scholarly journals Evaluation of Tetrazolium Violet and Resazurin Assays for Ciprofloxacin Susceptibility Testing of Resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis Isolates

2013 ◽  
pp. 49-58
Author(s):  
Emrah RUH ◽  
Hamdiye Yeşim ÖCAL ◽  
Pınar YURDAKUL ◽  
Zeynep SARIBAŞ ◽  
Alpaslan ALP
Keyword(s):  
Mycobacterium Tuberculosis ◽  
Susceptibility Testing ◽  
Tetrazolium Violet

scholarly journals Evaluation of Etest Strips for Rapid Susceptibility Testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis

2002 ◽  
Vol 40 (6) ◽  
pp. 2282-2284 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. M. Freixo ◽  
P. C. S. Caldas ◽  
F. Martins ◽  
R. C. Brito ◽  
R. M. C. Ferreira ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mycobacterium Tuberculosis ◽  
Susceptibility Testing

scholarly journals Comparison of Proportion and Resistance Ratio Methods for Drug Susceptibility Testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Isolated from Patients Attending National Tuberculosis Centre, Nepal

2010 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-20
Author(s):  
S Acharya ◽  
P Ghimire ◽  
DK Khadka ◽  
S Nepali
Keyword(s):  
Mycobacterium Tuberculosis ◽  
Fluorescence Microscopy ◽  
Susceptibility Testing ◽  
Drug Susceptibility ◽  
Drug Susceptibility Testing ◽  
Resistance Ratio ◽  
National Tuberculosis ◽  
Smear Negative ◽  
Culture Positive ◽  
Good Agreement

Background: Tuberculosis (TB) is among the most serious infectious cause of global morbidity and mortality. Emergence of Multi-drug resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) is posing an increased threat to TB control programs. Drug susceptibility testing (DST) of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (M. tuberculosis) isolates is important for tackling such problems. Setting: National Tuberculosis Centre (NTC), Thimi, Bhaktapur, Nepal. Objectives: Comparative evaluation of two in vitro DST methods in determining susceptibility of M. tuberculosis isolates from patients attending NTC, to front-line anti-TB drugs: (Isoniazid-INH, Rifampicin-RFP, Streptomycin-SM, and Ethambutol-EMB). Methodology: This study was conducted from Sep 2006-Jun 2007. A total of 862 sputum samples (diagnosis or follow up cases) collected from patients (type of patients or their categories was not differentiated in this study) attending NTC bacteriology lab for sputum direct smear microscopy were analyzed using fluorescence microscopy. All smear positive samples, smear negative samples requested for culture were cultured. All culture positive samples confirmed as M. tuberculosis by biochemical tests were processed for DST by both proportion (PR) and resistance ratio (RR) methods. Results: Out of 862 sputum samples analyzed, 226 (26.2%) samples were positive for Acid Fast Bacilli (AFB) by fluorescence microscopy. Among 323 samples 226 smear positive samples and 97 smear negative samples requested for culture), 221 (68.4%) were culture positive, 92 (28.5%) were culture negative and 10 (3.1%) were contaminated. Out of 221 isolates of M. tuberculosis, 57.5% were resistant to one or more drugs by the PR method and 56.6% by the RR method. Similarly, MDR isolates were 29.9% and 29% by PR and RR methods respectively. On correlation analysis using Mc Nemar Chi-square test, no significant difference between the two tests were observed (p>0.05). The results showed high agreement between both methods and agreement rates to INH, RFP, SM and EMB were 93.2%, 93.7%, 93.2% and 94.1% respectively. Similarly, the agreement rates between both methods using kappa analysis showed kappa (k) value of 0.86, 0.85, 0.86 and 0.84 for INH, RFP, SM and EMB respectively, which is believed to be good agreement between both methods (k=0.80 to 1.00: Very good agreement). Conclusion: In conclusion, this study showed that both the Proportion and Resistance ratio methods are equally good for determining drug susceptibility of M. tuberculosis. Keywords: Mycobacterium tuberculosis; Drug Susceptibility Testing; Proportion Method; Resistance Ratio Method. DOI: 10.3126/saarctb.v5i1.3078 SAARC J. Tuber. Lung Dis. HIV/AIDS 2008 Vol.5(1) 13-20

scholarly journals Comparison of the Performances of Two In-House Rapid Methods for Antitubercular Drug Susceptibility Testing

2008 ◽  
Vol 53 (2) ◽  
pp. 808-810 ◽  
Author(s):  
Agustina I. de la Iglesia ◽  
Emma J. Stella ◽  
Héctor R. Morbidoni
Keyword(s):  
Drug Resistance ◽  
Mycobacterium Tuberculosis ◽  
Sensitivity And Specificity ◽  
Susceptibility Testing ◽  
Drug Susceptibility ◽  
Drug Susceptibility Testing ◽  
Antitubercular Drug ◽  
Rapid Methods ◽  
Resistance Assessment

ABSTRACT Resistance to rifampin (rifampicin), isoniazid, and streptomycin of 69 Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates was analyzed by an in-house method based on mycobacteriophage D29 and a colorimetric micromethod. Both methods showed sensitivity and specificity values ranging from 93% to 100%. These simple methods offer an option for drug resistance assessment of M. tuberculosis.

scholarly journals Increasing prevalence of resistance to second-line drugs among multidrug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates in Kuwait

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Noura M. Al-Mutairi ◽  
Suhail Ahmad ◽  
Eiman Mokaddas
Keyword(s):  
Drug Resistance ◽  
Mycobacterium Tuberculosis ◽  
Mutation Detection ◽  
Susceptibility Testing ◽  
Multidrug Resistant ◽  
Genetic Mutations ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Injectable Drugs ◽  
Mdr Tb ◽  
Phenotypic Susceptibility

AbstractMolecular methods detect genetic mutations associated with drug resistance. This study detected resistance-conferring mutations in gyrA/gyrB for fluoroquinolones and rrs/eis genes for second-line injectable drugs (SLIDs) among multidrug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MDR-TB) isolates in Kuwait. Fifty pansusceptible M. tuberculosis and 102 MDR-TB strains were tested. Phenotypic susceptibility testing was performed by MGIT 960 system using SIRE drug kit. GenoType MTBDRsl version 1 (gMTBDRslv1) and GenoType MTBDRsl version 2 (gMTBDRslv2) tests were used for mutation detection. Results were validated by PCR-sequencing of respective genes. Fingerprinting was performed by spoligotyping. No mutations were detected in pansusceptible isolates. gMTBDRslv1 detected gyrA mutations in 12 and rrs mutations in 8 MDR-TB isolates. gMTBDRsl2 additionally detected gyrB mutations in 2 and eis mutation in 1 isolate. Mutations in both gyrA/gyrB and rrs/eis were not detected. gMTBDRslv1 also detected ethambutol resistance-conferring embB mutations in 59 isolates. Although XDR-TB was not detected, frequency of resistance-conferring mutations for fluoroquinolones or SLIDs was significantly higher among isolates collected during 2013–2019 versus 2006–2012. Application of both tests is warranted for proper management of MDR-TB patients in Kuwait as gMTBDRslv2 detected resistance to fluoroquinolones and/or SLIDs in 3 additional isolates while gMTBDRslv1 additionally detected resistance to ethambutol in 58% of MDR-TB isolates.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document