scholarly journals Two-Step Modified Newton Method for Nonlinear Lavrentiev Regularization

2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Santhosh George ◽  
Suresan Pareth
Keyword(s):  
Newton Method ◽  
Regularization Parameter ◽  
Adaptive Method ◽  
Initial Guess ◽  
Optimal Order ◽  
Lavrentiev Regularization ◽  
Modified Newton Method ◽  
Actual Solution ◽  
Ill Posed ◽  
General Source

A two step modified Newton method is considered for obtaining an approximate solution for the nonlinear ill-posed equation F(x)=f when the available data are fδ with ‖f−fδ‖≤δ and the operator F is monotone. The derived error estimate under a general source condition on x0−x^ is of optimal order; here x0 is the initial guess and x^ is the actual solution. The regularization parameter is chosen according to the adaptive method considered by Perverzev and Schock (2005). The computational results provided endorse the reliability and effectiveness of our method.

scholarly journals Newton Type Iteration for Tikhonov Regularization of Nonlinear Ill-Posed Problems in Hilbert Scales

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Monnanda Erappa Shobha ◽  
Santhosh George
Keyword(s):  
Integral Equation ◽  
Iterative Method ◽  
Iterative Scheme ◽  
Initial Guess ◽  
Optimal Order ◽  
Source Condition ◽  
Adaptive Scheme ◽  
Actual Solution ◽  
Ill Posed ◽  
General Source

Recently, Vasin and George (2013) considered an iterative scheme for approximately solving an ill-posed operator equationF(x)=y. In order to improve the error estimate available by Vasin and George (2013), in the present paper we extend the iterative method considered by Vasin and George (2013), in the setting of Hilbert scales. The error estimates obtained under a general source condition onx0-x^(x0is the initial guess andx^is the actual solution), using the adaptive scheme proposed by Pereverzev and Schock (2005), are of optimal order. The algorithm is applied to numerical solution of an integral equation in Numerical Example section.

scholarly journals Newton-Type Iteration for Tikhonov Regularization of Nonlinear Ill-Posed Problems

2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Santhosh George
Keyword(s):  
Newton Method ◽  
Hilbert Spaces ◽  
Nonlinear Integral Equation ◽  
Nonlinear Operator ◽  
Regularization Parameter ◽  
Adaptive Method ◽  
Majorizing Sequence ◽  
Source Condition ◽  
Ill Posed ◽  
General Source

Recently in the work of George, 2010, we considered a modified Gauss-Newton method for approximate solution of a nonlinear ill-posed operator equationF(x)=y, whereF:D(F)⊆X→Yis a nonlinear operator between the Hilbert spacesXandY. The analysis in George, 2010 was carried out using a majorizing sequence. In this paper, we consider also the modified Gauss-Newton method, but the convergence analysis and the error estimate are obtained by analyzing the odd and even terms of the sequence separately. We use the adaptive method in the work of Pereverzev and Schock, 2005 for choosing the regularization parameter. The optimality of this method is proved under a general source condition. A numerical example of nonlinear integral equation shows the performance of this procedure.

Simplified Iteratively Regularized Gauss–Newton Method in Banach Spaces Under a General Source Condition

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 321-341
Author(s):  
Pallavi Mahale ◽  
Sharad Kumar Dixit
Keyword(s):  
Newton Method ◽  
Regularization Parameter ◽  
A Priori ◽  
Identification Problem ◽  
Stopping Rule ◽  
Optimal Error Estimates ◽  
Source Condition ◽  
Parameter Identification Problem ◽  
Ill Posed ◽  
General Source

AbstractIn this paper, we consider a simplified iteratively regularized Gauss–Newton method in a Banach space setting under a general source condition. We will obtain order-optimal error estimates both for an a priori stopping rule and for a Morozov-type stopping rule together with a posteriori choice of the regularization parameter. An advantage of a general source condition is that it provides a unified setting for the error analysis which can be applied to the cases of both severely and mildly ill-posed problems. We will give a numerical example of a parameter identification problem to discuss the performance of the method.

scholarly journals Inverse Free Iterative Methods for Nonlinear Ill-Posed Operator Equations

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ioannis K. Argyros ◽  
Santhosh George ◽  
P. Jidesh
Keyword(s):  
Approximate Solution ◽  
Regularization Parameter ◽  
Optimal Order ◽  
Operator Equations ◽  
Source Condition ◽  
Numerical Examples ◽  
Ill Posed ◽  
Balancing Principle ◽  
General Source ◽  
New Iterative Method

We present a new iterative method which does not involve inversion of the operators for obtaining an approximate solution for the nonlinear ill-posed operator equationF(x)=y. The proposed method is a modified form of Tikhonov gradient (TIGRA) method considered by Ramlau (2003). The regularization parameter is chosen according to the balancing principle considered by Pereverzev and Schock (2005). The error estimate is derived under a general source condition and is of optimal order. Some numerical examples involving integral equations are also given in this paper.

scholarly journals COMPLEXITY ESTIMATES FOR SEVERELY ILL-POSED PROBLEMS UNDER A POSTERIORI SELECTION OF REGULARIZATION PARAMETER

2017 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 283-299
Author(s):  
Sergii G. Solodky ◽  
Ganna L. Myleiko ◽  
Evgeniya V. Semenova
Keyword(s):  
Integral Equations ◽  
Regularization Parameter ◽  
Efficient Algorithms ◽  
Optimal Order ◽  
A Posteriori ◽  
Order Of Accuracy ◽  
Tikhonov Method ◽  
Discrete Information ◽  
Ill Posed ◽  
Selection Of

In the article the authors developed two efficient algorithms for solving severely ill-posed problems such as Fredholm’s integral equations. The standard Tikhonov method is applied as a regularization. To select a regularization parameter we employ two different a posteriori rules, namely, discrepancy and balancing principles. It is established that proposed strategies not only achieved optimal order of accuracy on the class of problems under consideration, but also they are economical in the sense of used discrete information.

scholarly journals ITERATED LAVRENTIEV REGULARIZATION FOR NONLINEAR ILL-POSED PROBLEMS

2009 ◽  
Vol 51 (2) ◽  
pp. 191-217 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. MAHALE ◽  
M. T. NAIR
Keyword(s):  
Nonlinear Operator ◽  
Optimal Error Estimate ◽  
Positive Real ◽  
Iterative Regularization ◽  
Optimal Error ◽  
Lavrentiev Regularization ◽  
Inexact Data ◽  
Ill Posed ◽  
Funct Anal ◽  
General Source

AbstractWe consider an iterated form of Lavrentiev regularization, using a null sequence (αk) of positive real numbers to obtain a stable approximate solution for ill-posed nonlinear equations of the form F(x)=y, where F:D(F)⊆X→X is a nonlinear operator and X is a Hilbert space. Recently, Bakushinsky and Smirnova [“Iterative regularization and generalized discrepancy principle for monotone operator equations”, Numer. Funct. Anal. Optim.28 (2007) 13–25] considered an a posteriori strategy to find a stopping index kδ corresponding to inexact data yδ with $\|y-y^\d \|\leq \d $ resulting in the convergence of the method as δ→0. However, they provided no error estimates. We consider an alternate strategy to find a stopping index which not only leads to the convergence of the method, but also provides an order optimal error estimate under a general source condition. Moreover, the condition that we impose on (αk) is weaker than that considered by Bakushinsky and Smirnova.

scholarly journals ON NUMERICAL REALIZATION OF QUASIOPTIMAL PARAMETER CHOICES IN (ITERATED) TIKHONOV AND LAVRENTIEV REGULARIZATION

2009 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 99-108 ◽  
Author(s):  
Toomas Raus ◽  
Uno Hämarik
Keyword(s):  
Hilbert Spaces ◽  
Noise Level ◽  
Regularization Parameter ◽  
Numerical Realization ◽  
A Posteriori ◽  
Parameter Choice ◽  
Linear Combinations ◽  
Choice Alternative ◽  
Lavrentiev Regularization ◽  
Ill Posed

We consider linear ill‐posed problems in Hilbert spaces with noisy right hand side and given noise level. For approximation of the solution the Tikhonov method or the iterated variant of this method may be used. In self‐adjoint problems the Lavrentiev method or its iterated variant are used. For a posteriori choice of the regularization parameter often quasioptimal rules are used which require computing of additionally iterated approximations. In this paper we propose for parameter choice alternative numerical schemes, using instead of additional iterations linear combinations of approximations with different parameters.

scholarly journals An optimal order yielding discrepancy principle for simplified regularization of ill-posed problems in Hilbert scales

2003 ◽  
Vol 2003 (39) ◽  
pp. 2487-2499 ◽  
Author(s):  
Santhosh George ◽  
M. Thamban Nair
Keyword(s):  
Approximate Solution ◽  
Hilbert Spaces ◽  
Regularization Parameter ◽  
Optimal Order ◽  
Discrepancy Principle ◽  
Parameter Choice ◽  
Bounded Linear ◽  
Choice Strategy ◽  
Ill Posed ◽  
Parameter Choice Strategy

Recently, Tautenhahn and Hämarik (1999) have considered a monotone rule as a parameter choice strategy for choosing the regularization parameter while considering approximate solution of an ill-posed operator equationTx=y, whereTis a bounded linear operator between Hilbert spaces. Motivated by this, we propose a new discrepancy principle for the simplified regularization, in the setting of Hilbert scales, whenTis a positive and selfadjoint operator. When the datayis known only approximately, our method provides optimal order under certain natural assumptions on the ill-posedness of the equation and smoothness of the solution. The result, in fact, improves an earlier work of the authors (1997).

Lavrentiev Regularization and Balancing Principle for Solving Ill-Posed Problems with Monotone Operators

2010 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 444-454 ◽  
Author(s):  
E.V. Semenova
Keyword(s):  
Regularization Parameter ◽  
Monotone Operators ◽  
Smooth Solutions ◽  
Lavrentiev Regularization ◽  
Ill Posed ◽  
Balancing Principle ◽  
Selection Of

AbstractThe paper considers a method for solving nonlinear ill-posed problems with monotone operators. The approach combines the Lavrentiev method, the fixedpoint method, and the balancing principle for selection of the regularization parameter. The method’s optimality has been proved for some set of smooth solutions. A test example proves the efficiency of the proposed method.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document