scholarly journals Catch Rates with Variable Strength Circle Hooks in the Hawaii-Based Tuna Longline Fishery

2012 ◽  
Vol 88 (3) ◽  
pp. 425-447 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keith A Bigelow ◽  
David W Kerstetter ◽  
Matthew G Dancho ◽  
Jamie A Marchetti
2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vanessa Jaiteh ◽  
Tom Peatman ◽  
Steve Lindfield ◽  
Eric Gilman ◽  
Simon Nicol

Bycatch on pelagic tuna longlines has contributed to population declines in several far-ranging, oceanic species and presents a conservation challenge that area-based management tools are increasingly promoted to address. In January 2020 the Republic of Palau, concerned about the impacts of longline fishing in its waters, closed 80% of its exclusive economic zone to all extractive activities, reserving the remaining 20% for a domestic fishing zone (DFZ). One of a growing number of very large marine protected areas, the Palau National Marine Sanctuary (PNMS) spans ∼500,000 km2 and was established inter alia to allow for the recovery of fish stocks adversely impacted by tuna longline fleets. Given that the main tuna stocks targeted in the western Pacific are not overexploited, the benefits of protection potentially afforded by the sanctuary are likely greater for vulnerable bycatch species. Evaluations of the sanctuary’s performance require, in part, a baseline of historical catch rates and effort distribution in the distant-water fleet (DWF) and locally based fleet (LBF) operating in Palau prior to sanctuary implementation. We describe the fishing effort, catch rates, catch estimates and fishing mortality in Palau’s longline fishery based on logbook, observer and electronic monitoring data. We defined bycatch as any species, retained or discarded, other than targeted tunas. Between 2010 and 2020, 104.8 million hooks were deployed, catching over 2 million individuals from 117 taxa at an overall target:bycatch ratio of 1:1, with a retention rate of ∼62%. Pronounced differences in fishing strategies and spatial distribution of effort between fleets were associated with large variations in catch rates and composition. The LBF had a larger effect on populations of at-risk species relative to the DWF, with higher catch rates and magnitudes for several vulnerable species and higher observable fishing mortality rates (64% vs 50% in the DWF). The sanctuary reshaped Palau’s longline fishery, contracting the fishery’s area and capacity. The relocation of the DFZ eliminated the LBF and constrained the DWF to an area where the fleet’s total catch rates and those of a number of vulnerable species were historically lower relative to former fishing grounds now closed by the sanctuary. Our results highlight the importance of consistent bycatch monitoring and emphasize the need for regional area-based approaches for managing longline fisheries.


2013 ◽  
Vol 143 ◽  
pp. 136-142 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mariana Travassos Tolotti ◽  
Paulo Travassos ◽  
Flávia Lucena Frédou ◽  
Catarina Wor ◽  
Humber Agrelli Andrade ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 65 (11) ◽  
pp. 1035 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. P. Veras ◽  
F. H. V. Hazin ◽  
I. S. L. Branco ◽  
M. T. Tolotti ◽  
G. H. Burgess

From October 2005 to March 2010, a total of 480 pelagic stingray, Pteroplatytrygon violacea, specimens, 188 females and 292 males (0.64 female : 1 male), were taken in the equatorial and south-western Atlantic by the commercial tuna longline fishery and their reproductive biology was studied. Disc widths (DW) ranged from 28.0 to 66.0 cm for females and from 34.0 to 59.6 cm for males. Size at first sexual maturity was estimated at ~48.0 cm DW (first pregnant female) for females and ~41.0 cm DW for males. Ovarian fecundity, considering only follicles larger than 0.5 cm in diameter, ranged from 1 to 17 follicles per female, while the uterine fecundity of embryos in pregnant females in Stages 2 and 3 ranged from 1 to 5 embryos per female. The sex ratio between the embryos was almost equal (1.08 female : 1 male) and the size at birth was 19.0 cm DW.


2015 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 301-307 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. V. Aneesh Kumar ◽  
P. Pravin ◽  
B. Meenakumari ◽  
P. S. Khanolkar ◽  
M. V. Baiju

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document