scholarly journals Affect regulation in psychoanalytic treatments of patients with a borderline personality disorder–psychoanalysis and psychodynamic psychotherapy–a comparison

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (12) ◽  
pp. 1328-1345
Author(s):  
Dagmar Steinmair ◽  
Guoruey Wong ◽  
Sophie Frantal ◽  
Christine Rohm ◽  
Henriette Löffler-Stastka
Psychotherapy ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 45 (1) ◽  
pp. 28-41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert J. Gregory ◽  
Susan Chlebowski ◽  
David Kang ◽  
Anna L. Remen ◽  
Maureen G. Soderberg ◽  
...  

BMJ Open ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (10) ◽  
pp. e022694 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lars Schulze ◽  
Paul-Christian Bürkner ◽  
Julian Bohländer ◽  
Ulrike Zetsche

IntroductionAffective disturbances and difficulty in affect regulation are core features of major depressive disorder (MDD) as well as borderline personality disorder (BPD). Whereas depressed individuals are characterised by affective inertia, individuals with BPD are characterised by affective instability. Both groups have been found to use more maladaptive affect regulation strategies than healthy controls. Surprisingly, however, there have been hardly any studies directly comparing these two disorders to disentangle shared and disorder-specific deficits in affective dynamics and affect regulation.Furthermore, theoretical models link deficits in affect regulation to deficits in cognitive control functions. Given that individuals with MDD or BPD are both characterised by impairments in cognitive control, the present study will further examine the link between individual differences in cognitive control and disturbances in affect dynamics and regulation in the daily life of individuals with MDD or BPD.Methods and analysesWe will use a smartphone application to assess negative and positive affect as well as affect regulation strategies at eight times a day for 7 days. We will further employ four computerised tasks to assess two cognitive control functions, namely interference control and discarding irrelevant information from working memory. Our hypotheses will be tested using a multimethod approach. Power analyses determined a sample size of 159 (53 MDD, 53 BPD, 53 controls) to detect medium effect sizes.Ethics and disseminationEthics approval has been obtained from the Freie Universität Berlin. Data collection started in January 2017 and will last until the end of 2018. Results will be disseminated to relevant psychotherapeutic and patient communities in peer-reviewed journals, and at scientific conferences.


Author(s):  
Barbara Stanley ◽  
Tanya Singh

The diagnosis of borderline personality disorder (BPD) can be devastating. BPD is characterized by instability on several domains: affect regulation, impulse control, interpersonal relationships, and self-image, and it affects about 1–2% of the general population—up to 10% of psychiatric outpatients, and 20% of inpatients. In addition to meeting the criteria set forth in DSM-5, BPD, like all personality disorders, is characterized by a pervasive and persistent pattern of behavior that begins in early childhood and is stable across contexts. Affective dysregulation (inappropriate, intense anger or difficulty controlling anger; affective instability due to a marked reactivity of mood), is one of the core domains associated with BPD and is characterized by erratic, easily aroused mood changes and disproportionate emotional responses. Affect dysregulation differs in BPD and mood disorders because in BPD it can shift rapidly and is affected by environmental triggers.


2009 ◽  
Vol 24 (S1) ◽  
pp. 1-1
Author(s):  
S. Herpertz

Individuals diagnosed with borderline personality disorder usually seek for treatment as adolescents or young adults. As age progresses, longitudinal studies suggest that borderline patients improve psychosocially, suggesting that they may somewhat belatedly achieve the milestones of young adulthood. Affect regulation may be particularly subject to major changes in young adulthood, as the prefrontal brain areas involved in affective processing underlie maturation processes up into the late third decade. From studies in healthy volunteers we know that that the capacity to process positive affects improves with age. Young adults with borderline personality disorder, however, display a negativity bias in emotion recognition and they have difficulties in inhibiting the recall of negative information. Neuroimaging data suggest that they suffer from deficient implicit affect regulation but they are able to profit from explicit strategies to suppress negative emotions, an observation which could have interesting implications for treatment. Regarding future research more efforts on developmental psychopathology on the one hand, brain maturation on the other will help to further understand the nature of borderline personality disorder. Regarding clinical issues early treatment designed to foster affect regulating competencies and self-esteem and to develop interpersonal skills might benefit young patients diagnosed with borderline personality disorder.


1999 ◽  
Vol 33 (6) ◽  
pp. 831-840 ◽  
Author(s):  
Russell Meares ◽  
Janine Stevenson ◽  
Evian Gordon

Objective: The aim of this paper is to develop an aetiological model for borderline personality disorder. Method: The postulates of Hughlings Jackson are used to provide a preliminary explanatory framework for borderline phenomena. As a necessary background to this discussion, the findings concerning abuse in the early history of borderline personality disorder (BPD) and other conditions, notably somatisation disorder and dissociative states, are briefly reviewed. Other data, including family studies, which might have significance in the aetiology of BPD are also reviewed. Results: The hypothesis is put forward that the symptoms of BPD are due to the failure of ‘experience-dependent’ maturation of a cascade of neural networks, with prefrontal connections, which become active relatively late in development and which coordinate disparate elements of central nervous system function. These networks subserve higher psychological functions, including attentional focus and affect regulation. They also underpin the reflective function necessary to the emergence of self as the stream of consciousness, which appears at about the age of 4 years. Conclusion: Adverse developmental circumstances may produce an interrelated set of symptom clusters, with associated neural network disturbances that are amenable to investigation with psychometric and brain imaging techniques. Since these disturbances are seen as ‘experience-dependent’, they are considered reversible, at least in part.


Author(s):  
Jens Tasche

This article presents ten theses containing theoretical considerations for a postgraduate curriculum as currently tested by the Polish Society for Bioenergetic Analysis. The bioenergetic notion of the self, of affect regulation and of mental defense are modified in order to allow for psychodynamic conflict-, structureand trauma-pathological concepts to be integrated into Bioenergetic Analysis. Among other advantages, this approach facilitates the work with structural disorders (narcissism, borderline personality disorder) in Bioenergetic Analysis.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document