Updated 2014 STOPP criteria to identify potentially inappropriate prescribing in community-dwelling elderly patients

2017 ◽  
Vol 55 (10) ◽  
pp. 769-773 ◽  
Author(s):  
María Luisa Nicieza-Garcia ◽  
Gloria Manso ◽  
Esther Salgueiro
2014 ◽  
Vol 48 (12) ◽  
pp. 1546-1554 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caitriona Cahir ◽  
Frank Moriarty ◽  
Conor Teljeur ◽  
Tom Fahey ◽  
Kathleen Bennett

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
pp. 72
Author(s):  
Ann Doherty ◽  
Frank Moriarty ◽  
Fiona Boland ◽  
Barbara Clyne ◽  
Tom Fahey ◽  
...  

Introduction: Internationally, health systems face the challenge of managing a growing ageing population living with multimorbidity and polypharmacy. Potentially inappropriate prescribing is common among patients with polypharmacy, increasing the risk for adverse drug reactions (ADRs). Several prescribing indicator sets exist to improve prescribing and reduce potentially inappropriate prescribing, but do not address prescribing cascades. Prescribing cascades occur when a medication is prescribed to treat an ADR to another prescribed medication, whether intentionally or unintentionally, and constitute an important area to consider when characterising problematic polypharmacy. This is a protocol for a systematic review examining prescribing cascades in community-dwelling adults. Methods: The review will be reported adhering to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A systematic search of Medline (Ovid), EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL and the Cochrane Library will be conducted from inception to March 2021, using a predetermined strategy. Grey literature will be searched using Open Grey, MedNar, Dart Europe, and the Turning Research Into Practice (TRIP) databases. No restrictions will be placed on language or publication year. Inclusion criteria are: population - community-dwelling adults (≥18 years); risk - prescription medication with the potential to cause side effects; outcomes - initiation of a new medicine to ‘treat’ or reduce the risk of experiencing an ADR. Prospective and retrospective cohort studies, case control and case series studies will be included. Two reviewers will independently screen titles and abstracts; studies meeting inclusion criteria will undergo independent full-text screening by two reviewers.  A narrative synthesis will be conducted. Study quality will be independently assessed using the relevant Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist. Discussion: This systematic review will identify examples of prescribing cascades for community-dwelling adults and contribute to developing an evidence base regarding such cascades. Registration: PROSPERO [CRD42021243163, 31/03/2021].


2018 ◽  
Vol 89 (6) ◽  
pp. 453-460 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gorana Nedin Ranković ◽  
Slobodan Janković ◽  
Radmila Veličković Radovanović ◽  
Zorica Jović ◽  
Gordana Pešić ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document