The effect of Saunders traction and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on the cervical spine range of motion in patients reporting neck pain - pilot study

2012 ◽  
Vol 14 (6) ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrzej Myśliwiec ◽  
Edward Saulicz ◽  
Michał Kuszewski ◽  
Tomasz Wolny ◽  
Mariola Saulicz ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Olabanji O Jogunola

Background: Osteoarthritis (OA), also known as degenerative joint disease, has no curative treatment. However, pharmacological therapies such as acetaminophen, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and more recently etodolac (iodine) are commonly used in its treatment. Non-pharmacological therapy, predominantly physiotherapy, is also employed in the treatment of OA. Objective: This research was aimed at determining the relative therapeutic effectiveness of ketoprofen iontophoresis and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in the management of osteoarthritic knee pain.Methods: Twenty subjects with diagnosis of OA of the knee joint were randomly selected into the ketoprofen iontophoresis group and the transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation group. Both groups received quadriceps strength training in addition to their group therapy. Each subject, who had 3 sessions per week over a four-week period, had a total of 12 treatment sessions. Each treatment session lasted 45 minutes.Results: There was a statistically significant decrease in pain intensity and increase in range of motion in both groups but no significant difference in change in both outcome measures between the groups.Conclusion: Management of OA of the knee using either ketoprofen iontophoresis or transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in addition to quadriceps strengthening exercises in this pilot study was shown to be effective in pain reduction and to increase range of motion. Neither of the interventions was superior. Future studies using a larger sample size are needed to confirm our findings.


2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (15) ◽  
pp. 3245
Author(s):  
Belén Díaz-Pulido ◽  
Yolanda Pérez-Martín ◽  
Daniel Pecos-Martín ◽  
Isabel Rodríguez-Costa ◽  
Milagros Pérez-Muñoz ◽  
...  

Neck pain is a frequent health problem. Manual therapy (MT) and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) are recommended techniques for treatment of mechanical neck disorders (MND) in Spanish Public Primary Care Physiotherapy Services. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of MT versus TENS in active mobility and endurance in cervical subacute or chronic neck pain. Ninety patients with MND were randomly allocated to receive ten 30-min sessions of either MT or TENS, in a multi-centered study through 12 Primary Care Physiotherapy Units in the Madrid community. Active cervical range of motion (CD-ROM) and endurance (Palmer and Epler test) were evaluated pre- and post-intervention and at 6-month follow-up. A generalized linear model of repeated measures was constructed for the analysis of differences. Post-intervention MT yielded a significant improvement in active mobility and endurance in patients with subacute or chronic MND, and at 6-month follow-up the differences were only significant in endurance and in sagittal plane active mobility. In the TENS group, no significant improvement was detected. With regard to other variables, MT improved mobility and endurance more effectively than TENS at post-intervention and at 6-month follow-up in the sagittal plane. Only MT generated significant improvements in cervical mobility and endurance in the three movement planes.


2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (05) ◽  
pp. 290-298
Author(s):  
Jerrold Petrofsky ◽  
Michael Laymon ◽  
Haneul Lee

AbstractBoth transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and superficial heat have been used for pain management. While heat has been shown to have a beneficial effect on pain, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation remains controversial. The purpose of the present study was to see if heat, when added to transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, would provide more consistent relief. A total of 180 subjects participated in this study and were randomly divided into 12 groups. Low level continuous heat was applied while electrical stimulation was applied at 2 intensities, 2 frequencies and with 2 waveforms for 4 h. Outcome measures were subjective pain scale, range of motion of the back and skin blood flow of the back. The control groups had no significant difference in pain, range of motion or skin blood flow comparing the data at the beginning and 4 h after (p> 0.05). There was a small reduction in pain with transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation alone while all other groups had a significant improvement in range of motion free of pain, reduction in pain, and increase in skin blood flow from the beginning to the end of the 4-hour period. Since transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation with low level continuous heat showed better outcomes then transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation alone or low level continuous heat alone, combining the 2 interventions seems to offer better outcomes for pain management for health care professionals.


2004 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 236-240 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heather (Hunter) Hettrick ◽  
Kimberly OʼBrien ◽  
Hope Laznick ◽  
Juan Sanchez ◽  
Delia Gorga ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 39-46 ◽  
Author(s):  
María Lidia Juárez-Albuixech ◽  
Olga Redondo-González ◽  
Inmaculada Tello ◽  
Susana Collado-Vázquez ◽  
Carmen Jiménez-Antona

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document