scholarly journals Gerência do cuidado de enfermagem ao paciente em morte encefálica

2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 1124
Author(s):  
Aline Lima Pestana Magalhães ◽  
Roberta Juliane Tono de Oliveira ◽  
Saulo Fabio Ramos ◽  
Milene Mendes Lobato ◽  
Neide Da Silva Knihs ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Brain Death ◽  
Patient Care ◽  
Organ Donation ◽  
Nursing Care ◽  
Organ Procurement ◽  
Physical Structure ◽  
Structured Interviews ◽  
Recursos Humanos ◽  
Brain Dead ◽  
The Brain

RESUMO Objetivo: compreender a gerência do cuidado de enfermagem aos pacientes em morte encefálica na perspectiva de enfermeiros atuantes no processo de doação e transplantes de órgãos. Método: trata-se de estudo qualitativo, fundamentado na Teoria Fundamentada nos Dados, com 25 enfermeiras. Obtiveram-se os dados por meio de entrevistas semiestruturadas individuais e se empregou a codificação aberta, axial e seletiva para análise dos dados. Resultados: emergiram-se duas categorias a partir da análise dos dados: << Observando as dificuldades relacionadas a gerência do cuidado de enfermagem ao paciente em morte encefálica >> e << Compreendendo as ações realizadas pela equipe de enfermagem na gerência do cuidado ao paciente em morte encefálica >>. Destacaram-se como dificuldades a limitação da estrutura física, recursos humanos e materiais. Enfatizaram-se pelos enfermeiros a monitorização e o suporte hemodinâmico, controle glicêmico e de diurese como ações necessárias para a gerência do cuidado ao paciente em morte encefálica. Conclusão: compreende-se que a gerência do cuidado ao paciente em morte encefálica requer entendimento para além das esferas técnicas sendo necessária a desmistificação do significado da doação de órgãos para manutenção de uma nova vida em outro alguém. Descritores: Obtenção de Tecidos e Órgãos; Transplante de Órgãos; Cuidados de Enfermagem; Cuidados Críticos; Morte Encefálica; Papel do Profissional de Enfermagem.ABSTRACT Objective: to understand the management of Nursing care to patients in brain death from the perspective of nurses working in the process of organ donation and transplants. Method: this is a qualitative study, based on the Data Based Theory, with 25 nurses. The data were obtained through individual semi-structured interviews and the open, axial and selective coding was used for data analysis. Results: two categories emerged from the analysis of the data: "Observing the difficulties related to the management of nursing care to the brain dead patient" and "Understanding the actions performed by the nursing team in the management of the brain dead patient's care. The limitations of physical structure and human and material resources were highlighted as difficulties. Monitoring and hemodynamic support, glycemic control and diuresis as necessary actions for the management of patient care in brain death were emphasized by the nurses. Conclusion: it is understood that the management of patient care in brain death requires understanding beyond the technical spheres, and it is necessary to demystify the meaning of organ donation for the maintenance of a new life in another person. Descriptors: Tissue and Organ Procurement; Organ Transplantation; Nursing Care; Critical Care; Brain Death; Nurse’s Role.RESUMEN Objetivo: comprender la gestión del cuidado de enfermería a los pacientes en muerte encefálica en la perspectiva de enfermeros actuantes en el proceso de donación y trasplantes de órganos. Método: se trata de un estudio cualitativo, fundamentado en la Teoría Fundamentada en los Datos, con 25 enfermeras. Se obtuvieron los datos por medio de entrevistas semiestructuradas individuales y se empleó la codificación abierta, axial y selectiva para análisis de los datos. Resultados: surgieron dos categorías a partir del análisis de los datos: << Observando las dificultades relacionadas a la gestión del cuidado de enfermería al paciente en muerte encefálica >> y << Comprendiendo las acciones realizadas por el equipo de enfermería en la gestión del cuidado al paciente en muerte encefálica >>. Se destacaron como dificultades la limitación de la estructura física, recursos humanos y materiales. Se enfatizaron por los enfermeros el monitoreo y el soporte hemodinámico, control glucémico y de diuresis como acciones necesarias para la gestión del cuidado al paciente en muerte encefálica. Conclusión: se comprende que la gestión del cuidado al paciente en muerte encefálica requiere entendimiento más allá de las esferas técnicas siendo necesaria la desmitificación del significado de la donación de órganos para el mantenimiento de una nueva vida en otro. Descriptores: Obtención de Tejidos y Órganos; Trasplante de Órganos; Atención de Enfermería; Cuidados Críticos; Muerte Encefálica; Rol de la Enfermera.

Organ Donation, Brain Death and the Family: Valid Informed Consent

2015 ◽  
Vol 43 (2) ◽  
pp. 369-382 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana S. Iltis
Keyword(s):  
Informed Consent ◽  
Brain Death ◽  
Organ Donation ◽  
Organ Procurement ◽  
Organ Donor ◽  
Public Understanding ◽  
Organ Procurement Organization ◽  
The Family ◽  
Driver's License ◽  
Brain Dead

In July 2013, parents in Ohio objected to their 21-year-old son becoming an organ donor. Elijah Smith was involved in an accident and pronounced dead using neurological criteria. The organ procurement organization (OPO) went to court and argued that because the young man was brain dead and because his driver's license indicated that he wished to be a donor, the court should allow them to use his organs. The mother argued that her son did not understand what he was signing when he signed his license and that his signature did not reflect an informed decision. The court disagreed with her, saying that he had indicated a wish to donate his organs and that no one but Elijah could revoke that wish. His organs were removed.Elijah's mother suspected that he did not understand what he was signing. She might have been right, given what we know about the process for obtaining permission for organ donation and the limited public understanding of brain death.

scholarly journals Brain death as irreversible loss of a human’s moral status

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 167-178
Author(s):  
Piotr Grzegorz Nowak
Keyword(s):  
Brain Death ◽  
Organ Donation ◽  
Moral Status ◽  
Ordinary Language ◽  
Irreversible Loss ◽  
Life And Death ◽  
Dead Donor Rule ◽  
Biological Meaning ◽  
Brain Dead ◽  
The Brain

Abstract Singer claims that there are two ways of challenging the fact that brain-dead patients, from whom organs are usually retrieved, are in fact biologically alive. By means of the first, the so called dead donor rule may be abandoned, opening the way to lethal organ donation. In the second, it might be posited that terms such as “life” and “death” do not have any primary biological meaning and are applicable to persons instead of organisms. This second possibility permits one to acknowledge that brain-dead patients are deceased because they are irreversibly unconscious. In the commentary which follows, I will argue that Singer’s second option is preferable since it (a) provides a higher amount of organs available for transplant, and (b) is better suited to the meaning of “death” which occurs in ordinary language. I will also defend such a concept of death against the objections raised by Michael Nair-Collins in the article Can the brain-dead be harmed or wronged? On the moral status of brain death and its implications for organ transplantation.

scholarly journals Organ Donation and Declaration of Death: Combined Neurologic and Cardiopulmonary Standards

2019 ◽  
Vol 86 (4) ◽  
pp. 285-296
Author(s):  
Stephen E. Doran ◽  
Joseph M. Vukov
Keyword(s):  
Brain Death ◽  
Organ Donation ◽  
Conflict Of Interest ◽  
Life Support ◽  
Organ Procurement ◽  
Organ Donors ◽  
Neurologic Injury ◽  
Brain Dead ◽  
Moral Certainty ◽  
Death By Neurologic Criteria

Prolonged survival after the declaration of death by neurologic criteria creates ambiguity regarding the validity of this methodology. This ambiguity has perpetuated the debate among secular and nondissenting Catholic authors who question whether the neurologic standards are sufficient for the declaration of death of organ donors. Cardiopulmonary criteria are being increasingly used for organ donors who do not meet brain death standards. However, cardiopulmonary criteria are plagued by conflict of interest issues, arbitrary standards for candidacy, and the lack of standardized protocols for organ procurement. Combining the neurological and cardiopulmonary standards into a single protocol would mitigate the weaknesses of both and provide greater biologic and moral certainty that a donor of unpaired vital organs is indeed dead. Summary: Before a person’s organs can be used for transplantation, he or she must be declared “brain-dead.” However, sometimes when someone is declared brain-dead, that person can be maintained on life-support for days or even weeks. This creates some confusion about whether the person has truly died. For patients who have a severe neurologic injury but are not brain-dead, organ donation can also occur after his or her heart stops beating. However, this protocol is more ambiguous and lacks standardized protocols. We propose that before a person can donate organs, he or she must first be declared brain-dead, and then his or her heart must irreversibly stop beating before organs are taken.

Comparison of 1 vs 2 Brain Death Examinations on Time to Death Pronouncement and Organ Donation

Neurology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 96 (10) ◽  
pp. e1453-e1461
Author(s):  
Panayiotis N. Varelas ◽  
Mohammed Rehman ◽  
Chandan Mehta ◽  
Lisa Louchart ◽  
Lonni Schultz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Brain Death ◽  
Organ Donation ◽  
Brain Function ◽  
Brain Injuries ◽  
Organ Procurement ◽  
Tertiary Hospital ◽  
Consent Rate ◽  
Organ Procurement Organization ◽  
Time To Death ◽  
Elapsed Time

ObjectiveTo fill the evidence gap on the value of a single brain death (SBD) or dual brain death (DBD) examination by providing data on irreversibility of brain function, organ donation consent, and transplantation.MethodsTwelve-year tertiary hospital and organ procurement organization data on brain death (BD) were combined and outcomes, including consent rate for organ donation and organs recovered and transplanted after SBD and DBD, were compared after multiple adjustments for covariates.ResultsA total of 266 patients were declared BD, 122 after SBD and 144 after DBD. Time from event to BD declaration was longer by an average of 20.9 hours after DBD (p = 0.003). Seventy-five (73%) families of patients with SBD and 86 (72%) with DBD consented for organ donation (p = 0.79). The number of BD examinations was not a predictor for consent. No patient regained brain function during the periods following BD. Patients with SBD were more likely to have at least 1 lung transplanted (p = 0.031). The number of organs transplanted was associated with the number of examinations (β coefficient [95% confidence interval] −0.5 [−0.97 to −0.02]; p = 0.044), along with age (for 5-year increase, −0.36 [−0.43 to −0.29]; p < 0.001) and PaO2 level (for 10 mm Hg increase, 0.026 [0.008–0.044]; p = 0.005) and decreased as the elapsed time to BD declaration increased (p = 0.019).ConclusionsA single neurologic examination to determine BD is sufficient in patients with nonanoxic catastrophic brain injuries. A second examination is without additional yield in this group and its delay reduces the number of organs transplanted.

Brain Death and Organ Donation

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas I. Cochrane
Keyword(s):  
Brain Death ◽  
Organ Donation ◽  
Cardiac Death ◽  
Donation After Cardiac Death ◽  
Donation After Brain Death ◽  
Brain Death Determination ◽  
Brain Dead ◽  
American Academy Of Neurology ◽  
Death Determination

Brain death is the state of irreversible loss of the clinical functions of the brain. A patient must meet strict criteria to be declared brain dead. They must have suffered a known and demonstrably irreversible brain injury and must not have a condition that could render neurologic testing unreliable. If the patient meets these criteria, a formal brain death examination can be performed. The three findings in brain death are coma or unresponsiveness, absence of brainstem reflexes, and apnea. Brain death is closely tied to organ donation, because brain-dead patients represent approximately 90% of deceased donors and thus a large majority of donated organs. This review details a definition and overview of brain death, determination of brain death, and controversy over brain death, as well as the types of organ donation (living donation versus deceased donation), donation after brain death, and donation after cardiac death. A figure presents a comparison of organ donation after brain death and after cardiac death, and a table lists the American Academy of Neurology Criteria for Determination of Brain Death. This review contains 1 highly rendered figure, 3 table, and 20 references.

scholarly journals Lived Experiences of Iranian Nurses Caring for Brain Death Organ Donor Patients: Caring as “Halo of Ambiguity and Doubt”

2015 ◽  
Vol 8 (7) ◽  
pp. 281 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zahra Keshtkaran ◽  
Farkhondeh Sharif ◽  
Elham Navab ◽  
Sakineh Gholamzadeh
Keyword(s):  
Brain Death ◽  
Thematic Analysis ◽  
Lived Experiences ◽  
Organ Donor ◽  
Organ Donors ◽  
Structured Interviews ◽  
Supportive Services ◽  
Care Giving ◽  
The Given ◽  
The Brain

<p><strong>BACKGROUND: </strong>Brain death is a concept in which its criteria have been expressed as documentations in Harvard Committee of Brain Death. The various perceptions of caregiver nurses for brain death patients may have effect on the chance of converting potential donors into actual organ donors.</p><p>Objective: The present study has been conducted in order to perceive the experiences of nurses in care-giving to the brain death of organ donor patients.</p><p><strong>METHODS:</strong> This qualitative study was carried out by means of Heidegger’s hermeneutic phenomenology. Eight nurses who have been working in ICU were interviewed. The semi-structured interviews were recorded bya tape-recorder and the given texts were transcribed and the analyses were done by Van-Mannen methodology and (thematic) analysis.</p><p><strong>RESULTS: </strong>One of the foremost themes extracted from this study included ‘Halo of ambiguity and doubt’ that comprised of two sub-themes of ‘having unreasonable hope’ and ‘Conservative acceptance of brain death’. The unreasonable hope included lack of trust (uncertainty) in diagnosis and verification of brain death, passing through denial wall, and avoidance from explicit and direct disclosure of brain death in patients’ family. In this investigation, the nurses were involved in a type of ambiguity and doubt in care-giving to the potentially brain death of organ donor patients, which were also evident in their interaction with patients’ family and for this reason, they did not definitely announce the brain death and so far they hoped for treatment of the given patient. Such confusion and hesitance both caused annoyance of nurses and strengthening the denial of patients’ family to be exposed to death.</p><p><strong>CONCLUSION:</strong> The results of this study reveal the fundamental perceived care-giving of brain death in organ donor patients and led to developing some strategies to improve care-giving and achievement in donation of the given organ and necessity for presentation of educational and supportive services for nurses might become more evident than ever.</p>

Brain Death, Organ Donation, and Transplantation

2018 ◽  
pp. 276-285
Author(s):  
Hilary H. Wang ◽  
David M. Greer
Keyword(s):  
Brain Death ◽  
Organ Donation ◽  
The United States ◽  
Apnea Test ◽  
Unit Management ◽  
Legal Context ◽  
History Of ◽  
Brain Death Determination ◽  
Brain Dead ◽  
Death Determination

This chapter reviews the history of brain death determination, current guidelines for performing the brain death examination including the apnea test, details of apnea testing, the role of brain dead donors in organ donation, physiologic changes seen in brain dead patients, and the relevant challenges in intensive care unit management of such patients for donor organ optimization. The goal of this chapter is to provide clear guidance for a critical care provider to perform an accurate and thorough brain death examination and to further the reader’s understanding of the historical and legal context surrounding brain death and organ donation in the United States.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document