PREDICTIVE VALUE OF SIMPLE BIOMARKERS OF MORTALITY IN PATIENTS WITH SEVERE HEART FAILURE IN EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT IN SUEZ CANAL UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL IN ISMAILIA

Author(s):  
Khaled Salama ◽  
Monira Ismail ◽  
Hanan Kamal ◽  
Basant Mousa
2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Case Newsom ◽  
Rebecca Jeanmonod ◽  
Karl Weller ◽  
Nabil Boutros ◽  
Mark Reiter ◽  
...  

Objectives. We sought to validate and refine a decision rule for chest X-ray (CXR) utilization in nontraumatic chest pain (CP) patients presenting to the emergency department (ED). Methods. Retrospective review of ED patients presenting with CP who had CXR performed during three nonconsecutive months was performed. The presence of 18 variables derived from history and exam was ascertained. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of the original rule were calculated. Refinement using additional variables was performed. Results. 967 patient charts were reviewed. 89.9% of CXR were normal, 5.2% had insignificant findings, and 5.1% had significant findings. Application of the criteria had a sensitivity/specificity of 74%/59% and a PPV/ NPV of 9%/98%. Rule modification to obtain CXR for age ≥ 65 years, history of congestive heart failure and alcohol abuse, and exam findings of decreased breath sounds, fever, and tachypnea maintained sensitivity while improving specificity to 69%. Conclusions. Most CP patients have normal CXRs. Narrowing a decision rule to obtain CXR in patients with age ≥ 65 years, history of congestive heart failure and alcohol abuse, and exam findings of decreased breath sounds, fever, and tachypnea maintain sensitivity while improving specificity and NPV.


2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohamed Amine Msolli ◽  
◽  
Adel Sekma ◽  
Maryem Ben Marzouk ◽  
Wael Chaabane ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Ultrasonographic B-lines have recently emerged as a bedside imaging tool for the differential diagnosis of acute dyspnea in the Emergency Department (ED). However, despite its simplicity, LUS has not fully penetrated emergency department. This study aimed to assess the accuracy and reproducibility of ultrasonographic B-lines performed by emergency medicine (EM) residents for the diagnosis of congestive heart failure (CHF) in patients admitted to ED for acute dyspnea. Patients and methods This is a cross-sectional prospective study conducted between January 2016 and October 2017 including patients aged over 18 years admitted to ED for acute dyspnea. At admission, two consecutive bedside LUS study were performed by a pair of EM residents who received a 2-h course for recognition of sonographic B-lines to determine independently B-lines score and B-profile pattern. All participating sonographers were blinded to patients’ clinical data. B-lines score ≥ 15 or a B-profile pattern was considered as suggestive of CHF. The final leading diagnosis was assessed by two expert sonographers, who were blinded to the residents’ interpretations, based on clinical findings, chest X-ray, brain natriuretic peptide, cardiac and lung ultrasound testing. Accuracy and agreement of B-lines score and B-profile pattern were calculated. Results We included 700 patients with a mean age of 68 ± 12.6 years and a sex ratio (M/F) of 1.43. The diagnosis of CHF was recorded in 371 patients (53%). The diagnostic performance of B-lines score at a cut-off 15 and B-profile pattern was, respectively, 88% and 82.5% for sensitivity, 75% and 84% for specificity, 80% and 85% for positive predictive value, 84% and 81% for negative predictive value. The area under receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.86 [0.83–0.89] and 0.83 [0.80–0.86], respectively, for B-lines score and B-profile pattern. There was an excellent agreement between residents for the diagnosis of CHF using both scores (kappa = 0.81 and 0.85, respectively, for ordinal scale B-lines score and B-profile pattern). Conclusion Lung ultrasound B-lines assessment has a good accuracy and an excellent reproducibility in the diagnosis of CHF in the hand of EM residents following a short training program. Trial registration Name of the registry: clinicaltrials.gov; Trial registration number: NCT03717779; Date of registration: October 24, 2018 ‘Retrospectively registered’; URL of trial registry record: clinicaltrials.gov


2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (6) ◽  
pp. 1844
Author(s):  
Nashwa M. Abdelgeleel ◽  
Khaled Morsy Salama ◽  
Mohamed A. Ali ◽  
Aasha N. Elsagher

Background: Trauma is a serious global health problem, it is the fifth leading cause of significant disability and is still the most frequent cause of death in the first four decades of life, accounting for approximately one in 10 deaths worldwide.Methods: This study is cross sectional prospective study was conducted to evaluate assessment of management of patients according to the advanced trauma life support guideline in Emergency Department at Suez Canal University Hospital. All patients (n=103) were subjected to baseline assessment by history, clinical examination and investigations. The patients were followed up and recorded till the full assessment was done and the decision was made and the fate of the patient was recorded.Results: The majority of the studied patient had motor car crash (55.30%), while motor cycle crash was the second mechanism of trauma (21.40%), run over was the third mechanism (14.60%). Airway management was done (95.1%), cervical spine kept immobilized only in (71.8%). Blood pressure was measured in (97.1%) and 2ry survey assessment, head to toe examination (78.6%), while AMPLE history was taken in minority of cases percentage (33%). Finally majority of patients was admitted in ICU (44.70%), followed by 18.40% of the studied patient died and less than (2%) discharged from the ER.Conclusions: ATLS protocols provide a common framework and organized approach during polytrauma patient’s management. Also, it has been shown to improve outcomes so we should enhance its application in our hospital.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document