Invasive Device-Related Nosocomial Infection Surveillance in Intensive Care Unit

2012 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 438-443 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zafer ÇUKUROVA ◽  
Bülent DURDU ◽  
Oya HERGÜNSEL ◽  
Gülay EREN ◽  
Yasemin TEKDÖŞ ◽  
...  
2013 ◽  
Vol 83 (3) ◽  
pp. 196-199 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Abdel-Wahab ◽  
M. Ghoneim ◽  
M. Khashaba ◽  
A.-H. El-Gilany ◽  
D. Abdel-Hady

2001 ◽  
Vol 22 (03) ◽  
pp. 132-133 ◽  
Author(s):  
Federico Pallavicini ◽  
Mariano Alberto Pennisi ◽  
Immacolata Izzi ◽  
Adriana Ammassari ◽  
Paolo Mazzini ◽  
...  

2002 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 127-132 ◽  
Author(s):  
Klaus Weist ◽  
Kathrin Pollege ◽  
Ines Schulz ◽  
Henning Rüden ◽  
Petra Gastmeier

Objective:To determine the percentage of cross-transmissions in an intensive care unit (ICU) with high nosocomial infection (NI) rates according to the data of the German Nosocomial Infection Surveillance System.Setting:A 14-bed surgical ICU of a 1,300-bed, tertiary-care teaching hospital.Method:Prospective surveillance of NIs during a period of 9 months. If an NI was present, the isolates of the following indicator pathogens were stored and typed by species:Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus species, Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter baumannii, and Enterobacterspecies. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis was performed for typing ofS. aureusstrains and arbitrarily primed polymerase chain reaction was applied for the other pathogens. The presence of two indistinguishable strains in two patients was considered as one episode of cross-transmission.Results:Two hundred sixty-two patients were observed during a period of 2,444 patient-days; 96 NIs were identified in 59 patients and the overall incidence density of NI was 39.3 per 1,000 patient-days. For 104 isolates, it was possible to consider typing results. Altogether, 36 cross-transmissions have lead to NIs in other patients. That means at least 37.5% of all NIs identified were due to cross-transmissions.Conclusion:Because of the method of this study, the percentage of NIs due to cross-transmission identified for this ICU is an “at least number”. In reality, the number of cross-transmissions, and thus the number of avoidable infections, may have been even higher. However, it is difficult to assess whether the percentage of NIs due to cross-transmission determined for this ICU may be the crucial explanation for the relatively high infection rate in comparison to other surgical ICUs.


Author(s):  
Danielle Lopes de Alencar ◽  
Adriana Da Silva Conceição ◽  
Renata Flávia Abreu da Silva

Introduction: Health care-associated infections stand out in scientific investigations for being related to increased length of stay as well as to morbidity and mortality rates, of hospitalized patients, especially in intensive care units. The study aims to profile the occurrence of invasive device-associated infections in an intensive care unit of a public hospital in Rio de Janeiro. Outline: Descriptive, documentary study with data collected in 2018 through form including patients hospitalized in 2016. For univariate analysis, Kaplan–Meier estimate and Longrank test with value p <0.05% were used. Results: 181 predominantly male patients (53.59%) ≥ 60 years (37.57%). Indwelling urinary catheter was the most used device although the highest percentage of infection was with invasive mechanical ventilation. The nosocomial infection rate was 28.73% predominantly in respiratory tract (56.91%). Implications: There was an association between nosocomial infection and the use of invasive devices investigated in the study, considering that the time of use was the most related factor.


1998 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 162-164 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. A. R. Webb ◽  
B. Roberts ◽  
F. X. Breheny ◽  
C. L. Golledge ◽  
P. D. Cameron ◽  
...  

Epidemics of bacteraemia and wound infection have been associated with the infusion of bacterially contaminated propofol administered during anaesthesia. We conducted an observational study to determine the incidence and clinical significance of administration of potentially contaminated propofol to patients in an ICU setting. One hundred patients received a total of 302 infusions of propofol. Eighteen episodes of possible contamination of propofol syringes were identified, but in all cases contamination was by a low-grade virulence pathogen. There were no episodes of clinical infection or colonization which could be attributed to the administration of contaminated propofol. During the routine use of propofol to provide sedation in ICU patients the risk of nosocomial infection secondary to contamination of propofol is extremely low.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document