Determining Maximum Allowable Rubber Stopper Displacement for Container Closure Integrity (CCI)

2020 ◽  
Vol 74 (6) ◽  
pp. 688-692
Author(s):  
Lara Nonis ◽  
Martin Vogt ◽  
Susanne Joerg ◽  
Hanns-Christian Mahler ◽  
Franziska Riesen ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashwin C. Parenky ◽  
Saurabh Wadhwa ◽  
Hunter H. Chen ◽  
Amardeep S. Bhalla ◽  
Kenneth S. Graham ◽  
...  

AbstractIntravitreal (IVT) administration of therapeutics is the standard of care for treatment of back-of-eye disorders. Although a common procedure performed by retinal specialists, IVT administration is associated with unique challenges related to drug product, device and the procedure, which may result in adverse events. Container closure configuration plays a crucial role in maintaining product stability, safety, and efficacy for the intended shelf-life. Careful design of primary container configuration is also important to accurately deliver small volumes (10-100 μL). Over- or under-dosing may lead to undesired adverse events or lack of efficacy resulting in unpredictable and variable clinical responses. IVT drug products have been traditionally presented in glass vials. However, pre-filled syringes offer a more convenient administration option by reducing the number of steps required for dose preparation there by potentially reducing the time demand on the healthcare providers. In addition to primary container selection, product development studies should focus on, among other things, primary container component characterization, material compatibility with the formulation, formulation stability, fill volume determination, extractables/leachables, and terminal sterilization. Ancillary components such as disposable syringes and needles must be carefully selected, and a detailed administration procedure that includes dosing instructions is required to ensure successful administration of the product. Despite significant efforts in improving the drug product and administration procedures, ocular safety concerns such as endophthalmitis, increased intraocular pressure, and presence of silicone floaters have been reported. A systematic review of available literature on container closure and devices for IVT administration can help guide successful product development.


Author(s):  
Roman Mathaes ◽  
Hanns-Christian Mahler ◽  
Jean-Pierre Buettiker ◽  
Holger Roehl ◽  
Philippe Lam ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 32 (11-12) ◽  
pp. 1768-1827 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel L. Norwood ◽  
Dennis Jenke ◽  
Cristina Manolescu ◽  
Scott Pennino ◽  
Nelu Grinberg

2021 ◽  
pp. pdajpst.2021.012633
Author(s):  
Roman Mathaes ◽  
Klaus Wuchner ◽  
David Riesop ◽  
Daniel Wagner ◽  
Sascha Dreher ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. pdajpst.2020.012622
Author(s):  
Dan Coleman ◽  
Tony Pourmohamad ◽  
Yenny Webb Vargas ◽  
Maury Mossman
Keyword(s):  

1994 ◽  
Vol 3 (6) ◽  
pp. 448-451 ◽  
Author(s):  
T Buckley ◽  
SM Dudley ◽  
LG Donowitz

BACKGROUND. Recommendations in the literature conflict on the necessity of disinfecting single-use vials prior to aspiration of fluid. Interventions to disinfect the stopper surface on multiple-dose vials vary considerably. OBJECTIVES. To determine the necessity of alcohol disinfection of the stopper on single-dose vials and to compare povidone-iodine and alcohol versus alcohol-only disinfection of the stopper prior to each needle penetration on multiple-dose vials. METHODS. The rubber stopper surfaces of 100 single-dose vials were cultured for the presence of bacteria. To determine the efficacy of two procedures for disinfection of multiple-dose vials, 87 stopper surfaces routinely disinfected with both povidone-iodine and alcohol were cultured for bacteria. After a change in practice, 100 multiple-dose vials routinely disinfected with alcohol only were cultured for the presence of bacteria. RESULTS. Of the cultures done on single-dose vial stoppers, 99% were sterile. A comparison of the two disinfection techniques for multiple-dose vials revealed that 83 (95%) of the 87 vials prepped with both povidone-iodine and alcohol were sterile, compared with all stoppers disinfected with alcohol only. CONCLUSIONS. This study shows the lack of necessity of any disinfection procedure on the rubber stopper of single-dose vials and the efficacy of alcohol only for disinfecting the stopper of multiple-dose vials.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document