scholarly journals A Comparative Analysis Of Intraoral 3d Digital Scanners For Restorative Dentistry

10.5580/1b90 ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
Restorative Dentistry

The concerted use of SEM, TEM, and SCM for examination of resin-dentin interfaces

1994 ◽  
Vol 52 ◽  
pp. 476-477
Author(s):  
B. Van Meerbeek ◽  
L. J. Conn ◽  
E. S. Duke
Keyword(s):  
Surface Layer ◽  
Stress Distribution ◽  
Phosphoric Acid ◽  
Bonding Mechanism ◽  
Restorative Dentistry ◽  
Dental Adhesive ◽  
Low Viscosity ◽  
Dentin Adhesives ◽  
Acid Etch ◽  
Tooth Tissue

Restoration of decayed teeth with tooth-colored materials that can be bonded to tooth tissue has been a highly desirable property in restorative dentistry for many years. Advantages of such an adhesive restorative technique over conventional techniques using non-adhesive metal-based restoratives include improved restoration retention with minimal sacrifice of sound tooth tissue for retention purposes, superior adaptation and sealing of the restoration margins in prevention of caries recurrence, improved stress distribution across the tooth-restoration interface throughout the whole tooth, and even reinforcement of weakened tooth structures. The dental adhesive technology is rapidly changing. An efficient resin bond to enamel has already long been achieved. Its bonding mechanism has been fully elucidated and has proven to be a durable and reliable clinical treatment. However, bonding to dentin represents a greater challenge. After the failures of a dentin acid-etch technique in imitation of the enamel phosphoric-acid-etch technique and a bonding procedure based on chemical adhesion, modern dentin adhesives are currently believed to bond to dentin by a micromechanical hybridization process. This process is developed by an initial demineralization of the dentin surface layer with acid etchants exposing a collagen fibril arrangement with interfibrillar microporosities that subsequently become impregnated by low-viscosity monomers. Although the development of such a hybridization process has well been documented in the literature, questions remain with respect to parameters of-primary importance to adhesive efficacy.

Use of different sized models in teaching restorative dentistry

1970 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
pp. 76-82
Author(s):  
JW Wittrock ◽  
WE Dilts
Keyword(s):  
Restorative Dentistry

Student self-evaluation in preclinical restorative dentistry

1982 ◽  
Vol 46 (4) ◽  
pp. 221-226 ◽  
Author(s):  
LS Forehand ◽  
WF Vann ◽  
DA Shugars
Keyword(s):  
Restorative Dentistry ◽  
Self Evaluation

1207: Failed Pyeloplasty in Children: Comparative Analysis of Retrograde Endopyelotomy VS. Re-do Pyeloplasty

2007 ◽  
Vol 177 (4S) ◽  
pp. 398-398
Author(s):  
Luis H. Braga ◽  
Joao L. Pippi Salle ◽  
Sumit Dave ◽  
Sean Skeldon ◽  
Armando J. Lorenzo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Analysis

652: Invade or Proliferate? A Comparative Analysis of Expression of Cell Cycle Regulators in Invasive Margin and Primary Tumor Tissue in Renal Cell Cancer

2005 ◽  
Vol 173 (4S) ◽  
pp. 178-178
Author(s):  
Stephen O. Ikuerowo ◽  
Stefan A. Machtens ◽  
Markus A. Kuczyk ◽  
Udo Jonas ◽  
Juergen Serth
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
Renal Cell Cancer ◽  
Primary Tumor ◽  
Renal Cell ◽  
Tumor Tissue ◽  
Cell Cancer ◽  
Cell Cycle Regulators ◽  
Invasive Margin
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document