scholarly journals Analysis of Fraudulent Financial Reporting With the Role of KAP Big Four as a Moderation Variable: Crowe's Fraud's Pentagon Theory

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. 180
Author(s):  
Maylia Pramono Sari ◽  
Nindya Pramasheilla ◽  
Fachrurrozie ◽  
Trisni Suryarini ◽  
Imang Dapit Pamungkas
Keyword(s):  
Financial Reporting ◽  
Financial Stability ◽  
Audit Committee ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Fraudulent Financial Reporting ◽  
Ceo Duality ◽  
Fraud Risk ◽  
Big Four

The purpose of this study is to provide empirical evidence of pentagon fraud risk factors sush as financial targets, financial stability, number of audit committee members, nature of industry, change in auditors, auditor opinion, change in director, proportion of the independent commissary, frequent number of CEO pictures, and CEO duality on fraudulent financial reporting with KAP big four as a moderating variable. The samples in this study were all state-owned companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2014-2018. The purposive sampling technique was used in sampling so that 55 companies were obtained. This study uses logistic regression analysis techniques with SPSS version 26. The results of the study indicate that financial stability and the auditor's opinion influence the fraudulent financial reporting. However, financial targets, number of audit committee members, nature of industry, change in auditors, change in director, proportion of the independent commissary, frequent number of CEO pictures, and CEO duality not effect on fraudulent financial reporting.

Audit Committee Oversight of Fraud Risk: The Role of Social Ties, Professional Ties, and Governance Characteristics

2017 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 21-38 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert M. Wilbanks ◽  
Dana R. Hermanson ◽  
Vineeta D. Sharma
Keyword(s):  
Financial Reporting ◽  
Audit Committee ◽  
Social Ties ◽  
Internal Audit ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Professional Experience ◽  
Fraudulent Financial Reporting ◽  
Fraud Risk ◽  
Public Company

SYNOPSIS This study examines audit committee (AC) oversight of fraudulent financial reporting (FFR) risk and management integrity, and how such oversight varies with AC social ties, professional ties, and governance characteristics. Specifically, based on a survey of 134 U.S. public company AC members, we find that AC participants with social ties (i.e., personal ties) to the CEO are negatively associated with AC actions to assess FFR risk and management integrity. Further, the AC appears to cut back on more observable FFR and MI actions when the responding AC member has a social tie to the CEO, consistent with socially connected ACs being reluctant to engage in observable monitoring actions that could jeopardize a social tie to the CEO. However, AC participants with professional ties to other independent directors and those with professional experience as corporate controllers are positively related to such actions. We also find that AC size is positively related to FFR risk assessment, while female AC participants and those serving on boards with greater independence are more likely to report engaging in AC activities to assess management integrity. Finally, when asked more broadly about who they rely on and who is responsible for assessing the risk of FFR, AC members mainly point to the external audit partner, CFO, and head of internal audit. We discuss implications and directions for future research.

scholarly journals The Analysis of Fraudulent Financial Reporting Determinant through Fraud Pentagon Approach

2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 154-165
Author(s):  
Siska Apriliana ◽  
Linda Agustina
Keyword(s):  
Financial Reporting ◽  
Financial Stability ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Annual Reports ◽  
Fraud Triangle ◽  
Manufacturing Companies ◽  
Fraudulent Financial Reporting ◽  
Fraud Theory

The purpose of this study was to analyze the prediction of fraudulent financial reporting with the perspective of pentagon fraud. Pentagon fraud theory is the development of the theories of fraud triangle and fraud diamond. The Pentagon fraud theory adds an element of arrogance in addition to the other four existing elements namely pressure, opportunity, rationalization, and competence or capacity. The population in this study were 157 manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) period 2013-2015. The samples of 46 companies were obtained by using purposive sampling technique, so the analysis unit was 138. Data was analyzed by using descriptive statistical analysis and logistic regression analysis. The test result showed that financial stability, the quality of external auditor, and the number of CEOs photos in the annual reports of the companies had a positive effect on the prediction of fraudulent financial reporting, while financial targets, liquidity, institutional ownership, monitoring effectiveness, replacement of external auditors, and changes of corporate directors had no significant effect on the prediction of fraudulent financial reporting. The conclusion of this study indicates that unstable financial condition, the quality of corporate audit and the level of CEO's arrogance can influence the occurrence of fraudulent financial reporting.

scholarly journals ANALISIS FAKTOR-FAKTOR DALAM PERSPEKTIF FRAUD TRIANGLE SEBAGAI PREDIKTOR FRAUDULENT FINANCIAL REPORTING

2018 ◽  
pp. 251
Author(s):  
I Gusti Putu Oka Surya Utama ◽  
I Wayan Ramantha ◽  
I Dewa Nyoman Badera
Keyword(s):  
Organizational Structure ◽  
Financial Reporting ◽  
Financial Stability ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
External Pressure ◽  
Fraud Triangle ◽  
Fraudulent Financial Reporting ◽  
Financial Need ◽  
Positive Effect

The reduction of financial reporting information’s quality is caused by management fraud behavior by manipulate the financial reporting in order to looks good. This research aims to obtain empirical evidence the effect of fraud triangle factors are financial stability, external pressure, personal financial need, financial targets, nature of industry, ineffective monitoring, organizational structure, and auditor switching to fraudulent financial reporting in nonfinancial companies which listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange period 2012-2014. The sample determined by utilizing purposive sampling technique, therefore as many as 156 of observation sample was obtained. The data observed by logistic regression analysis method. The results show that pressure element these are financial stability, external pressure, and personal financial need has a positive effect to fraudulent financial reporting. Opportunity element these are organizational structure has a negative effect to fraudulent financial reporting. Rationalization element, auditors switching has a positive effect to fraudulent financial reporting. Meanwhile financial targets, nature of industry, and ineffective monitoring have no effect.

scholarly journals Hexagon Fraud: Detection of Fraudulent Financial Reporting in State-Owned Enterprises Indonesia

Economies ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 13
Author(s):  
Tarmizi Achmad ◽  
Imam Ghozali ◽  
Imang Dapit Pamungkas
Keyword(s):  
Financial Reporting ◽  
Financial Stability ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Fraudulent Financial Reporting ◽  
Purposeful Sampling ◽  
Public Company ◽  
External Pressures ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Positive Effect

This study aims to detect fraudulent financial reporting using hexagon fraud analysis, including seven factors: financial stability, external pressures, ineffective monitoring, auditor changes, change in director, arrogance, and collusion. The subject of this research is a public company consolidated audit report of state-owned enterprises. The existence of conflicting results, the phenomenon of fraudulent financial reporting, and limited research using the hexagon of fraud theory prompted this research to examine the factors that influence fraudulent financial reporting. The sample was selected using a sampling technique, with the criteria of state-owned enterprises listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2016–2020. The method used is quantitative, and the analytical method used is logistic regression analysis. The sampling technique used was purposeful sampling, so the number of samples was 125. The results of this study indicate that financial stability and external pressures have a positive effect on fraudulent financial reporting. However, ineffective monitoring, auditor changes, change in director, arrogance, and collusion do not affect fraudulent financial reporting.

scholarly journals Pengaruh Elemen-Elemen Fraud Pentagon Terhadap Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 3405-3418
Author(s):  
Alfamet Randa ◽  
Sany Dwita
Keyword(s):  
Logistic Regression ◽  
Regression Analysis ◽  
Data Analysis ◽  
Financial Reporting ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Empirical Studies ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Fraudulent Financial Reporting ◽  
Real Estate Sector ◽  
Final Sample

This study aims to determine the effect of pentagon fraud’s theory in detecting fraudulent financial reporting empirical studies on companies in property and real estate sector in Indonesia listed on the Stock Exchange in 2014-2018. The sampling technique used purposive sampling with the final sample of 18 companies. Data analysis used in this research is logistic regression analysis. The result of this research showed that : Pressure (ROA), Opportunity (BDOUT), Competence (DCHANGE) and Arogance (CEOPIC) have no significant effect on fraudulent financial reporting. While the Rationalization (Change of Auditor) has a significant effect on fraudulent financial reporting.

scholarly journals DETECTION OF FRAUDULENT FINANCIAL STATEMENT THROUGH PENTAGON THEORY WITH AUDIT COMMITTEE AS MODERATING

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 35
Author(s):  
Ely Indriyani ◽  
Dhini Suryandari
Keyword(s):  
Regression Analysis ◽  
Financial Stability ◽  
Audit Committee ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Financial Statements ◽  
Analysis Data ◽  
External Pressure ◽  
Analysis Technique ◽  
Fraudulent Financial Statements

This study aims to examine financial targets, financial stability, external pressure, personal financial needs, effective monitoring, nature of industry, total accruals, change of directors, and CEO duality in detecting fraudulent financial statements with the audit committee as the moderating variable. The population of this research is 20 state-owned companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (BEI) in 2014-2018. Sampling using saturated sampling technique and obtained a final sample of 100 units of analysis. Data collection using documentation techniques. The data analysis technique used regression analysis and Moderated Regression Analysis (MRA). The results of this study indicate that external pressure and the nature of industry have a significant positive effect on the detection of fraudulent financial statements. The audit committee is able to moderate the influence of financial targets, external pressure, nature of industry, and change of directors on the detection of fraudulent financial statements

scholarly journals Analisis Perbandingan Fraud Pentagon dengan Beneish Ratio dalam Pendeteksian Fraudulent Financial Reporting dengan Opini Audit sebagai Variabel Moderating

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Aris Sanulika ◽  
Wahyu Nurul Hidayati
Keyword(s):  
Financial Reporting ◽  
Financial Stability ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Growth Index ◽  
Financial Statements ◽  
Fraudulent Financial Reporting ◽  
Gross Margin ◽  
Publicly Traded Companies ◽  
Asset Quality

ABSTRACTFraudulent Financial Reporting is a deliberate attempt by a company to deceive and mislead users of financial statements, especially investors and creditors, by presenting and manipulating the material value of financial statements. This study aims to determine how the auditor's opinion can moderate the comparative analysis of the pentagon fraud with the beneish ratio in the detection of fraudulent financial reporting. The type of data used in this study is comparative quantitative data. The data source in this study is secondary data. The population in this study are banking companies listed on the IDX. With a sample of 16 publicly traded companies engaged in financial and banking institutions and were listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2014-2017. The results of this study indicate that of 64 samples there were 12.5% which indicated that the financial statements had been manipulated. Auditor opinions can increase the influence of Financial Stability, external auditor quality, change in auditor, change of directors, days sales in receivables index, sales gross margin Index, Asset Quality Index, growth index, depreciation index, sales, and general administration expenses index, leverage index, total accrual to fraudulent financial reporting. Beneish Ratio affects Fraudulent Financial Reporting while Fraud Pentagon does not affect Fraudulent Financial Reporting

scholarly journals Pengaruh Karakteristik Komite Audit, Perusahaan dan Struktur Kepemilikan Terhadap Kecurangan Pelaporan Keuangan

2016 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 50
Author(s):  
Andrian Budi Prasetyo
Keyword(s):  
Financial Reporting ◽  
Ownership Structure ◽  
Audit Committee ◽  
Quantitative Methods ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Annual Reports ◽  
Fraudulent Financial Reporting ◽  
Financial Expertise ◽  
Firm Characteristic

This study examines the effect of audit committee characteristics, firm characteristic and ownership structure on the likelihood of fraudulent financial reporting. Audit committee characteristics is examined by audit committee financial expertise, meetings of the audit committee and the audit committee tenure. Firm characteristic is examined by the leverage, firm size, firm’s growth rate and external auditor. Ownership structure is examined by managerial ownership and institutional ownership. This research is using a quantitative methods research. This research is using secondary data that comes from the cases list of Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (OJK) and annual reports of the listed companies on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX). Using a sample of 15 fraud and 15 non-fraud firms, we did not find a significant relation between the independent variabels and fraudulent financial reporting.

Fraudulent Financial Reporting: An Application of Fraud Pentagon Theory to Association of Southeast Asian Nations Corporate Governance Scorecard

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. 1729 ◽  
Author(s):  
Imang Dapit PAMUNGKAS ◽  
St. Dwiarso UTOMO
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Financial Reporting ◽  
Financial Stability ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
External Pressure ◽  
Managerial Ownership ◽  
Fraudulent Financial Reporting ◽  
Audit Opinion ◽  
Opinion Change ◽  
Insignificant Effect

This study aims to detect and examine fraudulent financial reporting by applying fraud pentagon theory to all companies implementing the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) Corporate Governance Scorecard in Indonesia. This study has the following objectives: to examine and analyze the effect of financial stability, external pressure, financial target, nature of industry, audit opinion, change of directors, managerial ownership against fraudulent financial reporting. In this research, we use correlation research type. The population of this sample is all sectors of companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange. Using sampling technique in the form of Purposive Sampling Technique applying ASEAN Corporate Governance Scorecard in Indonesia with research period of 2012 to 2016, which produce 30 samples, multiple linear regression analysis using SPSS version 22. The results of this study found that financial stability, managerial ownership has a negative and insignificant effect on fraudulent financial reporting. External pressure, nature of industry has a negative and significant effect on fraudulent financial reporting. Financial Target, Audit Opinion, Change of Directors has a positive and insignificant effect on Fraudulent Financial Reporting.

scholarly journals Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Fraudulent Financial Reporting

Akuntabilitas ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 139-152
Author(s):  
Wulanda Maya Sari ◽  
Anik Irawati
Keyword(s):  
Logistic Regression ◽  
Data Analysis ◽  
Financial Reporting ◽  
Financial Stability ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
External Pressure ◽  
Analysis Method ◽  
Fraudulent Financial Reporting ◽  
Spss Software ◽  
Score Model

This study aims to empirically prove the influence of financial stability, external pressure, and ineffective monitoring on fraudulent financial reporting. Financial stability was measured using a comparison of total assets. External pressure was measured using leverage. Meanwhile, ineffective monitoring was measured using the ratio of independent commissioners’ number. The dependent variable in this study was fraudulent financial reporting. It was measured using the F-Score Model. The sample in this study were 21 State Owned Enterprises (BUMN) listed on Indonesia Stock Exchange in period of 2017-2019. The data analysis method used in this study was Logistic Regression using SPSS software version 20. The results of this study indicate that financial stability has no influence on fraudulent financial reporting. Meanwhile, external pressure and ineffective monitoring influence fraudulent financial reporting.How to cite:Sari, W. M., & Irawati, A. (2021). Faktor-faktor yang Mempengaruhi Fraudulent Financial Reporting. Akuntabilitas: Jurnal Ilmu Akuntansi, 14(2), 139-152.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document