Airborne observations of surface cloud radiative forcing over different surface types of the Arctic Ocean during late summer/early autumn

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sebastian Becker ◽  
Johannes Stapf ◽  
André Ehrlich ◽  
Michael Schäfer ◽  
Manfred Wendisch
Keyword(s):  
Sea Ice ◽  
Radiative Forcing ◽  
Late Summer ◽  
Early Summer ◽  
Open Ocean ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Radiative Energy ◽  
Cloud Radiative Forcing ◽  
Early Autumn ◽  
Sky Conditions

<p>Clouds can cause a significant change to the radiative energy budget of the Earth's surface compared to clear-sky conditions, which is referred to as surface cloud radiative forcing (CRF). The CRF in the Arctic strongly depends on the surface properties (absorbing open ocean vs. strongly reflecting sea ice) and is affected by the low or even absent sun and the special thermodynamic conditions. Therefore, in contrast to the mid and low latitudes, in the Arctic, clouds mostly warm the surface on annual average. However, the CRF will change as the sea ice retreats in a warming climate, which might be accelerated due to the enhanced warming of the Arctic, known as Arctic Amplification. Thus, to quantify the contrast of the CRF over sea ice-covered and sea ice-free ocean surfaces, several airborne campaigns have been conducted in the vicinity of Svalbard in the recent years. The measurements of cloud macrophysical and microphysical properties as well as radiative and turbulent fluxes cover different seasons (spring to early autumn).</p><p>Airborne broadband radiation measurements under all-sky conditions were used to calculate the surface CRF during low-level flight sections. In this study, observations from the concurrent campaigns Multidisciplinary drifting Observatory for the Study of Arctic Climate – Airborne observations in the Central Arctic (MOSAiC-ACA) and MOSAiC-Icebird, conducted in August/September 2020, are presented. First results of the CRF over open ocean and the marginal sea ice zone (MIZ) of late summer/early autumn conditions are assessed and compared to the previous airborne spring and early summer campaigns to analyse the seasonal variability of the CRF.</p>

scholarly journals How important are future marine and shipping aerosol emissions in a warming Arctic summer and autumn?

2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (14) ◽  
pp. 10521-10555 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anina Gilgen ◽  
Wan Ting Katty Huang ◽  
Luisa Ickes ◽  
David Neubauer ◽  
Ulrike Lohmann
Keyword(s):  
Sea Ice ◽  
Radiative Forcing ◽  
Aerosol Particles ◽  
Late Summer ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Ship Emissions ◽  
Early Autumn ◽  
Cloud Radiative Effect ◽  
Aerosol Emissions ◽  
Aerosol Radiative

Abstract. Future sea ice retreat in the Arctic in summer and autumn is expected to affect both natural and anthropogenic aerosol emissions: sea ice acts as a barrier between the ocean and the atmosphere, and reducing it increases dimethyl sulfide and sea salt emissions. Additionally, a decrease in the area and thickness of sea ice could lead to enhanced Arctic ship traffic, for example due to shorter routes of cargo ships. Changes in the emissions of aerosol particles can then influence cloud properties, precipitation, surface albedo, and radiation. Next to changes in aerosol emissions, clouds will also be affected by increases in Arctic temperatures and humidities. In this study, we quantify how future aerosol radiative forcings and cloud radiative effects might change in the Arctic in late summer (July–August) and early autumn (September–October). Simulations were conducted for the years 2004 and 2050 with the global aerosol–climate model ECHAM6-HAM2. For 2050, simulations with and without additional ship emissions in the Arctic were carried out to quantify the impact of these emissions on the Arctic climate. In the future, sea salt as well as dimethyl sulfide emissions and burdens will increase in the Arctic. The increase in cloud condensation nuclei, which is due to changes in aerosol particles and meteorology, will enhance cloud droplet number concentrations over the Arctic Ocean (+10 % in late summer and +29 % in early autumn; in-cloud values averaged between 75 and 90∘ N). Furthermore, both liquid and total water path will increase (+10 % and +8 % in late summer; +34 % and +26 % in early autumn) since the specific humidity will be enhanced due to higher temperatures and the exposure of the ocean's surface. Changes in both aerosol radiative forcings and cloud radiative effects at the top of the atmosphere will not be dominated by the aerosol particles and clouds themselves but by the decrease in surface albedo (and by the increase in surface temperature for the longwave cloud radiative effect in early autumn). Mainly due to the reduction in sea ice, the aerosol radiative forcing will become less positive (decreasing from 0.53 to 0.36 W m−2 in late summer and from 0.15 to 0.11 W m−2 in early autumn). The decrease in sea ice is also mainly responsible for changes in the net cloud radiative effect, which will become more negative in late summer (changing from −36 to −46 W m−2). Therefore, the cooling component of both aerosols and clouds will gain importance in the future. We found that future Arctic ship emissions related to transport and oil and gas extraction (Peters et al., 2011) will not have a large impact on clouds and radiation: changes in aerosols only become significant when we increase these ship emissions by a factor of 10. However, even with 10-fold ship emissions, the net aerosol radiative forcing shows no significant changes. Enhanced black carbon deposition on snow leads to a locally significant but very small increase in radiative forcing over the central Arctic Ocean in early autumn (no significant increase for average between 75 and 90∘ N). Furthermore, the 10-fold higher ship emissions increase the optical thickness and lifetime of clouds in late summer (net cloud radiative effect changing from −48 to −52 W m−2). These aerosol–cloud effects have a considerably larger influence on the radiative forcing than the direct effects of particles (both aerosol particles in the atmosphere and particles deposited on snow). In summary, future ship emissions of aerosols and their precursor gases might have a net cooling effect, which is small compared to other changes in future Arctic climate such as those caused by the decrease in surface albedo.

scholarly journals Radiative energy budget and cloud radiative forcing in the daytime marginal sea ice zone during Arctic spring and summer

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johannes Stapf ◽  
André Ehrlich ◽  
Christof Lüpkes ◽  
Manfred Wendisch
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Sea Ice ◽  
Energy Budget ◽  
Radiative Forcing ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Radiative Energy ◽  
Cloud Radiative Forcing ◽  
Airborne Measurements ◽  
Marginal Sea ◽  
The Impact

Abstract. Airborne measurements of the surface radiative energy budget (REB) collected in the area of the marginal sea ice zone (MIZ) close to Svalbard (Norway) during two campaigns conducted in early spring and and early summer are presented. From the data, the cloud radiative forcing was derived. The analysis is focussed on the impact of changing atmospheric thermodynamic conditions on the REB and on the linkage of sea ice properties and cloud radiative forcing (CRF). The observed two-mode longwave net irradiance frequency distributions above sea ice are compared with measurements from previous studies. The transition of both states (cloudy and cloud-free) from winter towards summer and the associated broadening of the modes is discussed as a function of the seasonal thermodynamic profiles and the surface type. The influence of cold air outbreaks (CAO) and warm air intrusions on the REB is illustrated for several case studies, whereby the source and sink terms of REB in the evolving CAO boundary layer are quantified. Furthermore, the role of thermodynamic profiles and the vertical location of clouds during on-ice flow is illustrated. The sea ice concentration was identified as the main driver of the shortwave cooling by the clouds. The longwave warming of clouds, estimated to about 75 W m−2, seems to be representative for this region, as compared to other studies. Simplified radiative transfer simulations of the frequently observed low-level boundary layer clouds and average thermodynamic profiles represent the observed radiative quantities fairly well. The simulations illustrate the delicate interplay of surface and cloud properties that modify the REB and CRF, and the challenges in quantifying trends in the Arctic REB induced by potential changes of the cloud optical thickness.

scholarly journals Reassessment of shortwave surface cloud radiative forcing in the Arctic: consideration of surface-albedo–cloud interactions

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (16) ◽  
pp. 9895-9914 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johannes Stapf ◽  
André Ehrlich ◽  
Evelyn Jäkel ◽  
Christof Lüpkes ◽  
Manfred Wendisch
Keyword(s):  
Sea Ice ◽  
Radiative Forcing ◽  
Surface Albedo ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Radiative Energy ◽  
Cloud Radiative Forcing ◽  
Airborne Measurements ◽  
Ice Surfaces ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Snow And Ice

Abstract. The concept of cloud radiative forcing (CRF) is commonly applied to quantify the impact of clouds on the surface radiative energy budget (REB). In the Arctic, specific radiative interactions between microphysical and macrophysical properties of clouds and the surface strongly modify the warming or cooling effect of clouds, complicating the estimate of CRF obtained from observations or models. Clouds tend to increase the broadband surface albedo over snow or sea ice surfaces compared to cloud-free conditions. However, this effect is not adequately considered in the derivation of CRF in the Arctic so far. Therefore, we have quantified the effects caused by surface-albedo–cloud interactions over highly reflective snow or sea ice surfaces on the CRF using radiative transfer simulations and below-cloud airborne observations above the heterogeneous springtime marginal sea ice zone (MIZ) during the Arctic CLoud Observations Using airborne measurements during polar Day (ACLOUD) campaign. The impact of a modified surface albedo in the presence of clouds, as compared to cloud-free conditions, and its dependence on cloud optical thickness is found to be relevant for the estimation of the shortwave CRF. A method is proposed to consider this surface albedo effect on CRF estimates by continuously retrieving the cloud-free surface albedo from observations under cloudy conditions, using an available snow and ice albedo parameterization. Using ACLOUD data reveals that the estimated average shortwave cooling by clouds almost doubles over snow- and ice-covered surfaces (−62 W m−2 instead of −32 W m−2), if surface-albedo–cloud interactions are considered. As a result, the observed total (shortwave plus longwave) CRF shifted from a warming effect to an almost neutral one. Concerning the seasonal cycle of the surface albedo, it is demonstrated that this effect enhances shortwave cooling in periods when snow dominates the surface and potentially weakens the cooling by optically thin clouds during the summertime melting season. These findings suggest that the surface-albedo–cloud interaction should be considered in global climate models and in long-term studies to obtain a realistic estimate of the shortwave CRF to quantify the role of clouds in Arctic amplification.

scholarly journals Sensitivity of Arctic sulfate aerosol and clouds to changes in future surface seawater dimethylsulfide concentrations

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (9) ◽  
pp. 6419-6435 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rashed Mahmood ◽  
Knut von Salzen ◽  
Ann-Lise Norman ◽  
Martí Galí ◽  
Maurice Levasseur
Keyword(s):  
Sea Ice ◽  
Radiative Forcing ◽  
Arctic Region ◽  
Sulfate Aerosol ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Surface Seawater ◽  
Cloud Radiative Forcing ◽  
Future Global Warming ◽  
Arctic Surface ◽  
The Arctic Region

Abstract. Dimethylsulfide (DMS), outgassed from ocean waters, plays an important role in the climate system, as it oxidizes to methane sulfonic acid (MSA) and sulfur dioxide (SO2), which can lead to the formation of sulfate aerosol. Newly formed sulfate aerosol resulting from DMS oxidation may grow by condensation of gases, in-cloud oxidation, and coagulation to sizes where they may act as cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) and influence cloud properties. Under future global warming conditions, sea ice in the Arctic region is expected to decline significantly, which may lead to increased emissions of DMS from the open ocean and changes in cloud regimes. In this study we evaluate impacts of DMS on Arctic sulfate aerosol budget, changes in cloud droplet number concentration (CDNC), and cloud radiative forcing in the Arctic region under current and future sea ice conditions using an atmospheric global climate model. Given that future DMS concentrations are highly uncertain, several simulations with different surface seawater DMS concentrations and spatial distributions in the Arctic were performed in order to determine the sensitivity of sulfate aerosol budgets, CDNC, and cloud radiative forcing to Arctic surface seawater DMS concentrations. For any given amount and distribution of Arctic surface seawater DMS, similar amounts of sulfate are produced by oxidation of DMS in 2000 and 2050 despite large increases in DMS emission in the latter period due to sea ice retreat in the simulations. This relatively low sensitivity of sulfate burden is related to enhanced sulfate wet removal by precipitation in 2050. However simulated aerosol nucleation rates are higher in 2050, which results in an overall increase in CDNC and substantially more negative cloud radiative forcing. Thus potential future reductions in sea ice extent may cause cloud albedos to increase, resulting in a negative climate feedback on radiative forcing in the Arctic associated with ocean DMS emissions.

scholarly journals How important are future marine and shipping aerosol emissions in warming Arctic summer and autumn?

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anina Gilgen ◽  
Wan Ting Katty Huang ◽  
Luisa Ickes ◽  
David Neubauer ◽  
Ulrike Lohmann
Keyword(s):  
Sea Ice ◽  
Radiative Forcing ◽  
Surface Albedo ◽  
Aerosol Particles ◽  
Late Summer ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Ship Emissions ◽  
Aerosol Radiative Forcing ◽  
Aerosol Emissions ◽  
Aerosol Radiative

Abstract. Future sea ice retreat in the Arctic in summer and autumn is expected to affect both natural and anthropogenic aerosol emissions: sea ice acts as a barrier between the ocean and the atmosphere, and reducing it increases dimethyl sulphide and sea salt emissions. A decrease in the area and thickness of sea ice could in addition lead to enhanced Arctic ship traffic, e.g. to shorten the paths of cargo ships. Changes in the emissions of aerosol particles can then influence cloud properties, precipitation, surface albedo, and radiation. Next to changes in aerosol particles, clouds will also be affected by increases in Arctic temperatures and humidities. In this study, we quantified how future aerosol radiative forcing, aerosol-cloud interactions, and cloud radiative effects might change in the Arctic in late summer (July/August) and early autumn (September/October). Simulations were conducted for the years 2004 and 2050 with the global aerosol-climate model ECHAM6-HAM2. In 2050, simulations with and without additional ship emissions in the Arctic were carried out to quantify the impact of these emissions on the Arctic climate. We found that aerosol number concentrations in the Arctic will generally increase in the future due to enhanced emissions of sea salt as well as dimethyl sulphide. The increase in cloud condensation nuclei will enhance cloud droplet number concentrations over the Arctic Ocean. Furthermore, both liquid and total water content will increase since the specific humidity will be enhanced due to higher temperatures and the exposure of the ocean's surface. Changes in both aerosol radiative forcings and cloud radiative effects at the top of the atmosphere will not be dominated by the aerosol particles and clouds themselves but by the decrease in surface albedo (and by the increase in surface temperature for the longwave cloud radiative effect). Due to the reduction in sea ice, the aerosol radiative forcing will become less positive and the cloud radiative effect more negative, i.e. the cooling component of both will gain importance in the future. We found that future Arctic ship emissions related to transport and oil/gas extraction (Peters et al., 2011, ACP) will not have a large impact on clouds and radiation: changes in aerosol concentrations only become significant when we increase these ship emissions by a factor of ten. The net aerosol radiative forcing shows only small, non-significant changes. Enhanced black carbon deposition on snow leads to a significant but very small warming over the central Arctic Ocean in early autumn. Furthermore, the tenfold higher ship emissions increase the optical thickness of low clouds and thus induce a small Twomey effect (cooling) in late summer. This Twomey effect has a considerably larger influence on temperature than the direct effect of particles (both aerosol particles in the atmosphere and particles deposited on snow), but it is more uncertain because of the large variability of clouds. In summary, future ship emissions might have a net cooling effect, which is small compared to other changes in future Arctic climate such as those caused by the decrease in surface albedo.

Airborne in-situ observations of Arctic clouds in spring and summer above sea ice and the open ocean

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manuel Moser ◽  
Christiane Voigt ◽  
Valerian Hahn ◽  
Olivier Jourdan ◽  
Christophe Gourbeyre ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sea Ice ◽  
Water Content ◽  
Late Summer ◽  
Open Ocean ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Arctic Clouds ◽  
Cloud Properties ◽  
Cloud Water Content ◽  
Median Volume ◽  
Ice Water

<p>Two airborne campaigns (AFLUX and MOSAiC-ACA) were conducted in spring 2019 and late summer 2020 to investigate low- and midlevel clouds and related atmospheric parameters in the central Arctic. The measurements aim at better understanding the role of Arctic clouds and their interactions with the surface - open ocean or sea ice - in light of amplified climate change in the Arctic.<br>During the campaigns the Basler BT-67 research aircraft Polar 5 based in Svalbard (78.24 N, 15.49 E) equipped with a comprehensive in-situ cloud payload performed in total 24 flights over the Arctic ocean and in the Fram Strait. A combination of size spectrometers (CDP and CAS) and 2-dimensional imaging probes (CIP and PIP) covering the size range of Arctic cloud hydrometeors from 0.5µm to 6.2mm measured the total particle number concentration, the particle size distribution and the median volume diameter. Liquid water content and ice water content were measured with the Nevzorov bulk probe. The cloud water content (liquid and ice water content) from the Nevzorov probe is compared to the cloud water content derived from particle size measurements using consistent mass-dimension relationships.<br>Here we give an overview of the microphysical cloud properties measured in spring and late summer in high northern latitudes at altitudes up to 4 km. We derive the temperature and altitude dependence of liquid, mixed phase and ice cloud properties and investigate their seasonal variability. Differences in cloud properties above the sea ice and the open ocean are examined, supporting the hypothesis of an enhanced median volume diameter over open ocean compared to clouds formed over the sea ice. The comprehensive data set on microphysical cloud properties enhances our understanding of cloud formation and mixed phase cloud processes over the Arctic ocean, it can be used to validate remote sensing retrievals and models and helps to assess the role of clouds for stronger impact of climate change in the Arctic. </p>

Arctic summer sea-ice SAR signatures, melt-season characteristics, and melt-pond fractions

Polar Record ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 33 (185) ◽  
pp. 101-112 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. O. Jeffries ◽  
K. Schwartz ◽  
S. Li
Keyword(s):  
Sea Ice ◽  
Arctic Ocean ◽  
Late Summer ◽  
Beaufort Sea ◽  
Early Summer ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Late Winter ◽  
Melt Pond ◽  
Melt Ponds ◽  
The Arctic Ocean

AbstractVariations in multiyear sea-ice backscatter from the synthetic aperture radar (SAR) aboard the ERS-1 satellite are interpreted in terms of melt-season characteristics (onset of melt in spring and of freeze-up in autumn, and the duration of the snow-decay period, the melt season, and the melt-pond season) from late winter to early autumn 1992 in two regions of the Arctic Ocean: the northeastern Beaufort Sea adjacent to the Queen Elizabeth Islands in the Canadian high Arctic and the western Beaufort Sea north of Alaska. In the northeastern Beaufort Sea, the onset of melt occurs later, and the periods of snow-cover decay and the occurrence of melt ponds are shorter than in the western Beaufort Sea. These melt-season characteristics of each area are consistent with previous observations that the northeastern Beaufort Sea has one of the most severe summer climates in the Arctic Ocean. A model, which assumes that the backscatter from multiyear floes is the sum of backscatter from bare ice and melt ponds, is used to derive the melt-pond fraction during the summer. The results show that melt-pond fractions decrease from an early-summer maximum of about 60% to a late-summer minimum around 10%. The magnitude of the melt-pond fractions and their decline during the summer is consistent with previous, more qualitative data. The SAR model, which gives melt-pond fractions with lower variability and less uncertainty than previous data, offers an improved approach to the reliable estimation of the areal extent of water on ice floes. Suggestions for further improvement of the model include accounting for the consequences of wind-speed variations, summer snowfall, and freeze/thaw cycles and their effects on melt-pond and ice-surface roughness.

scholarly journals Reassessment of the common concept to derive the surface cloud radiative forcing in the Arctic: Consideration of surface albedo – cloud interactions

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johannes Stapf ◽  
André Ehrlich ◽  
Evelyn Jäkel ◽  
Christof Lüpkes ◽  
Manfred Wendisch
Keyword(s):  
Radiative Forcing ◽  
Surface Albedo ◽  
Global Climate Models ◽  
Cooling Effect ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Radiative Energy ◽  
Cloud Radiative Forcing ◽  
Airborne Measurements ◽  
Solar Cooling ◽  
Snow And Ice

Abstract. The concept of cloud radiative forcing (CRF) is commonly used to quantify the warming or cooling effect due to clouds on the radiative energy budget (REB). In the Arctic, radiative interactions between micro- and macrophysical properties of clouds and the surface influence the CRF and complicate its estimate obtained from observations or models. In this study the individual components and processes related to the surface CRF are analysed separately using simulations and measurement from low-level airborne observations of the REB in the heterogeneous springtime marginal sea ice zone (MIZ). The measurements were obtained during the Arctic CLoud Observations Using airborne measurements during polar Day (ACLOUD) campaign. The effect of changing surface albedo, due to the presence of clouds, and its dependence on cloud optical thickness was found to be relevant for the estimation of the solar CRF. A method to correct this albedo effect by retrieving the cloud-free surface albedo from observations under cloudy conditions is proposed. The application of this new concept to ACLOUD data shows, that the estimated average solar cooling effect by clouds almost doubles over snow and ice covered surfaces (−63 W m−2 instead of −33 W m−2), if surface albedo-cloud interactions are considered. Concerning the seasonal cycle of the surface albedo, this effect would potentially enhance solar cooling in periods where cold snow and ice dominate the surface and weaken the cooling by optical thin clouds and surface albedos commonly found during the summertime Arctic melting season. These findings suggest, that the surface albedo-cloud interaction needs to be represented in global climate models and in long-term observations to obtain a realistic estimate of the solar CRF and a reasonable representation of cloud radiative feedback mechanisms in the Arctic and to quantify the role of clouds in Arctic amplification.

scholarly journals Sensitivity of Arctic sulfate aerosol and clouds to changes in future surface seawater dimethylsulfide concentrations

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rashed Mahmood ◽  
Knut von Salzen ◽  
Ann-Lise Norman ◽  
Martí Galí ◽  
Maurice Levasseur
Keyword(s):  
Sea Ice ◽  
Radiative Forcing ◽  
Arctic Region ◽  
Sulfate Aerosol ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Surface Seawater ◽  
Cloud Radiative Forcing ◽  
Future Global Warming ◽  
Arctic Surface ◽  
The Arctic Region

Abstract. Dimethylsulfide (DMS), outgassed from ocean waters, plays an important role in the climate system, as it oxidizes to methane sulfonic acid (MSA) and sulfur dioxide (SO2), which can lead to the formation of sulfate aerosol. Newly formed sulfate aerosol resulting from DMS oxidation may grow by condensation of gases, in-cloud oxidation, and coagulation to sizes where they may act as cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) and influence cloud properties. Under future global warming conditions, sea-ice in the Arctic region is expected to decline significantly, which may lead to increased emissions of DMS from the open ocean and changes in cloud regimes. In this study we evaluate impacts of DMS on Arctic sulfate aerosol budget, changes in cloud droplet number concentration (CDNC), and cloud radiative forcing in the Arctic region under current and future sea ice conditions using an atmospheric global climate model. Given that future DMS concentrations are highly uncertain, several simulations with different surface seawater DMS concentrations and spatial distributions in the Arctic were performed in order to determine the sensitivity of sulfate aerosol budgets, CDNC, and cloud radiative forcing to Arctic surface seawater DMS concentrations. For any given amount and distribution of Arctic surface seawater DMS, similar amounts of sulfate are produced by oxidation of DMS in 2000 and 2050 despite large increases in DMS emission in the latter period due to sea ice retreat in the simulations. This relatively low sensitivity of sulfate burden is related to enhanced sulfate wet removal by precipitation in 2050. However simulated aerosol nucleation rates are higher in 2050, which results in an overall increase in CDNC and substantially more negative cloud radiative forcing. Thus potential future reductions in sea ice extent may cause cloud albedos to increase, resulting in a negative climate feedback on radiative forcing in the Arctic associated with ocean DMS emissions.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document