scholarly journals Pemphigus Vulgaris and Bullous Pemphigoid: Update on Diagnosis and Treatment

2020 ◽  
pp. e2020050 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vito Di Lernia ◽  
Dahiana M. Casanova ◽  
Mohamad Goldust ◽  
Cinzia Ricci

Autoimmune bullous disorders are a heterogeneous spectrum of skin disorders characterized by the production of autoantibodies against adhesion molecules of the skin. The 2 major groups of diseases are “pemphigus diseases” and “autoimmune bullous diseases of the pemphigoid type.” Pemphigus diseases are a group of autoimmune blistering diseases of the skin and mucous membranes characterized by intraepithelial cleft and acantholysis. The main subtypes of pemphigus include pemphigus vulgaris, pemphigus foliaceus, and paraneoplastic pemphigus. Diagnosis is based on clinical manifestations and confirmed with histological, immunofluorescence, and serological testing. Recently multivariant enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay systems have been developed as practical screening tools for patients with suspected autoimmune bullous dermatoses. The current first-line treatment of pemphigus is based on systemic corticosteroids that are often combined with immunosuppressive adjuvants, such as azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil, and the anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody rituximab, usually at initiation of treatment. Rituximab efficacy is higher when it is administered early in the course of the disease. Therefore, it should be used as first-line treatment to improve efficacy and reduce cumulative doses of corticosteroids and their side effects. Treatment of bullous pemphigoid is based on disease extension. Localized and mild forms can be treated with superpotent topical corticosteroids or with nonimmunosuppressive agents. In patients with generalized disease or whose disease is resistant to the treatments described above, systemic corticosteroids are preferred and effective. Adjuvant immunosuppressants are often combined with steroids for their steroid-sparing effect.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 670-670 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshiyuki Yamamoto ◽  
Wataru Okamoto ◽  
Akitaka Makiyama ◽  
Kohei Shitara ◽  
Tadamichi Denda ◽  
...  

670 Background: Bevacizumab (BV)-containing chemotherapy has been established as the standard first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, no biomarkers have been established to predict the clinical benefit of BV for patients (pts) with mCRC. Methods: Blood samples were collected in EDTA before the first-line treatment with BV+mFOLFOX6 or +XELOX for mCRC. Plasma samples were analyzed at Roche Diagnostics Ltd. (Penzberg, Germany) using IMPACT-2 (Roche proprietary multiplex enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay platform). Median values of pICAM-1 and pIL-8 were used as cut-off points to categorize pts into the low and high groups. Progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared between two groups, using Cox proportional hazards model. Results: Among 102 pts enrolled between January 2014 and April 2015, 100 (53 BV+mFOLFOX6 and 47 BV+XELOX) were eligible. Median PFS was 11.4 months [95% CI, 9.5-13.0]. Response rate was 64.6 % [53.3-74.9]. pICAM-1 and pIL-8 were measured in 99 pts and the median values were 190.0 ng/ml [range, 58.0- 1080.1] and 311.5 pg/ml [range, 83.2-4541.4], respectively. The hazard ratios of PFS and OS between the high and low pICAM-1 groups were 2.08 [95%CI, 1.28-3.40, p = 0.003] and 2.04 [0.92-4.50, p = 0.079], respectively. The hazard ratios of PFS and OS between the high and low pIL-8 groups were 1.63 [95%CI, 1.00-2.65, p = 0.048] and 3.42[1.57-7.44, p = 0.002], respectively. Conclusions: High pICAM-1 and pIL-8 were associated with short PFS and OS of mCRC pts treated with BV-containing chemotherapy, suggesting that pICAM-1 and pIL-8 could be predictive markers for prognosis of mCRC treated with BV. Clinical trial information: UMIN000012442.


The Lancet ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 389 (10079) ◽  
pp. 1586-1588 ◽  
Author(s):  
Henry J Grantham ◽  
Deborah D Stocken ◽  
Nick J Reynolds

ORL ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Mohammed Hassan Hussain ◽  
Faiz Tanweer ◽  
Georgios Sakagiannis ◽  
Manish Mair ◽  
Sara Mahmood ◽  
...  

<b><i>Background:</i></b> Autoimmune bullous diseases are rare conditions characterized by blistering of the skin and mucous membranes. The 2 commonest forms are pemphigus vulgaris and bullous pemphigoid. The oral cavity or oropharynx may be the initial site of presentation or often the only site involved. <b><i>Summary:</i></b> These conditions are often misdiagnosed or overlooked leading to poorer patient outcomes. Due to the chronic nature of these conditions and the systemic effects of treatment, there is a significant associated morbidity and mortality. As such, an understanding of the fundamentals of autoimmune bullous diseases is vital to those working in otolaryngology. The mainstay of management in both conditions is topical and systemic corticosteroids. There is also a role for immunomodulating and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs as adjunct or alternative therapies. Surgical intervention may be required to protect the airway. Often multimodality treatment is required involving multidisciplinary input from otolaryngologists, oral surgeons, dermatologists, and rheumatologists. This review article will highlight the aetiology, pathology, clinical features, investigations, and management of both pemphigus vulgaris and bullous pemphigoid including recent advances in management.


2020 ◽  
Vol 58 (10) ◽  
pp. 1623-1633
Author(s):  
Otto Van de gaer ◽  
Petra de Haes ◽  
Xavier Bossuyt

AbstractBackgroundBoth enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) and indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) are available for the diagnosis of autoimmune bullous diseases (AIBD). Many studies have reported on the performance of ELISAs and concluded that ELISAs could replace IIF. This study compares the diagnostic accuracy of ELISA and IIF for the detection of autoantibodies to desmoglein 1 (DSG1), desmoglein 3 (DSG3), bullous pemphigoid antigen 2 (BP180) and bullous pemphigoid antigen 1 (BP230) to support the diagnosis of pemphigus vulgaris (PV), pemphigus foliaceus (PF) and bullous pemphigoid (BP).MethodsA literature search was performed in the PubMed database. The meta-analysis was performed using summary values and a bivariate random effect model.ResultsThe five included studies on PV did not demonstrate significant differences between IIF and DSG3-ELISA (sensitivity 82.3% vs. 81.6%, p = 0.9284; specificity 95.6% vs. 93.9%, p = 0.5318; diagnostic odds ratio [DOR] 101.60 vs. 67.760, p = 0.6206). The three included studies on PF did not demonstrate significant differences between IIF and DSG1-ELISA (sensitivity 80.6% vs. 83.1%, p = 0.8501; specificity 97.5% vs. 93.9%, p = 0.3614; DOR 160.72 vs. 75.615, p = 0.5381). The eight included studies on BP showed that BP230-ELISA differed significantly from both IIF on monkey esophagus (MO) and BP180-ELISA with regard to DOR (11.384 vs. 68.349, p = 0.0008; 11.384 vs. 41.699, p = 0.0125, respectively)ConclusionsOur meta-analysis shows that ELISA performs as well as IIF for diagnosing PV, PF and BP.


2009 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 155-159 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aaron M. Drucker ◽  
Elena Pope ◽  
Sanjay Mahant ◽  
Miriam Weinstein

Background: Historically, patients with the consumptive coagulopathy Kasabach-Merritt syndrome (KMS) have been treated with systemic corticosteroids as first-line therapy, but many patients do not respond. Recently, there have been increasing reports of the use of the chemotherapeutic drug vincristine in these patients. Objective: To report a case of a newborn with a kaposiform hemangioendothelioma (KHE) of the right leg associated with KMS treated successfully with vincristine and oral corticosteroids. Methods: The patient's chart and the literature on the subject were reviewed using Medline and PubMed. Results: Treatment with vincristine and corticosteroids lead to sustained shrinking of the tumor and correction of the thrombocytopenia and coagulopathy through 1 year of age. We believe this is the first report in the North American literature of corticosteroids and vincristine being used concomitantly as first-line therapy for KHE with KMS. Conclusion: Vincristine and corticosteroids should be considered first-line treatment for KMS.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document