Advanced Use of Borehole Acoustic Televiewer (ATV) for Structural Interpretation of Unconformity-Related Uranium Deposits

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonio Benedicto ◽  
Grant Harrison ◽  
Brandon Eccles ◽  
Patrick Ledru
Keyword(s):  
Fault Reactivation ◽  
Added Value ◽  
Reverse Fault ◽  
Uranium Deposits ◽  
Athabasca Basin ◽  
Structural Interpretation ◽  
Structural Controls ◽  
Core Recovery ◽  
Direct Observations ◽  
Drill Holes

Abstract The structural controls on unconformity-related uranium deposits of the Athabasca basin, Saskatchewan, Canada, are a matter of debate regarding the role of inherited fault systems and their reactivation. This can be related to the lack of outcrops allowing for direct observations, the strong clay alteration halos wrapping deposits that often obliterate structures, and the poor core recovery related to drilling strongly altered and mineralized intervals, which limits observation of structures and reliable oriented measurements. Borehole imaging technology is an invaluable alternative for obtaining oriented data through challenging drilling intervals. The use of borehole Acoustic Televiewer (ATV) has been integrated in recent exploratory campaigns in the Athabasca basin by Orano Canada. Here, we present the inputs and benefits of the use of the ATV in the exploration of unconformity-related uranium deposits and the structural analysis of oriented data from seven inclined diamond drill holes completed in 2016 during the McClean project (Sue deposits). The main objectives were to precisely identify the structural controls of the basement-hosted mineralization, and to test the tool in a well-known site. This work shows the applicability and added value of using televiewer probes to provide reliable oriented data in zones where there is much less information available. The ATV data structural interpretation supports the concept of mineralization of dilational jogs opening during preexisting shear-related foliation under right-lateral reverse fault reactivation. The ATV provides robust oriented data, allowing for a better understanding of the meaning of flat-lying mineralized structures along the Sue trend.

scholarly journals Structural Controls of Uranium Mineralization in the Basement of the Athabasca Basin, Saskatchewan, Canada

Geofluids ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-30
Author(s):  
Antonio Benedicto ◽  
Maher Abdelrazek ◽  
Patrick Ledru ◽  
Cameron MacKay ◽  
Dwayne Kinar
Keyword(s):  
Regional Scale ◽  
Structural Data ◽  
Shear Zones ◽  
Uranium Mineralization ◽  
Uranium Deposits ◽  
Athabasca Basin ◽  
Structural Controls ◽  
The Right ◽  
Drill Holes

The occurrence of unconformity-related uranium mineralization requires the combination of three components: fluids with the right composition, geochemical traps with the right agents that produce precipitation, and structural traps with the right geometry. In the Athabasca Basin unconformity-related uranium deposits, while basinal brines are commonly accepted as the principal mineralized fluids and graphite and gases (CH4, CO2, and H2S) are well known as the reductants, only few case studies describing structural traps are published. A number of recent works, including numerical modelling, have improved the understanding of the role of inherited shear zones on fluid flow and the development of uranium deposits at a micro- and regional-scale. Nevertheless, there is still a lack of knowledge about the meso- or deposit-scale structural controls that lead to the present (and potentially predictive) localization of uranium deposits along a given shear zone. The present work examines new structural data from drill holes and deals with (i) the identification of mesoscale structural traps that lead to the formation of the Athabasca unconformity-related uranium deposits hosted within the basement and (ii) with the understanding of the role and mode of reactivation of the inherited shear zones. The Sue deposits (McClean Project), the Tri-Island showing (Martin Lake Project) in the Eastern Athabasca, and the Spitfire prospect (Hook Lake Project) in the Western Athabasca have been selected for a detailed analysis of structures and related uranium mineralization. The structural analysis performed brings new insights about the mesoscale structural controls, the role the inherited ductile fabric had on the mode of brittle reactivation and to trap mineralization, and the tectonic regime to which basement-hosted uranium deposits may be associated in the Athabasca Basin.

Structural Controls on Fluid Flow During Compressional Reactivation of Basement Faults: Insights from Numerical Modeling for the Formation of Unconformity-Related Uranium Deposits in the Athabasca Basin, Canada

2017 ◽  
Vol 112 (2) ◽  
pp. 451-466 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zenghua Li ◽  
Guoxiang Chi ◽  
Kathryn M. Bethune ◽  
David Thomas ◽  
Gerard Zaluski
Keyword(s):  
Numerical Modeling ◽  
Fluid Flow ◽  
Uranium Deposits ◽  
Athabasca Basin ◽  
Structural Controls ◽  
Basement Faults

Hydrothermal Rare Earth Element (Xenotime) Mineralization at Maw Zone, Athabasca Basin, Canada, and Its Relationship to Unconformity-Related Uranium Deposits—A Reply

2018 ◽  
Vol 113 (4) ◽  
pp. 998-999 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guoxiang Chi ◽  
Nigel J.F. Blamey ◽  
Morteza Rabiei ◽  
Charles Normand
Keyword(s):  
Rare Earth ◽  
Rare Earth Element ◽  
Earth Element ◽  
Uranium Deposits ◽  
Athabasca Basin

Chemical brecciation processes in the Sue unconformity-type uranium deposits, Eastern Athabasca Basin (Canada)

2003 ◽  
Vol 80 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 241-258 ◽  
Author(s):  
G Lorilleux ◽  
M Cuney ◽  
M Jébrak ◽  
J.C Rippert ◽  
P Portella
Keyword(s):  
Uranium Deposits ◽  
Athabasca Basin

scholarly journals Paragenetic and petrographic study of uranium mineralization along the Midwest Trend, Northeastern Athabasca Basin

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Peter Ferguson ◽  
Guoxiang Chi ◽  
Charles Normand ◽  
Patrick Ledru ◽  
Odile Maufrais-Smith
Keyword(s):  
Mineral Resource ◽  
Genetic Model ◽  
Uranium Deposit ◽  
Current Model ◽  
Uranium Mineralization ◽  
Mining District ◽  
Uranium Deposits ◽  
Athabasca Basin ◽  
Technical Report ◽  
Petrographic Study

The Athabasca Basin in northern Saskatchewan is host to many world-class uranium deposits associated with the unconformity between the Paleoproterozoic sandstone of the basin and the underlying crystalline basement (Jefferson et al., 2007).  While the style and tonnage of these deposits vary, the current genetic model for unconformity-related uranium deposits has been a practical tool for exploration in the Athabasca Basin. However, the factors which control the location and formation of these deposits is still not fully understood. A paragenetic and petrographic study of mineralization along the Midwest Trend, located on the northeastern margin of the Athabasca Basin, aims to refine the current model and to address the general problem: What are the factors which control mineralization and non-mineralization? The Midwest Trend will be used as a "modèle réduit" for uranium mineralization, as it displays many features characteristic of unconformity type deposits. The Midwest Trend comprises three mineral leases that encompass two uranium deposits, the Midwest Main and Midwest A (Allen et al., 2017a, b). Mineralization occurs along a NE-trending graphitic structure, and is hosted by the sandstone, at the unconformity, and in much lesser amounts in the underlying basement rocks. Petrographic observations aided by the use of RAMAN spectroscopy and SEM-EDS, have been used to create a paragenetic sequence of mineralization (Fig.1). Future work will focus on fluid inclusion studies using microthermometry, LA-ICP-MS, and mass spectrometry of contained gases. References:Allen, T., Quirt, D., Masset, O. (2017a). Midwest A Uranium Deposit, Midwest Property, Northern Mining District, Saskatchewan, NTS Map Area 741/8: 2017 Mineral Resource Technical Report. AREVA Resources Canada Inc. Internal Report No. 17-CND-33-01. Allen, T., Quirt, D., Masset, O. (2017b). Midwest Main Uranium Deposit, Midwest Property, Northern Mining District, Saskatchewan, NTS Map Area 741/8: 2017 Mineral Resource Technical Report. AREVA Resources Canada Inc. Internal Report No. 17-CND-33-01. Jefferson, C.W., Thomas, D.J., Gandhi, S.S., Ramaekers, P., Delaney, G., Brisbin, D., Cutts, C., Portella, P., and Olson, R.A., 2007: Unconformity-associated uranium deposits of the Athabasca Basin, Saskatchewan and Alberta. Geological Survey of Canada, Bulletin 588, p. 23–67.

Geological environment of the Cigar Lake uranium deposit

1993 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 653-673 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Bruneton
Keyword(s):  
Uranium Deposit ◽  
Transitional Zone ◽  
Uranium Deposits ◽  
Athabasca Basin ◽  
Structural Framework ◽  
Basement Rocks ◽  
Metamorphic Basement ◽  
Basement Ridge ◽  
Archean Basement ◽  
East West

The Cigar Lake uranium deposit occurs within the Athabasca Basin of northern Saskatchewan, Canada. Like other major uranium deposits of the basin, it is located at the unconformity separating Helikian sandstones of the Athabasca Group from Aphebian metasediments and plutonic rocks of the Wollaston Group. The Athabasca Group was deposited in an intra-continental sedimentary basin that was filled by fluviatile terrestrial quartz sandstones and conglomerates. The group appears undeformed and its actual maximum thickness is about 1500 m. On the eastern side of the basin, the detrital units correspond to the Manitou Falls Formations where most of the uranium deposits are located. The Lower Pelitic unit of the Wollaston Group, which lies directly on the Archean basement, is considered to be the most favourable horizon for uranium mineralization. During the Hudsonian orogeny (1800–1900 Ma), the group underwent polyphase deformation and upper amphibolite facies metamorphism. The Hudsonian orogeny was followed by a long period of erosion and weathering and the development of a paleoweathering profile.On the Waterbury Lake property, the Manitou Falls Formation is 250–500 m thick and corresponds to units MFd, MFc, and MFb. The conglomeratic MFb unit hosts the Cigar Lake deposit. However, the basal conglomerate is absent at the deposit, wedging out against an east–west, 20 m high, pre-Athabasca basement ridge, on top of which is located the orebody.Two major lithostructural domains are present in the metamorphic basement of the property: (1) a southern area composed mainly of pelitic metasediments (Wollaston Domain) and (2) a northern area with large lensoid granitic domes (Mudjatik Domain). The Cigar Lake east–west pelitic basin, which contains the deposit, is located in the transitional zone between the two domains. The metamorphic basement rocks in the basin consist mainly of graphitic metapelitic gneisses and calcsilicate gneisses, which are inferred to be part of the Lower Pelitic unit. Graphite- and pyrite-rich "augen gneisses," an unusual facies within the graphitic metapelitic gneisses, occur primarily below the Cigar Lake orebody.The mineralogy and geochemistry of the graphitic metapelitic gneisses suggest that they were originally shales. The abundance of magnesium in the intercalated carbonates layers indicates an evaporitic origin.The structural framework is dominated by large northeast–southwest lineaments and wide east–west mylonitic corridors. These mylonites, which contain the augen gneisses, are considered to be the most favourable features for the concentration of uranium mineralization.Despite the presence of the orebody, large areas of the Waterbury Lake property remain totally unexplored and open for new discoveries.

scholarly journals Blowing snow detection from ground-based ceilometers: application to East Antarctica

2017 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 2755-2772 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexandra Gossart ◽  
Niels Souverijns ◽  
Irina V. Gorodetskaya ◽  
Stef Lhermitte ◽  
Jan T. M. Lenaerts ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Wind Speed ◽  
Numerical Models ◽  
East Antarctica ◽  
Added Value ◽  
Polar Regions ◽  
Blowing Snow ◽  
Surface Mass ◽  
Direct Observations ◽  
Synoptic Conditions ◽  
Fresh Snow

Abstract. Blowing snow impacts Antarctic ice sheet surface mass balance by snow redistribution and sublimation. However, numerical models poorly represent blowing snow processes, while direct observations are limited in space and time. Satellite retrieval of blowing snow is hindered by clouds and only the strongest events are considered. Here, we develop a blowing snow detection (BSD) algorithm for ground-based remote-sensing ceilometers in polar regions and apply it to ceilometers at Neumayer III and Princess Elisabeth (PE) stations, East Antarctica. The algorithm is able to detect (heavy) blowing snow layers reaching 30 m height. Results show that 78 % of the detected events are in agreement with visual observations at Neumayer III station. The BSD algorithm detects heavy blowing snow 36 % of the time at Neumayer (2011–2015) and 13 % at PE station (2010–2016). Blowing snow occurrence peaks during the austral winter and shows around 5 % interannual variability. The BSD algorithm is capable of detecting blowing snow both lifted from the ground and occurring during precipitation, which is an added value since results indicate that 92 % of the blowing snow is during synoptic events, often combined with precipitation. Analysis of atmospheric meteorological variables shows that blowing snow occurrence strongly depends on fresh snow availability in addition to wind speed. This finding challenges the commonly used parametrizations, where the threshold for snow particles to be lifted is a function of wind speed only. Blowing snow occurs predominantly during storms and overcast conditions, shortly after precipitation events, and can reach up to 1300 m a. g. l.  in the case of heavy mixed events (precipitation and blowing snow together). These results suggest that synoptic conditions play an important role in generating blowing snow events and that fresh snow availability should be considered in determining the blowing snow onset.

Hydrothermal Rare Earth Element (Xenotime) Mineralization at Maw Zone, Athabasca Basin, Canada, and Its Relationship to Unconformity-Related Uranium Deposits

2017 ◽  
Vol 112 (6) ◽  
pp. 1483-1507 ◽  
Author(s):  
Morteza Rabiei ◽  
Guoxiang Chi ◽  
Charles Normand ◽  
William J. Davis ◽  
Mostafa Fayek ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rare Earth ◽  
Rare Earth Element ◽  
Earth Element ◽  
Uranium Deposits ◽  
Athabasca Basin

Interplay between thermal convection and compressional fault reactivation in the formation of unconformity-related uranium deposits

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zenghua Li ◽  
Guoxiang Chi ◽  
Kathryn M. Bethune ◽  
Khalifa Eldursi ◽  
David Quirt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Thermal Convection ◽  
Fault Reactivation ◽  
Uranium Deposits

Geochemistry of the Athabasca Basin, Saskatchewan, Canada, and the Unconformity-related Uranium Deposits Hosted By It

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Alexandre
Keyword(s):  
Chemical Composition ◽  
Large Data ◽  
Aluminum Phosphate ◽  
Enrichment Factors ◽  
Uranium Deposits ◽  
Average Chemical Composition ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Athabasca Basin ◽  
Ore Bodies ◽  
Five Elements

Abstract A large data set comprising near-total digestion analyses of whole rock samples from the Athabasca Basin, Saskatchewan, Canada (based principally on the Geological Survey of Canada open file 7495), containing more than 20,000 analyses, was used to define the average chemical composition of Athabasca Group sandstones and of unconformity-related uranium deposits hosted by the basin. The chemical composition of unaltered and un-mineralized Athabasca Group sandstones is dominated by Al (median Al2O3 of 1.14 wt.%), Fe (median Fe2O3 of 0.24 wt.%), and K (median K2O of 0.11 wt.%; Si was not measured), corresponding mostly to the presence of kaolin, illite, and hematite, in addition to the most-abundant quartz. The median concentration of U in the barren sandstones is 1 ppm, with 5 ppm Th, 3 ppm Pb, and 56 ppm ΣREE. Other trace elements present in significant amounts are Zr (median of 100 ppm), Sr (median of 69 ppm), and B (median of 43 ppm), corresponding to the presence of zircon, illite, and dravite. The elements most enriched in a typical Athabasca Basin unconformity-related uranium deposit relative to the barren sandstone are U (median enrichment of ×710), Bi (×175), V (×77), and Mg (×45), followed by five elements with enrichment factors between 20 and 30 (Co, Mo, K, As, and Ni). These correspond to the presence in the ore bodies of alteration minerals (dravite, kaolinite, illite, chlorite, aluminum-phosphate-sulfate minerals, and a suite of sulfide minerals) and are similar to what has been observed before. These elements are similar to the typical pathfinder elements described above known deposits, but their usefulness has to be assessed based on their relative mobility in the predominantly oxidizing Athabasca Basin sandstones.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document