scholarly journals Crying patients in General/Family Practice: incidence, reasons for encounter and health problems

2012 ◽  
Vol 7 (24) ◽  
pp. 171-176 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juan Gérvas ◽  
Raimundo Pastor-Sánchez ◽  
Mercedes Pérez-Fernández

Context: Despite evidence demonstrating the benefits of understanding patients, there is a paucity of information about how physicians address psychological and social concerns of patients. No one study has been published about the incidence of crying in General/Family Practice. Objective: To know the incidence of crying in primary care/general practice, and the patients’ characteristics, their reasons for encounter and their health problems. Design: A descriptive, prospective study, of one year, of three general practitioners/family physicians in Madrid, Spain. Setting: primary care (doctors’ office and patients’ home). Subjects: Face to face encounters with crying patients. Main outcome measure: At least one rolling tear. Results: Patients cried in 157 encounters out of a total of 18,627 giving an incidence rate of 8.4 per thousand. More frequent reasons for encounters were: feeling depressed (12.7%), social handicap (mainly social isolation/living alone) (6.4%), relationship problem with partner (5.1%) and feeling anxious (3.2%). More frequent health problems were: depressive disorder (23.6%), anxiety disorder (8.3%), cerebrovascular disease (5.1%) and loss/death of partner (3.8%). Conclusions: Crying in primary care is not uncommon. Reasons for crying cover the whole range of human problems, mainly social and psychological problems.

2012 ◽  
Vol 7 (24) ◽  
pp. 137-138
Author(s):  
Armando Henrique Norman

A edição nº24 da Revista Brasileira de Medicina de Família e Comunidade (RBMFC) traz importantes temas a nossa reflexão, tanto para a Estratégia Saúde da Família (ESF) - quanto à sua efetividade e abrangência - como para a especialidade em Medicina de Família e Comunidade (MFC), visto que apresenta temas que nos distinguem de outras áreas da biomedicina. A primeira temática poderia ser definida enquanto o potencial da ESF para a produção de saúde no Brasil. Um exemplo é o artigo Desempenho de indicadores nos municípios com alta cobertura da Estratégia Saúde da Família no Estado de São Paulo que destaca como alguns municípios desse Estado apresentam melhores resultados com relação aos indicadores pactuados, quando comparados com municípios que não expandiram a cobertura da ESF. A segunda temática resgata aspectos centrais da especialidade em MFC. Apesar da morte e sofrimento serem comuns a todas as especialidades médicas, na MFC, em particular, ela é problematizada na relação médico-paciente e nos programas de formação, como, por exemplo, na ferramenta Ciclo de vida1. Nesta ferramenta, a morte se destaca como uma das crises normativas que marcam a existência, visto que nela se encerra o drama do sofrimento e da condição humana2. Assim, o artigo Crying Patients in General/Family Practice: incidence, reasons for encounter and health problems resgata o potencial do MFC para ressignificar o sofrimento humano através do cuidado personalizado e longitudinal dos pacientes. Quais os significados das lágrimas? Estamos preparados para um aprofundamento nesta dimensão do cuidado? Esses matizes da profissão do MFC também se descortinam no caso clínico intitulado Ser Médico de (sua) Família. Nele, o autor explora os limites da ética e da relação profissional-familiar ao contextualizar a tomada de decisão frente ao processo de cuidado, adoecimento e morte de um membro da família.Entretanto, a morte ainda segue sendo um tabu, um tema para não se discutir e tampouco um fenômeno a ser reconhecido. Isso é particularmente verdadeiro, visto que são poucos os médicos e enfermeiros que se sentem confortáveis para lidar com esse tema2. É reconhecido que os processos de morte são momentos dos mais tocantes para os seres humanos, pois remetem a nossa própria finitude. Por exemplo, Yalom3 caracteriza a morte como sendo uma ‘experiência limite’ (boundary experience), isto é, um evento que nos impulsiona a nos confrontarmos com nossa própria situação existencial no mundo. Para o autor, o reconhecimento da finitude está na raiz das ansiedades e, por isso, o ser humano constrói mecanismos de defesa para negá-la, mecanismos que essencialmente moldam nossas estruturas psíquicas3. Tanto é assim, que a morte tem sido cada vez mais ‘medicalizada’ nas sociedades ocidentais industrializadas, refletindo uma dificuldade coletiva do nosso tempo em lidar com esse tema e, por isso, o próprio conceito de ‘morte natural’ está desaparecendo4. Portanto, situações de doença e morte, entre outras crises normativas, podem abalar essas estruturas psíquicas, despertando sinais e sintomas que podem ou não ser patologizados, dependendo da abordagem que se oferece a essas expressões do ser.Contudo, é importante ressaltar que vida e morte são interdependentes, ou seja, existem simultaneamente e não deveriam ser percebidas como um fenômeno linear e consecutivo. Ao contrário, a morte deveria ser vivenciada como um evento cotidiano, firmado no agora e não como um fenômeno projetado no futuro3. Neste contexto de simultaneidade, a morte também celebra a vida. Por isso, a presente edição também homenageia a vida de Ian McWhinney, falecido em 28 de setembro de 2012, aos 85 anos de idade. Sem dúvida, McWhinney contribuiu enormemente para o fortalecimento da Medicina de Família muito além das fronteiras canadenses.  McWhinney afirmava que os MFC são diferentes por que não estão atrelados a órgão (ou sistema corpóreo) ou a tecnologias, pois o MFC se define mais em termos de relação médico-paciente5.  Ele advogava que a prática do MFC deveria ser reflexiva, apoiada num pensamento que denominou de ‘organísmico’ para transpor dualidades tradicionais entre mente-corpo, saúde-doença e causa-efeito5. Assim, McWhinney organizou e sistematizou um corpo de conhecimento que define a especialidade do Médico de Família.  O obituário escrito pelo Dr. Gustavo Gusso ressalta os principais feitos desse grande homem e profissional que trabalhou como médico de família até o final de sua vida, nos deixando um vasto legado teórico, ainda a ser explorado.Assim, esta edição brinda o leitor com uma gama de temas com os quais esperamos poder contribuir para a prática dos profissionais da APS, quer por ampliar sua reflexão sobre o processo de trabalho, quer por estimulá-los a pesquisar temas relevantes para a APS/ESF e, em especial, para os médicos de família e comunidade.


2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jørgen Lous ◽  
Grete Moth ◽  
Linda Huibers ◽  
Peter Vedsted ◽  
Morten Bondo Christensen

Author(s):  
Adi Heru Sutomo ◽  
Fitriana Fitriana

The increasing needs and health problems that exist in the community and the more critical the community-related health problems that require the ability of a primary care doctor able to handle existing health problems in the community. Primary care doctor complies with Alma Ata Declaration in 1978 as the backbone of health that makes direct contact with the community, so it is essential for a primary care doctor to involve the patient or the patient as part of the team. Patient experience information or patients given to primary care doctors is expected to further improve the quality of patient health services as individuals and is part of the family and society or community....................


2015 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-40 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard M. Frankel ◽  
Wendy Levinson

In its monograph Crossing the Quality Chasm, the Institute of Medicine asserted that 44,000 to 98,000 lives are lost every year due to avoidable medical errors, more than 80% of which involved breakdowns in communication. Medical malpractice claims also involve errors that cause harm, including death. Reasons for malpractice claims have been investigated using variables such as age, race, country of origin, and gender, none of which are predictive. One promising area that has not systematically been studied is the role of face-to-face communication in malpractice claims. To better understand this phenomenon, we tape-recorded 125 doctors (divided equally between surgeons and primary care practitioners), each with 10 consecutive patients. Half of these doctors had been sued at least twice, while the rest had never been sued. We then did a qualitative analysis based on a single taped encounter per doctor using conversation analysis (CA), in order to try to identify which doctors had claims or no-claims histories. While we were able to identify two out of every three no-claims primary care doctors, we were much less successful in identifying those with claims. Surprisingly, in the surgeon group, predictions based on CA were worse than by chance probability. We discuss the implications of our findings for the field of outcome-based communication analysis.


2011 ◽  
Vol 2011 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marek K. Dobke ◽  
Dhaval Bhavsar ◽  
Fernando Herrera

The purpose of our study was to determine the factors that influence the use of telemedicine consultation by primary care physicians (PCPs) in the management of patients with problem wounds. A short questionnaire was administered to thirty-six PCPs who referred to our Wound Care Program within one year. Participants were asked to rate the importance of specific concerns and benefits regarding the role of wound care surgical specialist (WCSS) and the use of telemedicine consults prior to possible face-to-face consultation. Sixty percent of respondents felt comfortable with telemedicine consultation based on recommendations alone. The total number of patients referred for telemedicine consult was 230, and face-to-face consultation with a WCSS was offered and arranged for 30% of patients. The perception of shared decision making, streamlining patient care, and an opportunity for followup were all highly ranked benefits. The majority of PCPs (93%) agreed that telemedicine wound care consult is a useful tool in their practice and would continue to use the telemedicine consult service.


Author(s):  
Masliyana Husin ◽  
Norazida Ab Rahman ◽  
Xin Ci Wong ◽  
Kamaliah Mohamad Noh ◽  
Seng Fah Tong ◽  
...  

Abstract Aim: The purpose of this paper is to describe the recruitment strategies, the response rates and the reasons for non-response of Malaysian public and private primary care doctors in an international survey on the quality, cost and equity in primary care. Background: Low research participation by primary care doctors, especially those working in the private sector, is a challenge to quality benchmarking. Methods: Primary care doctors were sampled through multi-stage sampling. The first stage-sampling unit was the primary care clinics, which were randomly sampled from five states in Malaysia to reflect their proportions in two strata – sector (public/private) and location (urban/rural). Strategies through endorsement, personalised invitation, face-to-face interview and non-monetary incentives were used to recruit public and private doctors. Data collection was carried out by fieldworkers through structured questionnaires. Findings: A total of 221 public and 239 private doctors participated in the study. Among the public doctors, 99.5% response rates were obtained. Among the private doctors, a 32.8% response rate was obtained. Totally, 30% of private clinics were uncontactable by telephone, and when these were excluded, the overall response rate is 46.8%. The response rate of the private clinics across the states ranges from 31.5% to 34.0%. A total of 167 answered the non-respondent questionnaire. Among the non-respondents, 77.4 % were male and 22.6% female (P = 0.011). There were 33.6% of doctors older than 65 years (P = 0.003) and 15.9% were from the state of Sarawak (P = 0.016) when compared to non-respondents. Reason for non-participation included being too busy (51.8%), not interested (32.9%), not having enough patients (9.1%) and did not find it beneficial (7.9%). Our study demonstrated the feasibility of obtaining favourable response rate in a survey involving doctors from public and private primary care settings


2011 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 5
Author(s):  
O A Abiodun ◽  
M F Tunde-Ayinmode ◽  
B A Ayinmode ◽  
O A Adegunloye

<p>Back-ground Primary care physicians (PCP) are accessible health care provider for most patients and are gatekeepers to specialist care. The extent to which they can identify children with mental health problems need to be explored.</p><p><strong>Objective:</strong> To explore the extent to which primary care physicians can identify children with mental health problems. Study setting The study was carried out at the Paediatric Clinic of the department of Family Medicine, University of Ilorin teaching Hospital, Ilorin, Nigeria.</p><p><strong>Method:</strong> A 2 staged study in which 350 children aged 7-14 years were screened with child behaviour questionnaire (Rutter Scale A2). A stratified sub-sample of 157 (all high scorers and about 30% of low scorers) were further interviewed with children version of Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia (K-SADS) by the psychiatrists. They were also evaluated by primary care physicians for the presence of mental health problems.</p><p><strong>Results:</strong> Out of the 157 children interviewed in the second stage, primary care doctors identified 12 children as having mental health problems. K-SADS identified 40 as cases, this includes 8 of the 12 identified by primary care doctors; that is, they identified 8 cases. They were poor in discriminating between cases and non- cases (P=0.012). Poor school attendance (P=0.001), frequent hospital visit (P=0.009) and long standing illness (P=0.039) were associated with case-ness. <strong></strong></p><p><strong>Conclusion:</strong> This study suggests that primary care physicians had difficulties in identifying mental health problems in the children. Interventions such as guideline protocols, primary care physician education and educational programmes to increase mental health literacy, may be effective in improving detection by primary care physicians.</p>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document