Simultaneous treatment of upward migrated DJ stent and proximal ureteral stones: A Case Report

10.5580/250c ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 32-34
Author(s):  
Uday Eknathrao Jadhav ◽  
Raghavendra Chikkatur ◽  
Nageshwar Rao ◽  
Manish Puranik ◽  
Jyoti Magar ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 90 (1) ◽  
pp. 15
Author(s):  
Ercan Ogreden ◽  
Ural Oguz ◽  
Erhan Demirelli ◽  
Erdal Benli ◽  
Özkan Özen

Objective: To evaluate the impact of ureteral stent insertion following semirigid ureterorenoscopy (URS) in patients with perirenal fat stranding (PFS) due to ureteral stones. Material and methods: Data of 600 patients who underwent URS were analyzed retrospectively. Seventy-two patients detected to have PFS accompanying ureteral stone were included. Patients who did not undergo double J (DJ) stent insertion following semirigid URS were classified as Group I (n: 52), while those who underwent stent insertion were classified as Group II (n: 20). Side distribution; localization of the stones, stone size, presence of fever, urinary tract infection (UTIs) and urosepsis rates were compared in the two groups. Results: The average age of the patients was 44.4 (20-71) years. Male/female ratio and side of the stone location showed similar distribution in both groups (p > 0.05). Fever occurred in 23 cases (44.2%) in Group I and in 15 cases (75%) in Group II (p = 0.038). UTIs occurred in 15 cases (28.9%) in Group I and in 12 cases (60%) in Group II (p = 0.03). Urosepsis presented in 3 (5.8%) and 5 (25%) of the patients in Group I and II, respectively (p = 0.033). Conclusions: According to our results, ureteral DJ stent insertion following URS in patients with PFS due to ureteral stone caused an increase on postoperative infection related complications.


2015 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 72-74
Author(s):  
Ali Gur ◽  
Muhammet Gokhan Turtay ◽  
Sukru Gurbuz ◽  
Hakan Oguzturk ◽  
M. Ediz Sarihan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
Vol 38 ◽  
pp. 101650
Author(s):  
Amir Reza Abedi ◽  
Majid Dargahi ◽  
Seyed Jalil Hosseini

2014 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammad Ridha ◽  
Doddy M. Soebadi

Objective: To report patient characteristics and results of Huikang HK-V extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) machine for renal and ureteral stones. Material & methods: We retrospectively analyzed medical records of all patients treated with ESWL using HK-V deviceat Department ofUrology Soetomo Hospital from May2011 - February 2012. Results: There were 241 selected patients, consisted of 148 men (61.4%) and 93 women (38.6%). Mean age was 47.8 years (range 7-87). ESWL was conducted to 130 single stones and 111 multiple stones, using fluoroscopy as guidance for 166 patients, ultrasound for 31 patients (12.9%) and both for 44 patients (18.3%). Stone location was 109 in lower pole(41%), 69 in middle pole(26%), 41 in proximal ureter (16%), 28 in upper pole (11%), 14 at renal pelvis (5%), 1 at distal ureter(0.3%) and 2 staghorn stone (0.7%).There were 130 patients with stone less than 10 mm (53.9%), 102 with stone 10-20 mm (42.3%), and 9 more than 20 mm (3.7%). There were slightly more left-sided treatment was 141 patients (58.5%). Of 181 patients with hydronephrosis (75%), 104 had DJ stent inserted (43.2%). Overall, we found 158 patients (65.5%) were stone free after treatment, 49 patients (20.3%) with residual stones less than 4 mm and 34 patients (14.1%) had more than 4 mm residuals. Conclusion: ESWL is the treatment of choice for simple renal and ureteral stones less than 20 mm (opaque and non opaque).Keywords:Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy, renal stones, ureteral stones.


2021 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Burak Ozkan ◽  
Cemal Ustun ◽  
Enis Rauf Coskuner

Abstract Background Acute appendicitis and acute pyelonephritis are the most common diseases admitted to emergency departments. Both conditions have common symptoms such as flank pain, abdominal pain, and fever. Patients’ history, physical examination, laboratory evaluation, and imaging methods are used to differentiate these two conditions. Diverticulitis, colitis, gynecological pathologies, and ureteral stones that mimic acute appendicitis should be kept in mind as differential diagnoses. Cases of pyelonephritis mimicking acute appendicitis have been reported in the literature, but there has not been a reported case in which acute appendicitis occurs during management of acute pyelonephritis. In this article, a case report which can cause such a diagnostic dilemma has been presented. Case presentation A 42-year-old female patient presented with clinical features suggestive of acute appendicitis that developed after a diagnosis of acute pyelonephritis. She underwent laparoscopic appendectomy on account of acute appendicitis during medical treatment for acute pyelonephritis. Physical examination showed only right costovertebral tenderness without any rebound tenderness at McBurney’s point at the first admission, but during treatment rebound tenderness at McBurney’s point was also detected. The Alvarado score of the patient was 5 at the first admission and 7 when acute appendicitis was diagnosed. The patient fully recovered and was discharged after both diseases were completely treated. Conclusions As seen in this case, it should be remembered that both diseases can be seen together which causes a diagnostic dilemma. If clinical or biochemical progression is detected in a patient under treatment, imaging methods should be repeated and additional ones with higher resolutions should be used.


Author(s):  
Parmod K. Bithal ◽  
Gazi P. Ahmad ◽  
Vandan W. Daniel

AbstractThough propofol infusion syndrome results from a larger dose of infusion over a longer period of time, we observed its development even when it was infused for a shorter period of time. In our patient, it was heralded by progressive acidosis and hyperkalemia. Discontinuation of propofol and simultaneous treatment of hyperkalemia averted any harm to the patient.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document