winters from December 2006 to February 2018 and the austral winters 2012 and 2015 are used to assess the effect of tropospheric cloudiness and other measurement-inhibiting factors on the representativeness of ground-based PSC observations with lidar in the Arctic and Antarctic, respectively. Information on tropospheric and stratospheric clouds from the CALIPSO Cloud Profile product (05kmCPro version 4.10) and the PSC mask version 2, respectively, is combined on a profile-by-profile basis to identify conditions under which a ground-based lidar is likely to perform useful measurements for the analysis of PSC occurrence. It is found that the location of a ground-based measurement together with the related tropospheric cloudiness can have a profound impact on the derived PSC statistics and that these findings are rarely in agreement with polar-wide results from CALIOP observations. Considering the current polar research infrastructure, it is concluded that the most suitable sites for the expansion of capabilities for ground-based lidar observations of PSCs are Summit and Villum in the Arctic and Mawson, Troll, and Vostok in the Antarctic.</p>

scholarly journals Location controls the findings of ground-based PSC observations

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthias Tesche ◽  
Peggy Achtert ◽  
Michael C. Pitts
Keyword(s):  
Signal To Noise Ratio ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Orthogonal Polarization ◽  
Microphysical Properties ◽  
Polar Stratospheric Cloud ◽  
Comprehensive Picture ◽  
Ground Based Lidar ◽  
Stratospheric Clouds ◽  
The Antarctic ◽  
Lidar Observations

Abstract. Spaceborne observations of Polar Stratospheric Clouds (PSCs) with the Cloud-Aerosol Lidar with Orthogonal Polarization (CALIOP) aboard the Cloud-Aerosol Lidar and Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observations (CALIPSO) satellite provide a comprehensive picture of the occurrence of Arctic and Antarctic PSCs as well as their microphysical properties. However, advances in understanding PSC microphysics also require measurements with ground-based instruments, which are often superior to CALIOP in terms of, e.g. time resolution, measured parameters, and signal-to-noise ratio. This advantage is balanced by the location of ground-based PSC observations and their dependence on tropospheric cloudiness. CALIPSO observations during the boreal winters from December 2006 to February 2018 and the austral winters 2012 and 2015 are used to assess the representativeness of ground-based PSC observations with lidar in the Arctic and Antarctic, respectively. Information on tropospheric and stratospheric clouds from the CALIPSO Cloud Profile product (05kmCPro version 4.10) and the Polar Stratospheric Cloud (PSC) mask version 2, respectively, is combined on a profile-by-profile basis to identify conditions under which a ground-based lidar is likely to perform useful measurements for the analysis of PSC occurrence. It is found that the location of a ground-based measurement together with the related tropospheric cloudiness can have a profound impact on the derived PSC statistics and that these findings are rarely in agreement with polar-wide results from CALIOP observations. Considering the current polar research infrastructure, it is concluded that the most suitable sites for the expansion of capabilities for ground-based lidar observations of PSCs are Summit and Villum in the Arctic and Concordia, Troll, and Vostok in the Antarctic.

scholarly journals On the best locations for ground-based polar stratospheric cloud (PSC) observations

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 505-516 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthias Tesche ◽  
Peggy Achtert ◽  
Michael C. Pitts
Keyword(s):  
Signal To Noise Ratio ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Orthogonal Polarization ◽  
Microphysical Properties ◽  
Polar Stratospheric Cloud ◽  
Comprehensive Picture ◽  
Ground Based Lidar ◽  
Stratospheric Clouds ◽  
Cloud Mask ◽  
The Antarctic

Abstract. Spaceborne observations of polar stratospheric clouds (PSCs) with the Cloud-Aerosol LIdar with Orthogonal Polarization (CALIOP) aboard the Cloud-Aerosol Lidar and Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observations (CALIPSO) satellite provide a comprehensive picture of the occurrence of Arctic and Antarctic PSCs as well as their microphysical properties. However, advances in understanding PSC microphysics also require measurements with ground-based instruments, which are often superior to CALIOP in terms of, for example, time resolution, measured parameters, and signal-to-noise ratio. This advantage is balanced by the location of ground-based PSC observations and their dependence on tropospheric cloudiness. CALIPSO observations during the boreal winters from December 2006 to February 2018 and the austral winters 2012 and 2015 are used to assess the effect of tropospheric cloudiness and other measurement-inhibiting factors on the representativeness of ground-based PSC observations with lidar in the Arctic and Antarctic, respectively. Information on tropospheric and stratospheric clouds from the CALIPSO Cloud Profile product (05kmCPro version 4.10) and the CALIPSO polar stratospheric cloud mask version 2, respectively, is combined on a profile-by-profile basis to identify conditions under which a ground-based lidar is likely to perform useful measurements for the analysis of PSC occurrence. It is found that the location of a ground-based measurement together with the related tropospheric cloudiness can have a profound impact on the derived PSC statistics and that these findings are rarely in agreement with polewide results from CALIOP observations. Considering the current polar research infrastructure, it is concluded that the most suitable sites for the expansion of capabilities for ground-based lidar observations of PSCs are Summit and Villum in the Arctic and Mawson, Troll, and Vostok in the Antarctic.

scholarly journals Can gravity waves significantly impact PSC occurrence in the Antarctic?

2009 ◽  
Vol 9 (22) ◽  
pp. 8825-8840 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. J. McDonald ◽  
S. E. George ◽  
R. M. Woollands
Keyword(s):  
Antarctic Peninsula ◽  
Gravity Waves ◽  
Clustering Algorithm ◽  
Small Scale ◽  
Temperature Threshold ◽  
Aerosol Extinction ◽  
Polar Stratospheric Clouds ◽  
Mountain Wave ◽  
Stratospheric Clouds ◽  
The Antarctic

Abstract. A combination of POAM III aerosol extinction and CHAMP RO temperature measurements are used to examine the role of atmospheric gravity waves in the formation of Antarctic Polar Stratospheric Clouds (PSCs). POAM III aerosol extinction observations and quality flag information are used to identify Polar Stratospheric Clouds using an unsupervised clustering algorithm. A PSC proxy, derived by thresholding Met Office temperature analyses with the PSC Type Ia formation temperature (TNAT), shows general agreement with the results of the POAM III analysis. However, in June the POAM III observations of PSC are more abundant than expected from temperature threshold crossings in five out of the eight years examined. In addition, September and October PSC identified using temperature thresholding is often significantly higher than that derived from POAM III; this observation probably being due to dehydration and denitrification. Comparison of the Met Office temperature analyses with corresponding CHAMP observations also suggests a small warm bias in the Met Office data in June. However, this bias cannot fully explain the differences observed. Analysis of CHAMP data indicates that temperature perturbations associated with gravity waves may partially explain the enhanced PSC incidence observed in June (relative to the Met Office analyses). For this month, approximately 40% of the temperature threshold crossings observed using CHAMP RO data are associated with small-scale perturbations. Examination of the distribution of temperatures relative to TNAT shows a large proportion of June data to be close to this threshold, potentially enhancing the importance of gravity wave induced temperature perturbations. Inspection of the longitudinal structure of PSC occurrence in June 2005 also shows that regions of enhancement are geographically associated with the Antarctic Peninsula; a known mountain wave "hotspot". The latitudinal variation of POAM III observations means that we only observe this region in June–July, and thus the true pattern of enhanced PSC production may continue operating into later months. The analysis has shown that early in the Antarctic winter stratospheric background temperatures are close to the TNAT threshold (and PSC formation), and are thus sensitive to temperature perturbations associated with mountain wave activity near the Antarctic peninsula (40% of PSC formation). Later in the season, and at latitudes away from the peninsula, temperature perturbations associated with gravity waves contribute to about 15% of the observed PSC (a value which corresponds well to several previous studies). This lower value is likely to be due to colder background temperatures already achieving the TNAT threshold unaided. Additionally, there is a reduction in the magnitude of gravity waves perturbations observed as POAM III samples poleward of the peninsula.

scholarly journals Chemical analysis of refractory stratospheric aerosol particles collected within the arctic vortex and inside polar stratospheric clouds

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Ebert ◽  
Ralf Weigel ◽  
Konrad Kandler ◽  
Gebhard Günther ◽  
Sergej Molleker ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aerosol Particles ◽  
Stratospheric Aerosol ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Late Winter ◽  
General Tendency ◽  
Polar Stratospheric Clouds ◽  
Metal Mixtures ◽  
Air Masses ◽  
Size And Morphology ◽  
Stratospheric Clouds

Abstract. Stratospheric aerosol particles with diameters larger than about 10 nm were collected within the arctic vortex during two polar flight campaigns: RECONCILE in winter 2010 and ESSenCe in winter 2011. Impactors were installed on board of the aircraft M-55 Geophysica, which was operated from Kiruna, Sweden. Flights were performed in a height of up to 21 km and some of the particle samples were taken within distinct polar stratospheric clouds (PSC). The chemical composition, size and morphology of refractory particles were analyzed by scanning electron microscopy and energy-dispersive X-ray microanalysis. During ESSenCe no refractory particles with diameters above 500 nm were sampled. In total 116 small silicate-, Fe-rich-, Pb-rich and aluminum oxide spheres were found. In contrast to ESSenCe early winter, during the late winter RECONCILE mission the air masses were subsiding inside the Arctic winter vortex from upper stratosphere and mesosphere, thus initializing a transport of refractory aerosol particles into the lower stratosphere. During RECONCILE 759 refractory particles with diameters above 500 nm were found consisting of silicates, silicate/carbon mixtures, Fe-rich particles, Ca-rich particles and complex metal mixtures. In the size range below 500 nm additionally the presence of soot was proven. While the data base is still sparse, the general tendency of a lower abundance of refractory particles during PSC events compared to non-PSC situations was observed. The detection of such large refractory particles in the stratosphere, and the fact that these particles were not observed in the particle samples (upper size limit about 5 µm) taken during PSC events, strengthen the hypothesis that such particles are present in the polar stratosphere in late winter and that they can provide a surface for heterogeneous condensation during PSC formation.

scholarly journals Chemical analysis of refractory stratospheric aerosol particles collected within the arctic vortex and inside polar stratospheric clouds

2016 ◽  
Vol 16 (13) ◽  
pp. 8405-8421 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Ebert ◽  
Ralf Weigel ◽  
Konrad Kandler ◽  
Gebhard Günther ◽  
Sergej Molleker ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aerosol Particles ◽  
Stratospheric Aerosol ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Late Winter ◽  
General Tendency ◽  
Polar Stratospheric Clouds ◽  
Metal Mixtures ◽  
Air Masses ◽  
Size And Morphology ◽  
Stratospheric Clouds

Abstract. Stratospheric aerosol particles with diameters larger than about 10 nm were collected within the arctic vortex during two polar flight campaigns: RECONCILE in winter 2010 and ESSenCe in winter 2011. Impactors were installed on board the aircraft M-55 Geophysica, which was operated from Kiruna, Sweden. Flights were performed at a height of up to 21 km and some of the particle samples were taken within distinct polar stratospheric clouds (PSCs). The chemical composition, size and morphology of refractory particles were analyzed by scanning electron microscopy and energy-dispersive X-ray microanalysis. During ESSenCe no refractory particles with diameters above 500 nm were sampled. In total 116 small silicate, Fe-rich, Pb-rich and aluminum oxide spheres were found. In contrast to ESSenCe in early winter, during the late-winter RECONCILE mission the air masses were subsiding inside the Arctic winter vortex from the upper stratosphere and mesosphere, thus initializing a transport of refractory aerosol particles into the lower stratosphere. During RECONCILE, 759 refractory particles with diameters above 500 nm were found consisting of silicates, silicate ∕ carbon mixtures, Fe-rich particles, Ca-rich particles and complex metal mixtures. In the size range below 500 nm the presence of soot was also proven. While the data base is still sparse, the general tendency of a lower abundance of refractory particles during PSC events compared to non-PSC situations was observed. The detection of large refractory particles in the stratosphere, as well as the experimental finding that these particles were not observed in the particle samples (upper size limit ∼  5 µm) taken during PSC events, strengthens the hypothesis that such particles are present in the lower polar stratosphere in late winter and have provided a surface for heterogeneous nucleation during PSC formation.

scholarly journals Depolarization ratio of polar stratospheric clouds in coastal Antarctica: comparison analysis between ground-based Micro Pulse Lidar and space-borne CALIOP observations

2013 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 703-717 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Córdoba-Jabonero ◽  
J. L. Guerrero-Rascado ◽  
D. Toledo ◽  
M. Parrondo ◽  
M. Yela ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Orthogonal Polarization ◽  
Data Sets ◽  
Depolarization Ratio ◽  
Comparison Analysis ◽  
Profile Data ◽  
Polar Stratospheric Clouds ◽  
Ground Track ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Micro Pulse Lidar ◽  
Stratospheric Clouds

Abstract. Polar stratospheric clouds (PSCs) play an important role in polar ozone depletion, since they are involved in diverse ozone destruction processes (chlorine activation, denitrification). The degree of that ozone reduction is depending on the type of PSCs, and hence on their occurrence. Therefore PSC characterization, mainly focused on PSC-type discrimination, is widely demanded. The backscattering (R) and volume linear depolarization (δV) ratios are the parameters usually used in lidar measurements for PSC detection and identification. In this work, an improved version of the standard NASA/Micro Pulse Lidar (MPL-4), which includes a built-in depolarization detection module, has been used for PSC observations above the coastal Antarctic Belgrano II station (Argentina, 77.9° S 34.6° W, 256 m a.s.l.) since 2009. Examination of the MPL-4 δV feature as a suitable index for PSC-type discrimination is based on the analysis of the two-channel data, i.e., the parallel (p-) and perpendicular (s-) polarized MPL signals. This study focuses on the comparison of coincident δV-profiles as obtained from ground-based MPL-4 measurements during three Antarctic winters with those reported from the space-borne lidar CALIOP (Cloud-Aerosol Lidar with Orthogonal Polarization) aboard the CALIPSO (Cloud-Aerosol Lidar and Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observation) satellite in the same period (83 simultaneous cases are analysed for 2009–2011 austral winter times). Three different approaches are considered for the comparison analysis between both lidar profile data sets in order to test the degree of agreement: the correlation coefficient (CC), as a measure of the relationship between both PSC vertical structures; the mean differences together with their root mean square (RMS) values found between data sets; and the percentage differences (BIAS), parameter also used in profiling comparisons between CALIOP and other ground-based lidar systems. All of them are examined as a function of the CALIPSO ground-track distance from the Belgrano II station. Results represent a relatively good agreement between both ground-based MPL-4 and space-borne CALIOP profiles of the volume linear depolarization ratio δV for PSC events, once the MPL-4 depolarization calibration parameters are applied. Discrepancies between CALIOP and MPL-4 profiles in vertical layering structure are enhanced from 20 km up, likely due to a decrease of the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) for both lidar systems at those altitudes. Regarding the results obtained from the mean and the percentage differences found between MPL-4 and CALIOP δV profiles, a predominance of negative values is also observed, indicating a generalized underestimation of the MPL-4 depolarization as compared to that reported by CALIOP. However, absolute differences between those δV-profile data sets are no higher than a 10 ± 11% in average. Moreover, the degree of agreement between both lidar δV data sets is slightly dependent on the CALIPSO ground-track overpass distance from the Belgrano II station. That is, small discrepancies are found when CALIPSO ground-track distance is as close as far from the ground-based station. These results would indicate that MPL-4 depolarization observations would reflect relatively well the PSC field that CALIOP can detect at relatively large distances from the ground-based station. As a consequence, PSC properties can be statistically similar, on average, over large volumes, and hence the present weak disagreement found between both the lidar δV data sets can be likely dominated by small spatial PSC inhomogeneities along the CALIPSO separation from the station. This statement is based on the fact that Belgrano II is a station located well inside the stable Antarctic polar vortex, allowing determined thermodynamic conditions leading to a very low variability in the PSC field, and in their properties.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document