Motivating Nurses to Perform & Stay: Improving Lives through Initiating Structure Leadership

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 (1) ◽  
pp. 10235
Author(s):  
Fred Ochieng Walumbwa ◽  
I-Chieh Hsu ◽  
Ju Chien Cindy Wu ◽  
Everlyne Misati ◽  
Amanda Christensen-Salem
Keyword(s):  
2019 ◽  
Vol 49 (2) ◽  
pp. 491-515 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dongwon Choi ◽  
Minyoung Cheong ◽  
Jihye Lee

Purpose While the Ohio State leadership approach had been forgotten for several decades, scholars in the field of leadership have begun revisiting the validity and the role of leader consideration and initiating structure. Building on self-expansion theory, this study suggest the effects of leader consideration and initiating structure on employee task performance. Also, integrating self-expansion theory and regulatory fit theory, the purpose of this paper is to propose and examine the moderating role of employee regulatory focus on the relationship between the Ohio State leadership behaviors and employee task performance, which was mediated by emloyees’ creative behavior as well as citizenship behavior. Design/methodology/approach To test the hypothesized model of this study, cross-sectional data were collected using questionnaires. Pairs of survey packages, which included group-member surveys and a group-leader survey, were handed out to employees in organizations. The authors collected data from 47 groups and 143 group members in 25 private companies in the Republic of Korea, including from financial, technology, manufacturing, and research and development organizations. Findings The results showed that leader consideration exerts significant effects on employee task performance. Also, the authors found the moderating role of employee regulatory promotion focus on the relationship between leader consideration/initiating structure and employee task performance, which were mediated by creative behavior and citizenship behavior. Originality/value This study contributes to the advancement of the Ohio State leadership approach by integrating self-expansion theory and regulatory fit theory to investigate the distinct mechanisms and boundary conditions of its leadership process. The current study also contributes to the literature on extra-role behavior that the Ohio State leadership behavioral dimensions can be considered as one of the antecedents of employees’ creative and citizenship behavior.


2000 ◽  
Vol 29 (6) ◽  
pp. 555-564 ◽  
Author(s):  
O.C Ferrell ◽  
Thomas N Ingram ◽  
Raymond W LaForge

1977 ◽  
Vol 41 (2) ◽  
pp. 431-434
Author(s):  
Joseph C. Bledsoe ◽  
Sidney E. Brown

A factor analysis of responses from 136 Georgia public school superintendents to the short-form Leader Behavior Description Questionnaire yielded a single factor, Global Perceptions of Leader Behavior, instead of the usual two factors, Consideration and Initiating Structure. This factor accounted for 41.1% of the variance. The two factors were correlated .69. Plausible interpretations of the nonindependence for this population were discussed.


2016 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 106-115 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caroline Kranabetter ◽  
Cornelia Niessen

Abstract. The purpose of this study is (1) to investigate how managers act in situations when employees are exhausted and (2) to compare these leadership behaviors to more general, context-independent leadership styles (transformational leadership, consideration, initiating structure). Interviews with 48 managers of different industries were used to examine how managers respond to exhausted employees. Based on action regulation theory, interview protocols provided insight into managers’ information collection, planning, execution of actions, and feedback processing when responding to exhausted employees. In addition, context-specific leadership behaviors were identified and compared to prominent leadership styles. Managers highlighted redesigning the task and emotionally supporting the employee as particularly useful in situations when employees are exhausted.


2003 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronald F. Piccolo ◽  
Timothy A. Judge ◽  
Remus Ilies
Keyword(s):  

1974 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 62-82 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven Kerr ◽  
Chester A. Schriesheim ◽  
Charles J. Murphy ◽  
Ralph M. Stogdill

1981 ◽  
Vol 41 (4) ◽  
pp. 1101-1114 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chester A. Schriesheim ◽  
Kenneth D. Hill

The prevailing conventional wisdom is that it is advisable to mix positively and negatively worded items in psychological measures to counteract acquiescence response bias. However, there has been virtually no unambiguous empirical evidence to support this recommendation. Thus, an experiment was conducted to evaluate the ability of subjects to respond accurately to both positive and reversed (negative) items on a questionnaire. Items from the LBDQ—XII Initiating Structure and Consideration subscales were used to create a written description of a fictitious manager. One hundred-fifty subjects, all upper-division business undergraduates, were given the written managerial description and then asked to complete a questionnaire containing the twenty Initiating Structure and Consideration items. The managerial descriptions were in two forms (to portray high and low Initiating Structure), and the questionnaires contained items in three forms (all positively worded, all negatively worded, and mixed). The data were evaluated using a one-way analysis of variance and post hoc t-tests. Significant differences in response accuracy were found between the item wording conditions. It was concluded that it may not be advisable to employ reversed (negatively-worded) items to control acquiescence response bias, as such changes may actually impair response accuracy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document