scholarly journals The Contribution of Case Mix, Skill Mix and Care Processes to the Outcomes of Community Hospitals: A Population-Based Observational Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 25
Author(s):  
Davide Pianori ◽  
Kadjo Yves Cedric Adja ◽  
Jacopo Lenzi ◽  
Giulia Pieri ◽  
Andrea Rossi ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Davide Pianori ◽  
Kadjo Yves Cedric Adja ◽  
Jacopo Lenzi ◽  
Giulia Pieri ◽  
Andrea Rossi ◽  
...  

AbstractBackgroundNew organizational models to face the unmet needs of frail patients are needed. Community hospitals (CHs) could foster integration between acute and primary care. The aim of this study was to investigate which patients’ characteristics and which care processes affect clinical outcomes, in order to identify who could benefit the most from CH care.MethodsThis study included all patients aged ≥65 and discharged in 2017 from the 16 CHs of Emilia-Romagna, Italy. Data sources were the regional CH informative system and hospital discharge records. CH skill mix and processes of care were collected with a survey. The study outcome was variation of the Barthel index (BI). We performed a 2-level random-intercept logistic regression analysis, and used the variance partition coefficient (VPC) to quantify the proportion of BI improvement that lay at CH level.ResultsOf the 13 CHs, 8 had a general practitioner medical support model, and 6 had >12 nurses’ working hours/week/bed. Overall, 53% of the patients had a BI improvement ≥10. The patient case mix explained a portion of variability across CHs. Skill mix and processes of care were not associated with BI change.ConclusionsPatients’ characteristics explained part of between-CH variation in BI improvement. Professional skill mix and processes of care, albeit fundamental to achieve appropriate care and respond to the unmet needs of the frail elderly, did not account for differences in CH-specific outcomes.


2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (Supplement_5) ◽  
Author(s):  
J Lenzi ◽  
K Y C Adja ◽  
D Pianori ◽  
C Reno ◽  
M P Fantini

Abstract Background The rapid increase in the proportion of older people underscores the need for new organizational models to face the unmet needs of frail patients with multiple conditions. Community hospitals (CHs) could be a solution to tackle these needs and foster integration between acute and primary care. The aim of this study was to investigate which patients' characteristics and which care processes affect clinical outcomes, in order to identify who could benefit the most from CH care and the best skill mix to deliver in this setting of care. Methods This study included all patients aged ≥65 and discharged in 2017 from the 16 CHs of Emilia-Romagna, northern Italy. Data sources were the regional CH informative system and hospital discharge records. CH skill mix and processes of care were collected with a survey; 3 non-respondent CHs were excluded. The study outcome was in-hospital variation of the Barthel index (BI) (≥10 vs. <10). We performed a 2-level random-intercept logistic regression analysis, and used the variance partition coefficient (VPC) to quantify the proportion of BI improvement that lay at CH level. Results Of the 13 CHs, 7 admitted ≥150 patients, 8 had a general practitioner medical support model, and 6 had >12 nurses' working hours/week/bed. Overall, 53% of the patients had a BI improvement ≥10 (4% to 71% across CHs). The patient case mix (i.e. baseline BI, female, older age, transfer from acute care) explained a portion of variability across CHs, as shown by the VPC that decreased from 0.32 to 0.26. Skill mix and processes of care were not associated with BI change, and the VPC resulting from controlling for these variables was virtually unchanged (0.28). Conclusions Patients' characteristics explained part of between-CH variation in BI improvement. Professional skill mix and processes of care, albeit fundamental to achieve appropriate care and respond to the unmet needs of the frail elderly, did not account for differences in CH-specific outcomes. Key messages A combination of quantitative and qualitative methods might better explain the outcome variability across intermediate care services. Multidisciplinary CH teams and services can be helpful to address the unmet needs of older people, but further studies are necessary.


2017 ◽  
Vol 24 (13) ◽  
pp. 1847-1856 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brenda J. Meyer ◽  
Jim Stevenson ◽  
Edmund J. S. Sonuga-Barke

Objective: To test explanations for the underrecognition of female ADHD by examining differences in adult ratings of boys and girls matched for levels of directly observed ADHD behaviors. Method: In a secondary analysis of a population-based sample, 3- to 4-year-olds ( n = 153, 79 male) and 8- to 9-year-olds ( n = 144, 75 male) were grouped according to levels of directly observed ADHD behaviors (low/moderate/high). Groups were then compared with parent/teacher ADHD ratings. Results: There were no sex differences in levels of directly observed ADHD behaviors within groups. For preschoolers, parents’ ratings of males, but not females, significantly increased across groups—mirroring levels of observed behaviors. For older children, both parent and teacher mean ratings were significantly higher for males than females across groups. Conclusion: Identified differences in adult ratings of males and females matched for directly observed behaviors may contribute to understanding the substantial ADHD underrecognition in females.


BMJ Open ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (5) ◽  
pp. e015080 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aleksandra Polkowska ◽  
Maija Toropainen ◽  
Jukka Ollgren ◽  
Outi Lyytikäinen ◽  
J. Pekka Nuorti

2016 ◽  
Vol 56 (5) ◽  
pp. 849-858 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin Lebwohl ◽  
Abhik Roy ◽  
Armin Alaedini ◽  
Peter H.R. Green ◽  
Jonas F. Ludvigsson

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seilesh Kadambari ◽  
Raphael Goldacre ◽  
Eva Morris ◽  
Michael Goldacre ◽  
Andrew Pollard

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document