Limited Adenocarcinoma of the Prostate on Needle Core Biopsy

Context.— Grading small foci of prostate cancer on a needle biopsy is often difficult, yet the clinical significance of accurate grading remains uncertain. Objective.— To assess if grading of limited adenocarcinoma on prostate biopsy specimen is critical. Design.— We studied 295 consecutive patients undergoing extended-sextant biopsy with only 1-core involvement of adenocarcinoma, followed by radical prostatectomy. Results.— The linear tumor lengths on these biopsy specimens were: less than 1 mm (n = 114); 1 mm or more or less than 2 mm (n = 82); 2 mm or more or less than 3 mm (n = 35); and 3 mm or more (n = 64). Longer length was strongly associated with higher Grade Group (GG) on biopsy or prostatectomy specimen, higher risk of extraprostatic extension/seminal vesicle invasion and positive surgical margin, and larger estimated tumor volume. When cases were compared based on biopsy specimen GG, higher grade was strongly associated with higher prostatectomy specimen GG, higher incidence of pT3/pT3b disease, and larger tumor volume. Outcome analysis further showed significantly higher risks for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy in patients with 1 mm or more, 2 mm or more, 3 mm or more, GG2-4, GG3-4, GG4, less than 1 mm/GG2-4, less than 1 mm/GG3-4, less than 2 mm/GG3-4, 3 mm or more/GG2-4, or 3 mm or more/GG3-4 tumor on biopsy specimens, compared with respective control subgroups. In particular, 3 mm or more, GG3, and GG4 on biopsy specimens showed significance as independent prognosticators by multivariate analysis. Meanwhile, there were no significant differences in the rate of upgrading or downgrading after radical prostatectomy among those subgrouped by biopsy specimen tumor length (eg, <1 mm [44.7%] versus ≥1/<2 mm [41.5%] versus ≥2/<3 mm [45.7%] versus ≥3 mm [46.9%]). Conclusions.— These results indicate that pathologists still need to make maximum efforts to grade relatively small prostate cancer on biopsy specimens.

Download Full-text

The Clinical Impact of pT3a Lesions in Patients With pT3b Prostate Cancer Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy

Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine ◽

10.5858/arpa.2021-0069-oa ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Numbereye Numbere ◽

Yuki Teramoto ◽

Pratik M. S. Gurung ◽

Takuro Goto ◽

Zhiming Yang ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Prostate Cancer ◽

Radical Prostatectomy ◽

Bladder Neck ◽

Tumor Volume ◽

Specific Antigen ◽

Surgical Margin ◽

Clinical Impact ◽

Outcome Analysis ◽

Positive Surgical Margin ◽

Extraprostatic Extension

Context.— Seminal vesicle invasion (SVI) by prostate cancer (pT3b disease) has been considered as a key prognostic factor. Objective.— To assess the clinical impact of T3a lesions (ie, extraprostatic extension other than bladder neck invasion [BNI] or SVI [EPE], microscopic bladder neck invasion [mBNI]) in pT3b disease. Design.— We compared radical prostatectomy findings and long-term oncologic outcomes in 248 patients with pT3b disease, with versus without EPE/mBNI. Results.— Extraprostatic extension/mBNI was found in 219 (88.3%)/48 (19.4%) cases, respectively. Extraprostatic extension was significantly associated with higher preoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, higher rates of positive surgical margin (pSM) and lymphovascular invasion (LVI), and larger tumor volume. Similarly, mBNI was significantly associated with higher PSA level, higher rates of Grade Group(s) 4-5 or 5, pSM, LVI, and pN1, and larger tumor volume. Significant differences in all of these clinicopathologic features (except lymph node metastasis) between EPE−/mBNI+ or EPE+/mBNI− and EPE+/mBNI+ cases were also observed. Outcome analysis revealed that patients with EPE (P < .001) or mBNI (P < .001) had a significantly higher risk of disease progression than respective controls. Notably, there were significant differences in progression-free survival between EPE−/mBNI+ or EPE+/mBNI− cases and EPE−/mBNI− (P = .001) or EPE+/mBNI+ (P < .001) cases. In multivariate analysis, EPE (hazard ratio [HR] = 6.53, P = .009) and mBNI (HR = 2.33, P = .003), as well as EPE−/mBNI+ or EPE+/mBNI− (HR = 11.7, P = .01) and EPE+/mBNI+ (HR = 25.9, P = .002) (versus EPE−/mBNI−), showed significance for progression. Conclusions.— From these significant findings, we propose a novel pT3b subclassification: pT3b1 (SVI alone without EPE or mBNI), pT3b2 (SVI with either EPE or mBNI), and pT3b3 (SVI with both EPE and mBNI).

Download Full-text

The Clinical Impact of Unilateral Versus Bilateral Invasion Into the Seminal Vesicle in Patients With Prostate Cancer Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy

Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine ◽

10.5858/arpa.2021-0265-oa ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Numbereye Numbere ◽

Yuki Teramoto ◽

Pratik M. S. Gurung ◽

Ying Wang ◽

Zhiming Yang ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Prostate Cancer ◽

Radical Prostatectomy ◽

Seminal Vesicle ◽

Surgical Margin ◽

Tumor Grade ◽

Oncologic Outcomes ◽

Outcome Analysis ◽

Positive Surgical Margin ◽

Grade Group ◽

Histopathologic Features

Context.— Seminal vesicle involvement by prostate cancer has generally been considered as a key prognosticator. Objective.— To assess the clinical significance of unilateral (Uni) versus bilateral (Bil) seminal vesicle invasion (SVI). Design.— We compared radical prostatectomy findings and long-term oncologic outcomes in 248 patients showing Uni-SVI (n = 139) versus Bil-SVI (n = 109). Results.— Tumor grade was significantly higher in Bil-SVI cases than in Uni-SVI cases. Additionally, Bil-SVI was significantly associated with a higher incidence of lymphovascular invasion, lymph node metastasis, or positive surgical margin, and larger estimated tumor volume. When the histopathologic features at SVI foci were compared, Grade Group (GG) 3-5/4-5/5 and cribriform morphology were significantly more often seen in Bil-SVI. Outcome analysis revealed that patients with Bil-SVI had a significantly higher risk of disease progression (P < .001) than patients with Uni-SVI. Significantly worse progression-free survival in patients with Bil-SVI was also observed in all subgroups examined, including those with no immediate adjuvant therapy (IAT) (n = 139; P = .01), IAT (n = 109; P = .001), pN0 disease (n = 153; P = .002), or pN1 disease (n = 93; P = .006). In multivariate analysis, Bil-SVI (versus Uni-SVI) showed significance for progression in the entire (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.83, P = .01), IAT (HR = 2.90, P = .006), and pN0 (HR = 2.05, P = .01) cohorts. Meanwhile, tumor grade at SVI (eg, GG4, GG5), as an independent predictor, was significantly associated with patient outcomes. Conclusions.— Bil-SVI was found to be strongly associated with worse histopathologic features on radical prostatectomy and poorer prognosis. Pathologists may thus need to report Uni-SVI versus Bil-SVI, along with other histopathologic findings, such as Gleason score, at SVI in prostatectomy specimens.

Download Full-text

The Clinical Significance of Perineural Invasion by Prostate Cancer on Needle Core Biopsy

Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine ◽

10.5858/arpa.2021-0248-oa ◽

2022 ◽

Author(s):

Phoenix D. Bell ◽

Yuki Teramoto ◽

Pratik M. S. Gurung ◽

Numbereye Numbere ◽

Zhiming Yang ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Prostate Cancer ◽

Prostate Specific Antigen ◽

Perineural Invasion ◽

Tumor Volume ◽

Specific Antigen ◽

Surgical Margin ◽

Outcome Analysis ◽

Positive Surgical Margin ◽

Grade Group ◽

Entire Cohort

Context.— Perineural invasion (PNI) by prostate cancer has been associated with adverse pathology, including extraprostatic extension. However, the significance of PNI quantification on prostate biopsy (PBx) remains unclear. Objective.— To compare radical prostatectomy (RP) findings and long-term outcomes in patients whose PBx had exhibited PNI. Design.— We assessed 497 consecutive patients undergoing sextant (6-site/≥12-core) PBx showing conventional adenocarcinoma followed by RP. Results.— PNI was found in 1 (n = 290)/2 (n = 132)/3 (n = 47)/4 (n = 19)/5 (n = 5)/6 (n = 4) of the sites/regions of PBx. Compared with a single PNI site, multiple PNIs were significantly associated with higher preoperative prostate-specific antigen, higher Grade Group (GG) on PBx or RP, higher pT or pN category, positive surgical margin, and larger estimated tumor volume. When compared in subgroups of patients based on PBx GG, significant differences in RP GG (GG1–3), pT (GG1–2/GG1–3/GG2/GG3), surgical margin status (GG1–3/GG3/GG5), or tumor volume (GG1–2/GG1–3/GG2/GG3) between 1 versus multiple PNIs were observed. Moreover, there were significant differences in prostate-specific antigen (PNI sites: 1–2 versus 3–6/1–3 versus 4–6/1–4 versus 5–6), RP GG (1–3 versus 4–6/1–4 versus 5–6), pT (1–2 versus 3–6/1–3 versus 4–6), pN (1–3 versus 4–6), or tumor volume (1–2 versus 3–6/1–4 versus 5–6). Outcome analysis revealed significantly higher risks of disease progression in the entire cohort or PBx GG1–2/GG1–3/GG2/GG3/GG5 cases showing 2 to 6 PNIs, compared with respective controls with 1-site PNI. In multivariate analysis, multisite PNI was an independent predictor for progression (hazard ratio = 1.556, P = .03). Conclusions.— Multiple sites of PNI on PBx were associated with worse histopathologic features in RP specimens and poorer prognosis. PNI may thus need to be specified, if present, in every sextant site on PBx, especially those showing GG1–3 cancer.

Download Full-text

Evaluation of The Tumor Volume From Surgical Specimens After Radical Prostatectomy and Its Clinical Impact on The Prognosis of Patients With Localized Prostate Cancer

10.21203/rs.3.rs-130026/v1 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Hyeong Dong Yuk ◽

Seok-Soo Byun ◽

Sung Kyu Hong ◽

Hakmin Lee

Keyword(s):

Prostate Cancer ◽

Radical Prostatectomy ◽

Biochemical Recurrence ◽

Tumor Volume ◽

Risk Group ◽

Surgical Margin ◽

Localized Prostate Cancer ◽

Positive Surgical Margin ◽

Continuous Variables ◽

The Mean

Abstract We evaluated the contribution of tumor volume (TV) to localized prostate cancer (PCa) patients’ prognosis. We retrospectively analyzed the data of 2,394 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy (RP) for localized PCa. The effect of TV volume on prostate cancer patients' prognosis was analyzed through Kaplan-Meier and Cox-proportional analysis. The mean prostate volume for all patients was 36.5 ± 15.4 cc, and the mean TV was 5.9 ± 8.3 cc. A significant positive relationship was observed between the classification by risk group in D’ Amico risk classification and the National Comprehensive Cancer Network risk group. (P < 0.001). The high TV showed significantly worse pathologic outcomes than the low TV in terms of high rates of extra-capsular extension, seminal vesicle invasion, and positive surgical margin (P < 0.05). The patients with high TV had significantly shorter biochemical recurrence-free survivals than those with low TV (P < 0.001). Finally, based on multivariate Cox-proportional analyses, TV was revealed to be an independent predictor of postoperative biochemical recurrence as both categorical (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.42, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.13–1.78, P = 0.003] and continuous variables (HR: 1.04, 95% CI: 1.04–1.05, P < 0.001). TV was revealed to be an independent prognostic factor in the postoperative biochemical recurrence. Patients with a high number of positive core and longer tumor length were significantly related to higher TV.

Download Full-text

Preoperative Prediction of Surgical Margin Status in Patients With Prostate Cancer Treated by Radical Prostatectomy

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2000.18.15.2862 ◽

2000 ◽

Vol 18 (15) ◽

pp. 2862-2868 ◽

Cited By ~ 106

Author(s):

Liang Cheng ◽

Jeff Slezak ◽

Erik J. Bergstralh ◽

Robert P. Myers ◽

Horst Zincke ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Prostate Cancer ◽

Radical Prostatectomy ◽

Confidence Interval ◽

Odds Ratio ◽

Surgical Margin ◽

Margin Status ◽

Surgical Margins ◽

Positive Surgical Margin ◽

Biopsy Specimens ◽

Preoperative Serum

PURPOSE: We sought to determine the preoperative factors associated with surgical margin status in patients who underwent radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study group consisted of 339 patients who were treated by radical retropubic prostatectomy and bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy at the Mayo Clinic. None received preoperative adjuvant therapy. The mean age at the time of surgery was 66 years (range, 45 to 79 years). All specimens were totally embedded and whole-mounted. Positive surgical margin was defined as the presence of cancer cells at the inked margins. Numerous pathologic characteristics in needle biopsies and preoperative clinical findings were analyzed. RESULTS: The overall margin positivity rate was 24%. In univariate analysis, preoperative serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, Gleason score, perineural invasion, percentage of cancer in the biopsy specimens, and number and percentage of biopsy cores involved by cancer were all associated with positive surgical margins. In multivariate analysis, preoperative serum PSA level (odds ratio for a doubling of PSA levels, 1.9; 95% confidence interval, 1.5 to 2.4; P < .001) and percentage of cancer in the biopsy specimens (odds ratio for a 10% increase, 1.3; 95% confidence interval, 1.2 to 1.4; P < .001) were predictive of margin status in radical prostatectomy. With use of preoperative serum PSA level and percentage of cancer in the biopsy as predictors of surgical margins, the overall accuracy as measured by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.74. CONCLUSION: Preoperative serum PSA level and percentage of cancer in the biopsy specimens were independently associated with surgical margin status in patients who underwent radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. The combination of these two factors provides a high level of predictive accuracy for margin status.

Download Full-text

Risk of recurrence in patients with positive surgical margin at apex only versus other locations after radical prostatectomy.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2019.37.7_suppl.124 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 37 (7_suppl) ◽

pp. 124-124

Author(s):

Masashi Kato ◽

Akiyuki Yamamoto ◽

Ryo Ishida ◽

Tohru Kimura ◽

Tomoyasu Sano ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Prostate Cancer ◽

Radical Prostatectomy ◽

Adjuvant Therapy ◽

Surgical Margin ◽

Operative Approach ◽

Positive Surgical Margin ◽

Grade Group ◽

Clinical Recurrence ◽

Prostate Cancer Death

124 Background: Some reported that positive surgical margin at radical prostatectomy (RP) was a prognostic factor of clinical recurrence and prostate cancer death, and others showed that was not necessarily true. The prostatic apex is most popular location of positive surgical margin at RP and the frequency of apex is reported to be about 20-40% of all positive cases. Prostatic apex is also reported to lack a well-defined capsule and to be hardly retracted during operation. In this study, we evaluated the effect of positive surgical margin at apex-only on prognosis after RP in a large cohort. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 1019 patients with prostate cancer who underwent radical prostatectomy without neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy at the hospitals that the authors were affiliated with between 2005 and 2013. The operative approach (open, laparoscopic, or robotic) was decided by each institution. All prostatectomy specimen slides were reviewed by a single genitourinary pathologist according to ISUP 2014 criteria. Recurrence following RP was defined according to AUA guidelines. Results: The median patient age was 67 (range, 45–80) years. The median initial PSA was 6.8 ng/ml (range, 0.4–82 ng/ml). The median follow-up period was 69 (range, 0.7–135) months. Pathological T stage was in 72.5% of pT2 (n = 739), 23.4% of pT3a (n = 238), and 4.1% of pT3b (n = 42). There were 163 Grade Group (GG) 1 cases, 502 GG 2, 217 GG 3, 39 GG 4, and 98 GG 5 cases. 372 cases had positive surgical margin. Details were 201 (54%) apex only, 57 (15%) anterior, 43 (12%) posterior, 76 (20%) lateral, 40 (11%) bladder. Some patients showed multiple positive surgical margin. The patients with positive surgical margin at apex-only showed significantly better prognosis than other locations (P = 0.0001). This result was confirmed in each operative approach (open; P = 0.008, laparoscopic; P = 0.001, robotic; P = 0.01). Conclusions: Among surgical margin positive patients after RP, those at prostatic apex-only showed lower biochemical recurrence than other locations regardless of operative approach. Physician should follow such a patient carefully without adjuvant therapy.

Download Full-text