scholarly journals Use of nitrification inhibitor DMPP to improve nitrogen recovery in irrigated wheat on a calcareous soil

2010 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 1218 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. M. Villar ◽  
E. Guillaumes
2017 ◽  
Vol 63 (5) ◽  
pp. 488-498 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rubab Sarfraz ◽  
Awais Shakoor ◽  
Muhammad Abdullah ◽  
Ammara Arooj ◽  
Azhar Hussain ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Georgios Giannopoulos ◽  
Lars Elsgaard ◽  
Georgios Zanakis ◽  
Rima B. Franklin ◽  
Bonnie L. Brown ◽  
...  

<p>Nitrogen (N) fertilization is an essential agronomic practice, which increases crop yields and improves soil fertility. Globally, more than 110 x 10<sup>9</sup> kg of chemical N fertilizers are applied each year with urea-N being one of the most affordable options. Upon urea hydrolysis, any portion not assimilated by crops is either volatilized as NH<sub>3</sub> or microbially nitrified (i.e., NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> oxidized) to leachable NO<sub>3</sub><sup>-</sup> and NO<sub>2</sub><sup>-</sup>. Nitrification inhibitors (NI) are increasingly co-applied as a sustainable agricultural practice and block the process of nitrification, resulting in a temporal increase of NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> in the soils. Several studies have documented the effectiveness of NIs in retaining soil NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> and increasing crop yields, but less is known about the effects of NIs on the fate of urea–N and the overall impact of NIs on the soil microbial community.</p><p>In a 60 day soil mesocosm experiment, we investigated the effects of Nitrapyrin (NI; 2-chloro-6-(trichloromethyl)pyridine) co-applied with a selection of urea-based fertilizers: urea (U); U with urease inhibitors (U+UI); methylene-urea (MU); and zeolite-coated urea (ZU), on a typical Mediterranean soil under ambient summer conditions. We showed that NI applied with urea fertilizers resulted in a slower decay of extractable NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> with a concurrent increase in NH<sub>3</sub> volatilization. Integrated measures of soil NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> were 1.5 to 3.3-fold greater when NI was applied. At the same time, there was a 10 to 60% reduction in integrated measures of NO<sub>3</sub><sup>-</sup> and NO<sub>2</sub><sup>-</sup> when NI was applied with the tested fertilizer types, except MU fertilizer where the integrated measures of NO<sub>3</sub><sup>-</sup> and NO<sub>2</sub><sup>-</sup> doubled. Upon urea hydrolysis, the released NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> was transformed to NO<sub>3</sub><sup>-</sup> and NO<sub>2</sub><sup>-</sup>, which subsequently decreased in concentration following a typical nitrification - denitrification pathway in the absence of plants. Soil N<sub>2</sub>O emissions from urea fertilizers were reduced by 40% with UI, 50% with NI, and 66% with NI + UI.</p><p>Interestingly, 15 days after the application of NI, there was a decrease in bacterial abundance (eub genes; qPCR) in all fertilized treatments. NI dramatically reduced the abundance of ammonia-oxidizing microbes (amoA genes) and there were fewer bacteria associated with denitrification genes (nirK, nirS, nosZ) when NI was applied. </p><p>At the end of the experiment, there was no significant difference in total N among all fertilized soils. Total N was in excess when compared to the control, and it was a considerable N pool potentially immobilized in microbial biomass in the absence of crops.</p><p>In conclusion, the use of NI doubled NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> retention in the soil and decreased soil N<sub>2</sub>O emission by 50%, through negatively affecting ammonia oxidizing and denitrifying microbes and subsequently reducing soil available NO<sub>3</sub><sup>-</sup> and NO<sub>2</sub><sup>-</sup>. The application of NIs should be carefully planned and synchronized (timing) with crop growth to reduce subsequent N transformations and N loss to the environment.</p><p><strong>Keywords</strong><strong>:</strong> urea, zeolite, methylene-urea, nitrification inhibitor, nitrapyrin, calcareous soil, soil nitrogen</p>


2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. e0302
Author(s):  
Noemí Mateo-Marín ◽  
Ramón Isla ◽  
Dolores Quílez

Aim of the study: The use of pig slurry as fertiliser is associated with gaseous nitrogen (N) losses, especially ammonia (NH3) and nitrous oxide (N2O), leading to environmental problems and a reduction of its fertiliser value. This study evaluates, in an irrigated wheat crop, the effect of different additives mixed with pig slurry to decrease NH3 and N2O losses.Area of study: Middle Ebro valley, SpainMaterials and methods: The treatments were: i) non-N-fertilised control, ii) pig slurry (PS), iii) pig slurry with the urease inhibitor monocarbamide dihydrogen sulphate (PS-UI), iv) pig slurry with a microbial activator in development (PS-A), and v) pig slurry with the nitrification inhibitor 3,4-dimethylpyrazole phosphate (PS-NI). Pig slurry was applied at a target rate of 120 kg NH4+-N ha-1. Ammonia volatilisation was measured using semi-opened static chambers after treatments application at presowing 2016 and side-dressing 2017. Nitrous oxide emissions were measured using static closed chambers after treatments application at the 2017 and 2018 side-dressing.Main results: Ammonia volatilisation was estimated to be 7-9% and 19-23% of NH4+-N applied after presowing and side-dressing applications, respectively. Additives were not able to reduce NH3 emissions in any application moment. PS-NI was the only treatment being effective in reducing N2O emissions, 70% respect to those in PS treatment. Crop yield parameters were not affected by the application of the additives because of the no effect of additives controlling NH3 losses and the low contribution of N2O losses to the N balance (<1 kg N2O-N ha-1).Research highlights: The use of 3,4-dimethylpyrazole phosphate would be recommended from an environmental perspective, although without grain yield benefits.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ezio Nalin de Paulo ◽  
Fernando Shintate Galindo ◽  
Flávio Henrique Silveira Rabêlo ◽  
Joaquim José Frazão ◽  
José Lavres

Human zinc (Zn) deficiency is a worldwide problem, especially in developing countries due to the prevalence of cereals in the diet. Among different alleviation strategies, genetic Zn biofortification is considered a sustainable approach. However, it may depend on Zn availability from soils. We grew Zincol-16 (genetically-Zn-biofortified wheat) and Faisalabad-08 (widely grown standard wheat) in pots with (8 mg kg−1) or without Zn application. The cultivars were grown in a low-Zn calcareous soil. The grain yield of both cultivars was significantly (P≤0.05) increased with that without Zn application. As compared to Faisalabad-08, Zincol-16 had 23 and 41% more grain Zn concentration respectively at control and applied rate of Zn. Faisalabad-08 accumulated about 18% more grain Zn concentration with Zn than Zincol-16 without Zn application. A near target level of grain Zn concentration (36 mg kg−1) was achieved in Zincol-16 only with Zn fertilisation. Over all, the findings clearly signify the importance of agronomic Zn biofortification of genetically Zn-biofortified wheat grown on a low-Zn calcareous soil.


2012 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 303-309
Author(s):  
Ya-Juan LI ◽  
Cui-Hong YANG ◽  
Bo CHEN ◽  
Hui-Zhen QIU

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document