scholarly journals Comparison of Some ELISA Kits for Aflatoxin M1 Quantification

2019 ◽  
Vol 102 (2) ◽  
pp. 677-679 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nida Imtiaz ◽  
Agha Waqar Yunus
Keyword(s):  
Standard Deviation ◽  
Relative Standard Deviation ◽  
Dairy Products ◽  
High Sensitivity ◽  
Aflatoxin M1 ◽  
Comparable Efficacy ◽  
Assigned Value ◽  
Elisa Kit ◽  
Whole Milk ◽  
Relative Standard

Abstract Background: ELISA is a widely used method for aflatoxin M1 (AFM1) quantification in dairy products. This study was conducted to compare ELISA kits from different manufacturers for AFM1 quantification inmilk. Methods: High sensitivity ELISA kits (for up to 250 ng AFM1/L), including AgraQuant (Romer Labs), Bioshield M1ES (Prognosis Biotech), Helica 96 (Helica Biosystems), Veratox (Neogen, Inc.), and the medium sensitivity kit Immunolab AM1E01 (Immunolab GmbH; for 10–1000ng AFM1/L) were tested against a certified reference AFM1 whole milk having 44 ng AFM1/L and its 10-fold dilution, and a50 ng AFM1/L standard. In another experiment, Prognosis Bioshield M1UF (70–1000 ng AFM1/L), Romer’s AgraquantPlus (10–2000 ng AFM1/L), and Immunulab’s AM1E01 kits were compared totest a 500 ng AFM1/L solution. Results: In both of the experiments, the quantification ofthe tested AFM1 levels did not differ (P ≥ 0.310) between the kitsfrom various manufacturers. In the case of 4.4 ng AFM1/L, recovery of the toxin wasclose to the assigned value under the kit by Neogen, Inc. Incase the of 44 ng level, better recoveries were seen under the kits by Immunolab and Prognosis Biotech. In both the cases, low relative standard deviation (RSD) values were obtained only for the kit by Prognosis Biotech. In the case of the 50 and 500 ng AFM1/L solutions, the kits by Prognosis Biotech and Romer Labs provided recoveries close tothe assigned values as well as low RSD. Conclusions: These data indicate that all thestudied ELISA kit brands had comparable efficacy forAFM1 quantification. Recovery of the toxin and RSD may, however, differ between kits fromvarious manufacturers.

Collaborative Evaluation of a Fluorometric Method for Measuring Alkaline Phosphatase Activity in Cow's, Sheep's, and Goat's Milk

2005 ◽  
Vol 68 (5) ◽  
pp. 1047-1053 ◽  
Author(s):  
FRANK HARDING ◽  
EILEEN GARRY
Keyword(s):  
Alkaline Phosphatase ◽  
Standard Deviation ◽  
Relative Standard Deviation ◽  
Dairy Products ◽  
Test System ◽  
Plant Performance ◽  
Alp Activity ◽  
Goat’S Milk ◽  
Relative Standard ◽  
Goat's Milk

Pasteurization of raw milk was introduced to extend product shelf life and destroy pathogens. The measurement of alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity has been used as an indicator of proper pasteurization in dairy products for more than 65 years. This study was undertaken to evaluate six different fluid dairy products at lower phosphatase levels than previously verified using the Fluorophos Test System, a sensitive and precise method for ALP activity detection. Thirteen laboratories participated in this collaborative, international study to evaluate the fluorometric test at 20, 40, 100, 350, and 500 mU/liter and extend the scope of the method to include milk from not only cows but also goats and sheep. Initially, the statutory level of ALP measured fluorometrically was set to equivalent levels of colorimetric test standards (500 mU/liter). The European Union recently announced its intention of lowering the legal limit from 500 to 350 mU/liter and, in addition, setting a target value of 100 mU/liter, which if exceeded would trigger an investigation into the pasteurizer plant performance. At 500 mU/liter of ALP, this trial generated relative standard deviation of repeatability values of 6.48, 5.69, and 1.74% and relative standard deviation of reproducibility values of 14.66, 13.30, and 5.33% for all cow's, sheep's, and goat's milk samples, respectively. Data from this study are comparable to data from previous studies and indicate the suitability of the Fluorophos Test System method for measuring ALP activity in milk from cows, sheep, and goats not only at the current European statutory level of 500 mU/liter but also at much lower levels.

scholarly journals Immunoaffinity Column Cleanup with Liquid Chromatography for Determination of Aflatoxin M1 in Liquid Milk: Collaborative Study

2001 ◽  
Vol 84 (2) ◽  
pp. 437-443 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sylviane Dragacci ◽  
Frederic Grosso ◽  
John Gilbert ◽  
M Agnedal ◽  
L Hyndrick ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Liquid Chromatography ◽  
Standard Deviation ◽  
Relative Standard Deviation ◽  
Collaborative Study ◽  
Aflatoxin M1 ◽  
Immunoaffinity Column ◽  
Precision Data ◽  
Relative Standard ◽  
Liquid Milk

Abstract A collaborative study was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of an immunoaffinity column cleanup liquid chromatographic method for determination of aflatoxin M1 in milk at proposed European regulatory limits. The test portion of liquid milk was centrifuged, filtered, and applied to an immunoaffinity column. The column was washed with water, and aflatoxin was eluted with pure acetonitrile. Aflatoxin M1 was separated by reversed-phase liquid chromatography (LC) with fluorescence detection. Frozen liquid milk samples both naturally contaminated with aflatoxin M1 and blank samples for spiking, were sent to 12 collaborators in 12 different European countries. Test portions of samples were spiked at 0.05 ng aflatoxin M1 per mL. After removal of 2 noncompliant sets of results, the mean recovery of aflatoxin M1 was 74%. Based on results for spiked samples (blind pairs at 1 level) and naturally contaminated samples (blind pairs at 3 levels) the relative standard deviation for repeatability (RSDr) ranged from 8 to 18%. The relative standard deviation for reproducibility (RSDR) ranged from 21 to 31%. The method showed acceptable within- and between-laboratory precision data for liquid milk, as evidenced by HORRAT values at the low level of aflatoxin M1 contamination.

An Automated Procedure for the Determination of Ammonia in Tobacco

1972 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
P.F. Collins ◽  
W.W. Lawrence ◽  
J.F. Williams
Keyword(s):  
Standard Deviation ◽  
Relative Standard Deviation ◽  
Distillation Method ◽  
Relative Standard ◽  
Tobacco Sample ◽  
Automated Determination

AbstractA procedure for the automated determination of ammonia in tobacco has been developed. Ammonia is extracted from the ground tobacco sample with water and is determined with a Technicon Auto Analyser system which employs separation of the ammonia through volatilization followed by colourimetry using the phenate-hypochlorite reaction. The procedure has been applied to a variety of tobaccos containing from 0.02 to 0.5 % ammonia with an overall relative standard deviation of 2 %. The accuracy of the procedure as judged by recovery tests and by comparison to a manual distillation method is considered adequate

How Certain Are the Reported Ionic Conductivities of Thiophosphate-Based Solid Electrolytes? an Interlaboratory Study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saneyuki Ohno ◽  
Tim Bernges ◽  
Johannes Buchheim ◽  
Marc Duchardt ◽  
Anna-Katharina Hatz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Standard Deviation ◽  
Ionic Conductivity ◽  
Relative Standard Deviation ◽  
Solid Electrolytes ◽  
Ionic Conductivities ◽  
Ionic Conductors ◽  
Energy Storage Devices ◽  
Activation Barriers ◽  
Storage Devices ◽  
Relative Standard

<p>Owing to highly conductive solid ionic conductors, all-solid-state batteries attract significant attention as promising next-generation energy storage devices. A lot of research is invested in the search and optimization of solid electrolytes with higher ionic conductivity. However, a systematic study of an <i>interlaboratory reproducibility</i> of measured ionic conductivities and activation energies is missing, making the comparison of absolute values in literature challenging. In this study, we perform an uncertainty evaluation via a Round Robin approach using different Li-argyrodites exhibiting orders of magnitude different ionic conductivities as reference materials. Identical samples are distributed to different research laboratories and the conductivities and activation barriers are measured by impedance spectroscopy. The results show large ranges of up to 4.5 mScm<sup>-1</sup> in the measured total ionic conductivity (1.3 – 5.8 mScm<sup>-1</sup> for the highest conducting sample, relative standard deviation 35 – 50% across all samples) and up to 128 meV for the activation barriers (198 – 326 meV, relative standard deviation 5 – 15%, across all samples), presenting the necessity of a more rigorous methodology including further collaborations within the community and multiplicate measurements.</p>

scholarly journals Indirect and Direct Determination of the Casein Content of Milk by Kjeldahl Nitrogen Analysis: Collaborative Study

1998 ◽  
Vol 81 (4) ◽  
pp. 763-774 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joanna M Lynch ◽  
David M Barbano ◽  
J Richard Fleming
Keyword(s):  
Standard Deviation ◽  
Nitrogen Content ◽  
Relative Standard Deviation ◽  
Collaborative Study ◽  
Direct Determination ◽  
Raw Milk ◽  
Method Performance ◽  
Relative Standard ◽  
Milk Casein

Abstract The classic method for determination of milk casein is based on precipitation of casein at pH 4.6. Precipitated milk casein is removed by filtration and the nitrogen content of either the precipitate (direct casein method) or filtrate (noncasein nitrogen; NCN) is determined by Kjeldahl analysis. For the indirect casein method, milk total nitrogen (TN; Method 991.20) is also determined and casein is calculated as TN minus NCN. Ten laboratories tested 9 pairs of blind duplicate raw milk materials with a casein range of 2.42- 3.05℅ by both the direct and indirect casein methods. Statistical performance expressed in protein equivalents (nitrogen ⨯ 6.38) with invalid and outlier data removed was as follows: NCN method (wt%), mean = 0.762, sr = 0.010, SR = 0.016, repeatability relative standard deviation (RSDr) = 1.287℅, reproducibility relative standard deviation (RSDR) = 2.146%; indirect casein method (wt℅), mean = 2.585, repeatability = 0.015, reproducibility = 0.022, RSDr = 0.560℅, RSDR = 0.841; direct casein method (wt℅), mean = 2.575, sr = 0.015, sR = 0.025, RSDr = 0.597℅, RSDR = 0.988℅. Method performance was acceptable and comparable to similar Kjeldahl methods for determining nitrogen content of milk (Methods 991.20, 991.21,991.22, 991.23). The direct casein, indirect casein, and noncasein nitrogen methods have been adopted by AOAC INTERNATIONAL.

scholarly journals A computer-controlled potentiometric/spectrophotometric titrator

1988 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 95-100
Author(s):  
John D. Stong
Keyword(s):  
Standard Deviation ◽  
Relative Standard Deviation ◽  
Bromophenol Blue ◽  
System Control ◽  
Data Format ◽  
Relative Standard ◽  
Spectrophotometric Titrations ◽  
Computer Controlled ◽  
Major Attention ◽  
Diode Array Spectrophotometer

A laboratory computer controlled potentiometric titrator interfaced to a diode array spectrophotometer is described. The titrator consists of widely used, commercially available components; therefore, major attention is given to modes of interconnection and software implementation in data format and system control. Replicate potentiometric titrations of glycines gave a relative standard deviation in titre of 1.035% and a relative standard deviation in pH of 0.745%. Replicate spectrophotometric titrations of bromophenol blue were analysed at three wavelengths to yield pKa= 3.898 ± 0.075 (1.9% rsd).Methods of data presentation and manipulation are presented.

Determination of Nitrate in Water by HPLC

2013 ◽  
Vol 448-453 ◽  
pp. 406-408
Author(s):  
Jing Liu ◽  
Xiao Na Ji ◽  
Qing Kai Ren ◽  
Sheng Shu Ai ◽  
Li Jun Wan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Performance Liquid Chromatography ◽  
Liquid Chromatography ◽  
Standard Deviation ◽  
Relative Standard Deviation ◽  
Recovery Rate ◽  
High Performance ◽  
Separation Efficiency ◽  
Fast Analysis ◽  
Relative Standard

We established a method fordetermination of nitrate in water by High Performance Liquid Chromatography(HPLC). The sample was analysed by HPLC-ADA and was quantitated by externalstandard method after being simply processed. This methd has the advantages ofhigh separation efficiency and fast analysis. The experiment result showed thatthe linearly dependent coefficient was0.994, the recovery rate was between 98.7%～105.7%,the relative standard deviation（RSD）wasless than 2.1 %, and the lowest detectable limit is 0.01ng (S/N=1.6).

scholarly journals Determination of 1,3-Dichloropropanol in Soy Sauce and Related Products by Headspace Gas Chromatography with Mass Spectrometric Detection: Interlaboratory Study

2005 ◽  
Vol 88 (5) ◽  
pp. 1404-1412 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah Hasnip ◽  
Colin Crews ◽  
Nicholas Potter ◽  
Paul Brereton ◽  
Henri Diserens ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gas Chromatography ◽  
Standard Deviation ◽  
Relative Standard Deviation ◽  
Internal Standard ◽  
Mass Spectrometric ◽  
Soy Sauce ◽  
Headspace Gas Chromatography ◽  
Relative Standard ◽  
Headspace Gas

Abstract An interlaboratory study was performed to evaluate the effectiveness of a headspace gas chromatography (GC) method for the determination of 1,3-dichloro-propan-2-ol (1,3-DCP) in soy sauce and related products at levels above 5 ng/g. The test portion is mixed with an internal standard (d5-1,3-DCP) and ammonium sulfate in a sealed headspace vial. After achieving equilibrium, the headspace is sampled either by gas-tight syringe or solid-phase microextraction (SPME) and analyzed by GC with mass spectrometric detection. 1,3-DCP is detected in the selected-ion mode (monitoring m/z 79 and 81 for 1,3-DCP and m/z 82 for the deuterated internal standard) and quantified by measurement against standards. Test materials comprising soy, dark soy, mushroom soy, and teriyaki sauces, both spiked and naturally contaminated, were sent to 9 laboratories in Europe, Japan, and the United States; of these, 5 used SPME and 4 used syringe headspace analysis. Test portions were spiked at 5.0, 10.0, 20.0, 100.0, and 500.0 ng/g. The average recovery for spiked blank samples was 108% (ranging from 96–130%). Based on results for spiked samples (blind pairs at 5, 10, 20, 100, and 500 ng/g) as well as a naturally contaminated sample (split-level pair at 27 and 29 ng/g), the relative standard deviation for repeatability (RSDr) ranged from 2.9–23.2%. The relative standard deviation for reproducibility (RSDR) ranged from 20.9–35.3%, and HorRat values of between 1.0 and 1.6 were obtained.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document