scholarly journals Role of Directional Configuration in Deep Brain Stimulation for Essential Tremor: A Single Center Experience

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Venka Veerappan ◽  
Shannon Anderson ◽  
Delaram Safarpour ◽  
Amie L. Hiller
Seizure ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 52 ◽  
pp. 154-161 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seong Hoon Kim ◽  
Sung Chul Lim ◽  
Jiyeon Kim ◽  
Byung-Chul Son ◽  
Kyung Jin Lee ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (9) ◽  
pp. 3044
Author(s):  
Hye Ran Park ◽  
Yong Hoon Lim ◽  
Eun Jin Song ◽  
Jae Meen Lee ◽  
Kawngwoo Park ◽  
...  

Bilateral subthalamic nucleus (STN) Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a well-established treatment in patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD). Traditionally, STN DBS for PD is performed by using microelectrode recording (MER) and/or intraoperative macrostimulation under local anesthesia (LA). However, many patients cannot tolerate the long operation time under LA without medication. In addition, it cannot be even be performed on PD patients with poor physical and neurological condition. Recently, it has been reported that STN DBS under general anesthesia (GA) can be successfully performed due to the feasible MER under GA, as well as the technical advancement in direct targeting and intraoperative imaging. The authors reviewed the previously published literature on STN DBS under GA using intraoperative imaging and MER, focused on discussing the technique, clinical outcome, and the complication, as well as introducing our single-center experience. Based on the reports of previously published studies and ours, GA did not interfere with the MER signal from STN. STN DBS under GA without intraoperative stimulation shows similar or better clinical outcome without any additional complication compared to STN DBS under LA. Long-term follow-up with a large number of the patients would be necessary to validate the safety and efficacy of STN DBS under GA.


2020 ◽  
Vol 37 (4) ◽  
pp. 208
Author(s):  
Vural Hamzaoğlu ◽  
Hakan Özalp ◽  
Okan Doğu ◽  
Nevra Öksüz ◽  
Sabri Aydın ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 114 ◽  
pp. e992-e1001 ◽  
Author(s):  
Javier Lobato-Polo ◽  
Daniel Ospina-Delgado ◽  
Eduardo Orrego-González ◽  
Juan F. Gómez-Castro ◽  
Jorge L. Orozco ◽  
...  

PLoS ONE ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (12) ◽  
pp. e0145623 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masa-aki Higuchi ◽  
Dan D. Topiol ◽  
Bilal Ahmed ◽  
Hokuto Morita ◽  
Samuel Carbunaru ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 90 (6) ◽  
pp. 394-400 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tatiana H. de Oliveira ◽  
Matthew R. Ginsberg ◽  
Scott Cooper ◽  
Amy Nowacki ◽  
Ali Rezai ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 046005 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maureen Keane ◽  
Steve Deyo ◽  
Aviva Abosch ◽  
Jawad A Bajwa ◽  
Matthew D Johnson

Cephalalgia ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 36 (12) ◽  
pp. 1143-1148 ◽  
Author(s):  
Massimo Leone ◽  
Alberto Proietti Cecchini

Background: Deep brain stimulation of the posterior hypothalamic area was first introduced in 2000 to treat drug-refractory chronic cluster headache (CH). Findings: So far, hypothalamic stimulation has been employed in 79 patients suffering from various forms of intractable short-lasting unilateral headache forms, mainly trigeminal autonomic cephalalgias. The majority were (88.6%) chronic CH, including one patient who suffered from symptomatic chronic CH-like attacks; the remaining were short-lasting unilateral neuralgiform headache attacks with conjunctival injection and tearing (SUNCT), one had paroxysmal hemicranias and one symptomatic trigeminal neuralgia. Overall, after a mean follow up of 2.2 years, 69.6% (55) hypothalamic-stimulated patients showed a ≥50% improvement. Conclusions: These observations need confirmation in randomised, controlled trials. A key role of the posterior hypothalamic area in the pathophysiology of unilateral short-lasting headaches, possibly by regulating the duration rather than triggering the attacks, can be hypothesised. Because of its invasiveness, hypothalamic stimulation can be proposed only after other, less-invasive, neurostimulation procedures have been tried.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document