Makers and Breakers: An Examination of Social Norm Emergence and Deviance in Organizations

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 (1) ◽  
pp. 14129
Author(s):  
Daniel Feiler ◽  
Hana Shepherd ◽  
Shu Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Author(s):  
Bastin Tony Roy Savarimuthu ◽  
Maryam Purvis ◽  
Martin Purvis ◽  
Stephen Cranefield

2019 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 409-431
Author(s):  
Lina Eriksson

Social norm emergence is commonly explained by stating that norms serve certain functions – for example, solving cooperation or coordination problems. But critics argue that examples of norms that do not seem to serve functions show that functions cannot explain social norms. However, both sides tend to make assumptions about how explanations of social norms in terms of functions would work. By discussing four problems for these assumptions, I will show that they are over-simplified. Instead of asking whether norms serve functions, we need to ask more specific questions about the relationship between the norm and the function it supposedly serves.


2020 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 119-143
Author(s):  
Chien Liu

How a social norm emerges has been studied extensively. However, how a norm collapses has rarely been addressed in the literature. In this article, extending the theories of norm emergence by Coleman and Axelrod, I propose a theory of norm collapse. This theory specifies one micro mechanism and macro–micro–macro process through which a norm likely decays and eventually collapses. Then, as a test, I use computer simulation to simulate the process of the norm emergence and collapse. The result of the computer simulation demonstrates that the proposed theory has internal logical consistency. Finally, I conclude by discussing some implication of this research.


Author(s):  
Jennifer E. Dannals ◽  
Dale T. Miller

Social norms are a powerful force in organizations. While different literatures across fields have developed differing definitions and categories, social norms are commonly defined as and divided into descriptive norms, i.e., the most commonly enacted behavior, and prescriptive norms, i.e., the behavior most commonly viewed as acceptable or appropriate. Different literatures have also led to differing focuses of investigation for social norms research. Economic theorists have tended to examine social norm emergence by studying how social norms evolve to reduce negative or create positive externalities in situations. Organizational theorists and sociologists have instead focused on the social pressures which maintain social norms in groups over time, and eventually can lead group members to internalize the social norm. In contrast, social psychologists have tended to focus on how to use social norms in interventions aimed at reducing negative behaviors. Integrating these divergent streams of research proves important for future research.


2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 41-60
Author(s):  
Sungjee Choi ◽  
Inwoo Nam ◽  
Jaehwan Kim

2018 ◽  
Vol 26 (7) ◽  
pp. 1284
Author(s):  
Weiyang CHEN ◽  
Tian XIE
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document