Group Insurance after the Entry into Force of the Insurance Distribution Act

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (98) ◽  
pp. 3-16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcin Orlicki

The article discusses the principles of the conclusion and execution of group insurance contracts after the entry into force of the Insurance Distribution Act. It particularly analyzes the legal position of the insured (the problem of recognizing them as clients), the scope and shape of the policyholder’s and distributor’s obligations, as well as the responsibility of the policyholder for non-fulfilment or improper fulfilment of these duties.

2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (01) ◽  
pp. 8-23
Author(s):  
Mariusz Fras

Compulsory insurance is present in a vast majority of countries in the world and in all European countries. As international legal relations increasingly intensify, the market of cross-border insurance is also expanding. Despite entry into force of the provisions of the Rome I Regulation and the oncoming reform of the Brussels I bis Regulation, the European private international law, to the extent it governs compulsory insurance, is still a compromise. In the absence of a clear regime under the Rome I Regulation, doubts are still raised by the question of the pursuit for law applicable to group insurance contracts.


2019 ◽  
Vol 66 (3) ◽  
pp. 507-535
Author(s):  
Mariusz Fras

Abstract The provisions on obligations under insurance relationships included in Article 7 of the Rome I Regulation are relatively complicated. However, although individual insurance contracts have their own legal regime in each Member State, only a few national legislators have decided to lay down the consequences of concluding a group insurance agreement. The Rome I Regulation does not include any special conflict of laws rule concerning group insurance contracts, which has been criticized in the literature on the subject.


1983 ◽  
Vol 26 ◽  
pp. 103-129
Author(s):  
J. Lockyer

Group life insurance has attracted little formal discussion in British actuarial circles. Perhaps this is not so surprising. The technical problems posed by group life insurance seem relatively straightforward. Furthermore, there is little doubt that the evolution of present practice has been moulded more by pragmatism than strict theoretical development. None the less, group life insurance is an important sector of our life insurance industry. Figures produced by the Life Offices' Association reveal that in 1980 approximately 7½ million people were covered under group insurance contracts for a total sum assured of the order £63 billion. The development of the group insurance industry in this country has been closely associated with the expansion of private pension provision. Group life cover was seen as an inseparable, but very much secondary, adjunct to the more lucrative field of pensions business. However, over the last decade it has become more likely that a group life scheme will be tendered independently of any related pension business. Thus, the point has long been reached where the underwriting of group life business must be considered as a subject in its own right.


2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (52) ◽  
pp. 29-45
Author(s):  
Marta Anna Szwarczyńska

The multi-stakeholder nature of group insurance contracts triggers various types of connections between the actors in this legal relationship. This is best illustrated by the contract for insurance coverage, which is a separate agreement transacted between the insured and policyholder, but intrinsically linked with group insurance. The aim of this article is to discuss the selected aspects of contracts for insurance coverage. Particular emphasis is put on the insured's right to withdraw from the contract if it was concluded by means of distance communication. The considerations in this respect include examples deriving from case-law practice.


Author(s):  
Mariusz Fras

The entirety of norms on the relations connected with conclusion and performance of insurance contracts make up economic insurance law. Because of its objective homogeneity, it is generally treated as a separate branch of law. From the dogmatic perspective, its permanent element are group insurance contracts. However, the results of a comparative law research allow to draw the conclusion that in a substantial numberof legal systems the term “group insurance” is not to be found in normative acts. In the literature, multiple attempts were made to expound the legal nature of the group insurance contract. Still, there is no consensus as to the nature of the legal relationship arising from conclusion of a group insurance contract. The article concerns the proposal of normative regulation of group insurance contract.


1969 ◽  
pp. 242
Author(s):  
Islam Ahmed Siddiqui

In law, insurance contracts are said to be subject to the doctrine of uberrima fides, i.e., they are contracts of utmost good faith obliging both the insurer and the insured to conform to high standard of conduct, especially regarding disclosure of material facts affecting the appreciation of the risk to be covered. In theory, this doctrine applies equally to the insurer and the insured, but in practice it has come to mean that the insured is under a heavy onus of dis closure when he applies for insurance coverage of any type, either personally or through an insurance agent. The modern doctrines of disclosure originated in the law of marine in surance in 16th century England. At that time, it was not unfair to expect very high standard of disclosure from the insured, because as the owner of the vessel or cargo to be insured, he was in better position than the underwriter to know the nature and extent of the risk to be covered. The underwriter was at comparative disadvantage with regard to the accurate assessment of the risk. The situation is vastly different today, since the insurance industry is wealthy, large and supremely organized. Its expertise in matters of risk assess ment and its corps of trained personnel give it an undoubted advantage over the lay consumer of insurance services. Most risks of an ordinary consumer type are highly standardized, such as automobile coverage, package home owner's coverage, and life insurance coverage. Despite these tremendous changes in the insurance marketplace, the insurer continues to enjoy preferred legal position in the area of disclosure of material facts. As will be seen, the classical doctrine was enunciated by Lord Mansfield in the 18th century and has not changed substantially since then. In the face of well entrenched common law doctrines, the insurance con sumer must rely upon legislative intervention for the fulfillment of his reasonable expectations. However, legislative regulation of standards of dis closure is p


2016 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 209-220
Author(s):  
Petr Dobiáš

Summary Currently, no internationally unified legal regulation of group insurance contracts and reinsurance contracts is available. As a result, a national legal regulation determined according to conflict-of-law rules is applied to both types of contracts in legal relations with an international element. The differences between national legal regulations could be overcome through the application of optional instruments, namely the Principles of the European Insurance Contract Law and the Principles of Reinsurance Contract Law.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document