scholarly journals The Effect of Ownership Structure on Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosures

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Soegeng Soetedjo ◽  
Noorlailie Soewarno ◽  
. Iswajuni ◽  
Sabina Ananda Amu
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Social Responsibility ◽  
Social Responsibility ◽  
Ownership Structure ◽  
Corporate Social

scholarly journals Determinant of The Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure

ETIKONOMI ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 161-172
Author(s):  
Uun Sunarsih ◽  
N. Nurhikmah
Keyword(s):  
Regression Analysis ◽  
Corporate Social Responsibility ◽  
Social Responsibility ◽  
Multiple Regression Analysis ◽  
Ownership Structure ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Institutional Ownership ◽  
Manufacturing Companies ◽  
Csr Disclosure ◽  
Corporate Social

Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) has a very important role for the company and now become an obligation for every company. The purpose of this study examined the effect of institutional ownership, board of commissioners, profitability and size on CSR disclosure. This research conducted at mining manufacturing companies listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange period 2013-2014 and obtained 76 sample companies. The method used is multiple regression analysis. The result showed only institutional ownership affecting CSR disclosure. This suggests institutional ownership structure can act in monitoring the company. Independent board has not effected on CSR, it failed to monitor the actions of top management. Profitability has not effected on the disclosure of CSR, it enabled the company to have two perspectives on CSR. The most companies view CSR as a deduction from earnings. CSR disclosure has not affect the size of the CSR disclosure area.DOI: 10.15408/etk.v16i2.5236

Online corporate social responsibility (CSR) disclosure in the banking industry: evidence from Poland

2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (8) ◽  
pp. 1191-1214
Author(s):  
Łukasz Matuszak ◽  
Ewa Różańska
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Social Responsibility ◽  
Social Responsibility ◽  
Ownership Structure ◽  
Community Involvement ◽  
Emerging Market ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Csr Reporting ◽  
Parametric Statistics ◽  
Csr Disclosure ◽  
Corporate Social

Purpose Based on a set of complementary theories, namely, the legitimacy, stakeholder and signaling theories, the purpose of this paper is to investigate the visibility of corporate social responsibility (CSR) disclosures on bank websites. In particular, we explored the accessibility, placement, reporting format, extent and content of online CSR information. This paper also examined the effect of size, being listed, ownership structure and the internationalization of banks on online CSR reporting. Design/methodology/approach A sample consisting of 20 banks was used where the data were manually collected from the websites of various banks during the fourth quarter of 2017. Three reporting formats were explored: information posted directly on the website, information contained in a separate CSR report and information within a management commentary or annual report or integrated report. Content analysis was used to measure the level of online CSR disclosures in four sub-dimensions: environment, human resources, products and customers and community involvement. The sample was grouped according to the criteria of size, being listed, ownership structure and internationality. Non-parametric statistics were used to analyze some factors that influence CSR disclosure, namely, size, public ownership, internationalization and foreign ownership. Findings The results indicate that accessibility to CSR information is relatively good. The placement of CSR information on websites varies among banks. Moreover, community involvement was the most disclosed dimension on the banks’ websites. There was a lack of disclosure on items regarding the environment. Furthermore, the findings of this paper showed that significant determinants for explaining online CSR disclosure level were size and being listed. Originality/value This study contributes to the literature by examining the online CSR disclosure practices of banks from an emerging market with a different socio-economic context and regulations compared to the developed market.

scholarly journals DETERMINAN CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY DISCLOSURE (CSRD) PADA PERUSAHAAN PERTAMBANGAN PERIODE 2014-2018

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 116-131
Author(s):  
Maria Suryaningsih ◽  
Mulia Ningsih
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Social Responsibility ◽  
Social Responsibility ◽  
Ownership Structure ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Institutional Ownership ◽  
Significant Positive Effect ◽  
Ownership Structures ◽  
Mining Companies ◽  
Corporate Social ◽  
Positive Effect

This research has a problem where the company implements corporate social responsibility with the existence of a law, not from awareness. Companies are also not yet aware of the benefits of implementing corporate social responsibility and there are still different previous researchers.This study aims to examine the effect of profitability, leverage, and ownership structure on corporate social responsibility. This study uses data from 15 mining companies listed on the Stock Exchange Index (IDX) during the period 2014 to 2018 using SPSS 24 software. The results showed that profitability had no effect on corporate social responsibility . Leverage has no effect on corporate social responsibility . Ownership Structure has a significant positive effect on corporate social responsibility . That is, high institutional ownership can increase the existence of corporate social responsibility actions and Simultaneously Profitability, Leverage and ownership structures simultaneously have a significant positive effect on corporate social responsibility .

scholarly journals A study on Taiwanese corporate social responsibility and ownership structures

2012 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 111-122 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shihwei Wu ◽  
Fengyi Lin ◽  
Chiaming Wu
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Social Responsibility ◽  
Social Responsibility ◽  
Information Asymmetry ◽  
Ownership Structure ◽  
Family Firms ◽  
Earnings Quality ◽  
Ownership Structures ◽  
Professional Managers ◽  
Corporate Social ◽  
The Relationship

This study develops several models to examine the relationship between the corporate social responsibility (CSR) and the ownership structure of Taiwanese firms. Our results suggest that firms which are controlled by professional managers, government-owned, or collectively-owned would like to undertake serious efforts to integrate the CSR into various aspects of their companies. Due to Asia firm’s culture, family firms might be more reluctant to put efforts on CSR activities. We also report that there is a positive relationship between (a) the CSR and financial performance and (b) the CSR and earnings quality. This study suggests that the ownership structures are found to have effects on the CSR and the CSR could also decrease the information asymmetry between managers and investors.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document