scholarly journals Let It Crash! Energy Equivalent Speed Determination

Author(s):  
Pavlína Moravcová ◽  
Kateřina Bucsuházy ◽  
Martin Bilík ◽  
Michal Belák ◽  
Albert Bradáč
Keyword(s):  
1990 ◽  
Author(s):  
Naresh Patel ◽  
Ajmal Yousuff
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
V.I. Cherniy ◽  
A.I. Denysenko

The purpose of the study is to develop a method of perioperative energy monitoring and to implement it in clinical practice. Material and methods. The study involved 125 patients who underwent various surgical interventions under general anesthesia using sevoflurane (inhalation anesthetics) and fentanyl (narcotic analgesics) in low-flow artificial lung ventilation. Methods of perioperative monitoring (International Standards for a Safe Practice of Anesthesia 2010, WFSA) were supplemented using indirect calorimetry. Results. Analyzing the literature data, a close correlation was found between the energy equivalent of oxygen (EEE2) and the respiratory factor (RQ). The authors obtained the corresponding one-factor linear regression formula, which had the form: EEE2 = 1.157 × RQ + 4,037. Using the basic principles of gas exchange in the lungs of Bohr-Engoff, a method of perioperative energy monitoring was developed, based on indirect calorimetry, taking into account the real values ​​of the energy equivalent of patients' oxygen. The universal formula for determining the level of metabolism of the patient (MR, cal / min) in the form of: MR = [0,863 × VE × (PECO2 / PaCO2) × (FiO2 - FeO2)] (1,157 × RQ + 4,037) where, VE - total ventilation of the lungs per minute (ml / min), PECO2, PaCO2 - partial pressure, respectively, in a mixture of gases, which is exhaled and in the arterial blood (mm Hg). FiO2 and FEO2 are the oxygen fraction in the gas mixture that is inhaled and exhaled in units (% / 100). The method is implemented as a computer program created on the basis of the developed formula. The methods of intensive perioperative therapy taking into account the level of metabolism are presented. Conclusion. The method of perioperative energy monitoring substantially complements the "International Standards for Safe Anesthesiology Practice", WFSA (2010) enhances the perioperative safety of patients by detecting metabolic disorders and conducting appropriate pathogenetic correction.


This chapter applies the ? model to the United States of America. By assuming that the US is a ‘world-system,' we can measure the economic efficiency of each state (and the District of Columbia). The model predicts an output floor based on the inputs of land and people as per-unit energy-equivalents. This expected output is then compared to the actual Gross State Product (GSP) as a per-unit energy-equivalent. States that are economically efficient register a positive residual, and hence a positive ? score. However, given potential measurement inaccuracies, states with low negative scores are also added to this efficient tier.


Perfusion ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 34 (4) ◽  
pp. 297-302
Author(s):  
Anke Dürr ◽  
Andreas Kunert ◽  
Günter Albrecht ◽  
Andreas Liebold ◽  
Markus Hoenicka

Introduction: Pulsatile extracorporeal circulation may improve organ perfusion during cardiac surgery. Some minimally invasive extracorporeal circulation (MiECC) systems allow pulsatile perfusion. The present study investigated the influence of arterial tubing compliance on hemodynamic energy transfer into the patient. Methods: Aortic models with adult human geometry were perfused in a mock circulation. A MiECC system was connected using either high-compliance silicone tubing or standard kit tubing. Energy equivalent pressure (EEP) and surplus hemodynamic energy (SHE) were computed from flow and pressure data. Aortic models with physiological and sub-physiological compliance were tested to assess the influence of the pseudo-patient. Results: Non-pulsatile flow did not generate SHE. SHE during pulsatile flow in the compliant aortic model was significantly higher with kit tubing compared to silicone tubing. Maximum SHE was achieved at 1.6 L/min with kit tubing (7.7% of mean arterial pressure) and with silicone tubing (4.9%). Using the low-compliance aortic model, SHE with kit tubing reached a higher maximum of 14.2% at 1.8 L/min compared to silicone tubing (11.8% at 1.5 L/min). Conclusions: Flexible arterial tubing did not preserve more hemodynamic energy from a pulsatile pump compared to standard kit tubing in a model of adult extracorporeal circulation. The pseudo-patient’s compliance significantly affected the properties of the mock circulation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document