scholarly journals PUBLIC SPACE ZONING PATTERNS IN MIXED USE BUILDING POLA ZONING RUANG RUANG PUBLIK PADA BANGUNAN MIXED USE

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 41-53
Author(s):  
Hikmah Purnama Sari ◽  
Gatoet Wardianto
Keyword(s):  
Public Space ◽  
Central Park ◽  
Mixed Use

Inovasi dan kreativitas yang dibutuhkan untuk mengintegrasikan semua jenis, dan fungsi properti ke dalam satu kawasan pengembangan yakni mixed use development. Di Indonesia, konsep ini sejatinya sudah lama diterapkan, sekitar awal tahun 2000-an saat bisnis properti mengalami booming. Pada dasarnya, mixed use development adalah sebuah kawasan terintegrasi yang terdiri dari tempat tinggal, kantor, pusat perbelanjaan, dan fungsi urban lainnya. Beberapa kawasan mixed-use yang terkenal di Indonesia adalah kawasan ciputra world jakarta barat, kawasan central park jakarta selatan, kawasan plaza indonesia di jakarta pusat, kawasan gandaria city jakarta selatan dan distric 8 di jakarta selatan. Seperti kawasankawasan tempat tinggal lainnya, kawasan mixed-use juga mempunyai beberapa karakteristik yang membedakannya dengan kawasan tempat tinggal lainnya. Diminati Karena Integrasi Kawasan Penggabungan tiga atau bahkan lebih dari fungsi urban dalam kawasan mixed-use, membuatnya diminati oleh berbagai kalangan. Mulai dari calon pembeli yang ingin tinggal di sana, sampai pengunjung-pengunjung tidak tetap yang tertarik dengan pusat perbelanjaan, hotel, atau fungsi-fungsi lain dari kawasan mixed-use yang ditawarkan. Kehadiran kawasan mixed-use juga bisa meningkatkan gengsi dan minat orang-orang untuk bisa tinggal di dalam maupun kawasan sekitarnya. Kondisi ini otomatis mengerek harga jual properti di kawasan mixed-use dan di daerah-daerah sekitarnya yang masih dalam jangkauan. Minat yang tinggi ini karena gaya hidup praktis yang ditawarkan. Dengan bisa tinggal di sana, bekerja, melakukan rekreasi, atau bahkan mengenyam pendidikan dalam satu kawasan yang sama, ruang publik juga sebagai aspek penting dalam kawasan yang dapat menunjang berbagai kegitan umum dan bersama.

Parks, People, and Property Values

2016 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 98-111 ◽  
Author(s):  
Catherine McNeur
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Public Space ◽  
Property Values ◽  
Crime Rates ◽  
Real Estate Development ◽  
Central Park ◽  
Psychological Need ◽  
Antebellum Period ◽  
Social Conversation ◽  
Class Divisions

The role that parks played in Manhattan changed dramatically during the antebellum period. Originally dismissed as unnecessary on an island embraced by rivers, parks became a tool for real estate development and gentrification in the 1830s. By the 1850s, politicians, journalists, and landscape architects believed Central Park could be a social salve for a city with rising crime rates, increasingly visible poverty, and deepening class divisions. While many factors (public health, the psychological need for parks, and property values) would remain the same, the changing social conversation showed how ideas of public space were transforming, in rhetoric if not reality.

scholarly journals A Study on Environmental Plan To Support Pedestrians in Public Space of Urban Mixed-use Commercial Facilities

2014 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 181-192
Author(s):  
Mi-Kyoung Ha ◽  
A-Hyun Kim ◽  
Sook-Ha Kim ◽  
Hyo-Chang Lee
Keyword(s):  
Public Space ◽  
Mixed Use

scholarly journals Architecture as a System: Urban Catalysts for Lynchburg, Virginia

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luis Pancorbo ◽  
◽  
Alex Wall ◽  
Iñaki Alday ◽  
◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Public Space ◽  
Architectural Design ◽  
Urban Landscape ◽  
Linear Process ◽  
Urban Systems ◽  
Small Scale ◽  
Urban Context ◽  
Urban Architecture ◽  
Mixed Use ◽  
The University

This paper proposes a critical analysis of “ARCH 2010 Introduction to Urban Architecture” at the School of architecture of the University of Virginia. The studiois part of an overall strategy that tries to subvert the traditional method of teaching in architectural design. In a conventional linear process, students start withthe design of a small-scale architectural object and continue to design buildings in progressively larger scales. Provided with a strong urban context, the 2010 Studio follows a sinusoidal transition of scale, moving from small to large and back again. The ultimate goal of the studio is to put forward/produce an urban architectural project by linking the architectural object with the urban landscape as catalysts for the change within the city. The architectural proposals should be a strategic and thoughtful response to previous research on existing urban systems, and should support the revitalization of public life in their immediate environment and in the whole city. The course was divided in four parts: Elements and infrastructures of the urban environment, developed at Charlottesville Down Town Mall, Urban systems and networks, strategic development plan for 9th street, and design of a mixed-use building and public space (The last 3 parts took place in Lynchburg, Virginia). To connect these four main “problems” there were “transitional exercises” inserted in between them. With the same critical attention, this paper will analyze the final results, the various stages of the course as well as the areas of overlap between different phases, specially designed to ensure the student’s awareness of the consistency of the complete process.

scholarly journals Variable Arrangements Between Residential and Productive Activities: Conceiving Mixed-Use for Urban Development in Brussels

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 334-349
Author(s):  
Michael Ryckewaert ◽  
Jan Zaman ◽  
Sarah De Boeck
Keyword(s):  
Public Space ◽  
Traffic Congestion ◽  
Urban Areas ◽  
Land Uses ◽  
Economic Activities ◽  
Large Cities ◽  
Functional Relationships ◽  
Shared Spaces ◽  
Mixed Use ◽  
Estate Agency

Mixing productive economic activities with housing is a hot topic in academic and policy discourses on the redevelopment of large cities today. Mixed-use is proposed to reduce adverse effects of modernist planning such as single-use zoning, traffic congestion, and loss of quality in public space. Moreover, productive city discourses plead for the re-integration of industry and manufacturing in the urban tissue. Often, historical examples of successful mixed-use in urban areas serve as a guiding image, with vertical symbiosis appearing as the holy grail of the live-work mix-discourse. This article examines three recent live-work mix projects developed by a public real estate agency in Brussels. We investigate how different spatial layouts shape the links between productive, residential, and other land uses and how potential conflicts between residents and economic actors are mediated. We develop a theoretical framework based on earlier conceptualisations of mixed-use development to analyse the spatial and functional relationships within the projects. We situate them within the housing and productive city policies in Brussels. From this analysis, we conclude that mixed-use should be understood by considering spatial and functional relationships at various scales and by studying the actual spatial layout of shared spaces, logistics and nuisance mitigation. Mixed-use is highly contextual, depending on the characteristics of the area as well as policy goals. The vertical symbiosis between different land uses is but one example of valid mixed-use strategies along with good neighbourship, overlap, and tolerance. As such, future commercial and industrial areas will occur in various degrees of mixity in our cities.

scholarly journals Intensive residential densification: impact on the urban morphology of Santiago de Chile

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Magdalena Vicuña
Keyword(s):  
Public Space ◽  
Urban Space ◽  
Urban Morphology ◽  
Urban Fabric ◽  
Land Occupation ◽  
Santiago De Chile ◽  
Mixed Use ◽  
Building Footprint ◽  
Main Effects ◽  
The Impact

Santiago de Chile´s areas of growing centrality are currently under residential densification processes, which vary in degrees of intensity and forms of impact in the urban environment. As a result of a weak conduction of residential densification, the structural-radical transformation of the urban fabric has resulted in urban space degradation. However, residential densification is a form of urban growth that, well designed and planned, allows optimizing infrastructures and building a more complex and inclusive city. This work aims to understand to what extent urban morphology shapes these processes of urban transformation in 15 selected areas of 25 hectares; proposing typologies of residential densification based on the intensity of the process and the state of transformation of the urban fabric. Density (dwellings/hectare) is understood in systemic relation with those parameters that determine urban compactness and configure public space: lot subdvision composition, setbacks, building footprint and height, floor area ratio and mixed use index, among others. The impact of intensive densification on urban space would have three main effects: (1) the standardized tower radically fragments the fabric structure and skyline, to the extent multiple and dispersed vertical operations transform lot geometry, abruptly increase building height and lower land occupation; (2) triggers a "residentialization" effect, unbalancing existing diversity of activities and contributing to undermine urban vitality; and (3) impairs the quality of public space, by introducing exogenous typological elements (such as setbacks) and reducing contact between private space and the street.

scholarly journals Gender, Public Space and Resistance

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gülsüm Baydar
Keyword(s):  
Public Space ◽  
Prime Minister ◽  
Central Area ◽  
Small Scale ◽  
Local Planning ◽  
Central Park ◽  
Starting Point ◽  
Government Planning ◽  
The Government ◽  
Gendered Roles

On May 27, 2013 at 11:30 pm bulldozers drove into Gezi, a central park in Taksim, Istanbul, to uproot five trees in preparation for future construction. Plans for the redevelopment had been announced two years before by the Prime Minister, Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and in response, two local activist groups had been formed: ‘Taksim Solidarity’ and the ‘Society for the Preservation and Beautification of Gezi Park’. Founded to to publicise the historical status of the park and protect what remains a symbolically important site - and one of the few recreation areas in the central area of Istanbul - members of these groups were amongst the first to protest as the bulldozers rolled in. Within hours, a group of twenty to thirty activists had begun a sit-in. In the coming days, as the number of demonstrators increased to hundreds, the ‘resistance’ spread to other neighbourhoods in Istanbul. It also manifest itself in other cities across the country. The small scale sit-in that commenced in the night of May 27th had become a catalyst for a nationwide movement with global repercussions. It subsequently became known, interchangeably, as the Gezi movement, the Gezi resistance and Gezi events. The space of the protests was no longer bounded by Gezi Park itself, and the movement was no longer limited to a specific and local planning agenda. Taking criticism of the renovation plans for Taksim as their starting point, the protesters also raised their voices against what they considered the authoritarian policies of the the conservative government and, more specifically, the social pronouncements of the Prime Minister. The governmental response was violent police intervention. Within a month, five protesters and one policeman had died, hundreds of others were injured, and many protestors were arrested across the country. In the midst of what the government defined as anarchy and subversive acts, multiple social and cultural assumptions were overturned and, in Deleuze and Guattari’s terms, events and behaviours were deterritiorialized. Transient actions in established spaces smoothed the striated spaces of government planning and, equally significantly, a radical and momentary reconceptualisation of gendered roles and spaces was established.

scholarly journals The first open public space in Krasnoyarsk

2021 ◽  
pp. 112-119
Author(s):  
Olga Blyankinshtein ◽  
Natalya Popkova
Keyword(s):  
Public Space ◽  
General System ◽  
International Competition ◽  
Central Park ◽  
Spatial Transformations ◽  
Green Areas ◽  
Development Concept ◽  
The City

Krasnoyarsk parks are studied in the general system of green areas of the city. The Central Park of Krasnoyarsk is analyzed in detail, its evolution is traced through its periods. The planning, landscape and architectural-spatial transformations of the garden-park territory have been studied and illustrated. The prospects for the development of the park are outlined on the basis of a review of project proposals and the results of an Open International Competition for the development concept of Gorky Central Park in Krasnoyarsk in 2020. The principles of a good park have been formulated.

TO THE PROBLEMS OF REVITALIZATION OF PUBLIC SPACES IN EASTERN BLOC HOUSING ESTATES

2013 ◽  
Vol 37 (3) ◽  
pp. 165-172
Author(s):  
Martin Veselý ◽  
Lukáš Vacek
Keyword(s):  
Public Space ◽  
Public Spaces ◽  
Eastern Bloc ◽  
Central Park ◽  
Urban Planner ◽  
Anthropological Research ◽  
Planning Methods ◽  
To Come ◽  
Housing Estates ◽  
Complementary Analysis

The article is a contribution to the discussion about the revitalizations of over-dimensioned and characterless public spaces in housing estates areas in the Eastern Bloc. The Central Park in Southern Town I – the largest housing estate in Prague – is a significant example of such public space. The article presents the main results of two different but complementary analysis of the Central Park. Analysis “from bellow” (the user's perspective) is based on the results of anthropological research in the area. Analysis “from above” is based on personal experience of an urban planner. According to the authors only the triangulation of anthropological and architectural/urban planning methods of reading place allows to come near to complex understanding of place, its character and identity. The authors point out the importance of participation of the users in the revitalizations, which is an important condition of the broad acceptance of the result. Most of the Czech municipalities are still mistrustful of participatory processes. That brings many unnecessary problems.

scholarly journals Arquitecturas para el juego en Central Park: aventuras contra la apatía

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Juan José Tuset Davó
Keyword(s):  
New York ◽  
Public Space ◽  
Radical Change ◽  
Concrete Wall ◽  
Central Park ◽  
Children's Play ◽  
Personal Learning ◽  
Children’S Play ◽  
Specific Object ◽  
Natural Separation

Children's play architectures propose new uses for urban public space. The intervention of the New York architect Richard Dattner with his "Adventure playground" (1967) in Central Park creates a children's play environment from formal anarchy in which children can imagine their own ways of playing. The proposal of elemental architectures that encourage children to be adventurous was opposed to the apathy inherited from the conservative institutionalized design. Structures linked by a slightly winding concrete wall define living and playing spaces by creating a natural separation of the children's and the adult's environment. The concatenation of iconic forms of children’s plays aims to choreograph the child's personal learning experiences. Dattner's project is the architectural expression of a bold play program. It represents the rebellious attitude of young architects of advanced ideology. It symbolizes the radical change in thinking about the design of the public playground. It considers the need to involve the community in the project phase and is a contribution to the artistic avant-garde movements that vindicated the specific object of minimal expression.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document