The relationship between physical restraint and the diagnosis and drug use in the patients receiving inpatient treatment in a child and adolescent psychiatry clinic

2018 ◽  
pp. 1 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arif Önder ◽  
Aslı Adanır ◽  
Canem Kavurma ◽  
Öznur Bilaç ◽  
Gülçin Uzunoğlu ◽  
...  
2017 ◽  
Vol 41 (5) ◽  
pp. 582-586 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cassandra A. Murzl ◽  
Tyler A. Durns ◽  
Lorin T. Mowrey ◽  
Andrew S. Tubbs ◽  
Sally A. Boeve

BJPsych Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (S1) ◽  
pp. S34-S34
Author(s):  
Darpan Kaur ◽  
Sanay Patani ◽  
Rishab Verma ◽  
Rakesh Ghildiyal

AimsTo assess the profile of Sleep pattern, Psychiatric comorbidity and problematic electronic gadget use and explore demographic factors and correlations in children and adolescents with ADHD and Autism.Hypothesis: There are statistically significant problems and associations across sleep pattern, psychiatric comorbidity and gadget use in children and adolescents with autism and ADHD.BackgroundLiterature highlights increasing global trends and emerging concerns over the problematic use of electronic gadgets and sleep related problems in children and adolescents with autism and ADHD. There is sparse literature on the profile of sleep patterns, psychiatry comorbidity and problematic gadget use in children and adolescents with autism and ADHD from developing countries.MethodThis was an observational study conducted at the Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Clinic, Department of Psychiatry at a tertiary care Institution under the STS ICMR Project 2019 with Institutional Ethics Clearance. Apriori Sample size calculated was 70. Children and adolescents diagnosed with autism or ADHD as per ICD 10 criteria, fulfilling the inclusion criteria and willing to participate in the study were included. Informed consent was obtained from caregivers. Sleep Disturbance Scale for Children, Self Designed Parent based Problematic Electronic Gadget Use Scale, Vanderbilt ADHD scale, Indian scale for Assessment of Autism and the Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Clinic structured Performa were the tools for data collection. The results were analyzed with descriptive tests, chi square test and multiple logistic regressions using SPSS.ResultMean age of the sample was 9.1 years and majority (57%) were boys. Forty nine patients had ADHD and 21 patients had Autism. Problematic gadget use was higher in children ranging from 6 to 15 years of age and 12.8% had severe levels of problematic gadget use. 34.3% patients experienced severe problems in initiating and maintaining sleep. Oppositional-Defiant disorder was the most common comorbidity, predominantly inattentive type (76.4%) was the most common subtype of ADHD and mild autism (54.3%) was the most common type of autism in the sample. There were statistically significant associations (p < 0.05) between age and gadget use; hyperactive subtype of ADHD and problems with initiating and maintaining sleep and ADHD subtype, sex profile and problematic gadget use.ConclusionWe conclude that sleep problems, psychiatric comorbidity and problematic gadget use are prevalent with statistically significant associations in children and adolescents with autism and ADHD as per our study findings. Our study has relevant clinical, research and policy implications.


2015 ◽  
Vol 30 (5) ◽  
pp. 583-589 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. Boege ◽  
N. Corpus ◽  
R. Schepker ◽  
R. Kilian ◽  
J.M. Fegert

AbstractBackgroundAdmission rate to child and adolescent mental health inpatient units in Germany is high (54 467 admissions in 2013), resources for providing necessary beds are scarce. Alternative pathways to care are needed. Objective of this study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of inpatient treatment versus Hot-BITs-treatment (Hometreatment brings inpatient-treatment outside), a new supported discharge service offering an early discharge followed by 12 weeks of intensive support.MethodsOf 164 consecutively recruited children and adolescents, living within families and being in need of inpatient mental health care, 100 patients consented to participate and were randomised via a computer-list into intervention (n = 54) and control groups (n = 46). Follow-up data were available for 76 patients. Primary outcome was cost-effectiveness. Effectiveness was gathered by therapist-ratings on the Children's Global Assessment Scale (CGAS) at baseline (T1), treatment completion (T2) and an 8-month-follow-up (T3). Cost of service use (health care costs and non–health care costs) was calculated on an intention-to-treat basis at T2 and T3.ResultsSignificant treatment effects were observed for both groups between T1/T2 and T1/T3 (P < 0.001). The Hot-BITs treatment, however, was associated with significantly lower costs at T2 (difference: −6900.47€, P = 0.013) and T3 (difference: −8584.10€, P = 0.007). Bootstrap cost-effectiveness ratio indicated that Hot-BITs was less costly and tended to be more effective at T2 and T3.ConclusionsHot-BITs may be a feasible cost-effective alternative to long inpatient stays in child and adolescent psychiatry. Further rigorous evaluations of the model are required. (Registration number: ISRCTN02672532, part 1, Current Controlled Trials Ltd, URL: http://www.controlled-trials.com).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document