scholarly journals O curioso caso do homem plano de Patrícia Portela: uma leitura desestabilizadora

Letras ◽  
2016 ◽  
pp. 65
Author(s):  
Paulo Ricardo Kralik Angelini

Para cima e não para norte, de Patrícia Portela, apresenta o homem plano, personagem que desliza entre as linhas dos livros e concretiza-se no processo de leitura. Assumindo seu espaço na linhagem de narradores portugueses dramatizados e com consciência de si próprios, o texto de Portela encaminha-se num projeto performático, valendo-se de estratégias narrativas inovadoras, projeto gráfico interativo, contaminado por outras manifestações artísticas, como teatro, artes visuais e cinema, para provocar o leitor, sequestrando-o para dentro da obra. Como suporte teórico, autores como Wayne Booth, Paul Ricoeur, Paul Zumthor, Brian Richardson, Ricardo Piglia, Umberto Eco, entre outros.

2016 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 67-93
Author(s):  
Madeleine Stratford

Plusieurs représentants de la tradition herméneutique, dont Umberto Eco, Paul Ricoeur et George Steiner, considèrent le texte littéraire inachevé sans le concours du lecteur, lequel est cependant tenu d’en respecter la cohérence interne. Dans un tel contexte, l’affirmation selon laquelle le traducteur serait d’abord un lecteur constitue une évidence qui recèle, en soi, de multiples implications. Dans cet article, nous verrons d’abord comment l’oeuvre littéraire conditionne la lecture et, par conséquent, la traduction pour nous pencher ensuite sur la tension que présuppose la lecture d’un poème à traduire. Pour ce faire, nous comparerons cinq modèles décrivant le processus de traduction poétique des théoriciens suivants : Robert De Beaugrande, Andrei Bantaş, Francis R. Jones, Christopher Millis et Robert Bly. Ceux-ci s’inscrivent, selon nous, dans la lignée herméneutique en ceci qu’ils préconisent une lecture attentive du poème source, mais cherchent à en contrebalancer les effets par une révision obligatoire minimisant l’apport subjectif du traducteur. L’analyse de ces modèles permettra de constater l’importance réelle de la lecture dans la tâche du traducteur de poésie.


Author(s):  
Gary A. Phillips

This chapter describes a variety of self-identified ethical-critical readings of biblical narrative. The essay situates narrative ethics in relation to the “turn to ethics” traversing literary, philosophical, and biblical studies. Narrative ethics is seen as a multidisciplinary critical and creative response to contested assumptions about the nature of self, society, and ethical responsibility and the urgent need to assess the ethical impact biblical narratives and their readings have on readers. Biblical readings are discussed in terms of their philosophical, ethical, and rhetorical influences, in particular the Aristotelian virtue ethics and phenomenological/hermeneutical traditions. The contributions of Wayne Booth, Paul Ricoeur, and Emmanuel Levinas’s are traced. The chapter concludes with a narrative-ethical reading of Luke 10:38–42 using Levinas’s notions of the “face” and “excessive responsibility” to demonstrate ethical engagement with a problematic text and its commentators.


2012 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 92-109
Author(s):  
Gilbert Vincent

It is acknowledged that the study of metaphor is a key inflection in Ricœur’s heremeneutics. It is perhaps less well known that this study is concomittant with one of parables, which represents an equally noteworthy inflection in Ricœur’s contribution to Biblical hermeneutics. Some, however, use this concommitance to argue that the transfer of some theological presuppositions (as to the nature of language and the Truth) is facilitated by this and then do not hesitate to claim that the pages devoted to tha analogia entis, in The Rule of Metaphor, are proof of the presence of dubious theological interests in the development of his theory of metaphor. To counter this devastating critique, this article draws from some analyses by Umberto Eco, which imply that the relation between analogia entis and metaphor are not epistemologically scandalous as well as Alain, who sketched out an interpretation of parables which is very close to Ricœur’s.


2010 ◽  
Vol 7 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 203-210
Author(s):  
Valdés Mario J.
Keyword(s):  

2013 ◽  
Vol 34 (109) ◽  
pp. 3
Author(s):  
Jorge Enrique González
Keyword(s):  

<p>Hace cien años nació en Valence (Francia) el filósofo Paul Ricoeur. Su obra ha sido objeto de variados análisis, y ha sido el origen de una gran cantidad de estudios filosóficos así como propios del ámbito las ciencias humanas y sociales contemporáneas. En estas breves líneas, se quiere rendir homenaje a uno de los pensadores más importantes del siglo XX y comienzos del XXI, destacando no solo su trabajo estrictamente filosófico, sino una peculiaridad de su trabajo que lo aproxima de manera decisiva a algunas de las disciplinas de las ciencias humanas y sociales.</p>


Author(s):  
Adrián Bertorello

RESUMENEl trabajo examina críticamente la afirmación central de la hermenéutica de Paul Ricoeur, a saber, que el soporte material de la escritura es el rasgo determinante para que una secuencia discursiva sea considerada como un texto. La escritura cancela las condiciones fácticas de la enunciación y crea, de este modo, un ámbito de sentido estable en el que se puede validar una concepción de la subjetividad que está implicada en las dos estrategias de lecturas (el análisis estructural y la apropiación), esto es, un sujeto pasivo que se constituye por la idealidad del significado. Asimismo, el trabajo intentará precisar una serie de ambigüedades en el uso que Ricoeur hace del «ser en el mundo» para sostener la referencialidad del discurso.PALABRAS CLAVETEXTO, ESCRITURA, REFERENCIA, SUBJETIVIDAD, MUNDOABSTRACTThis paper critically examines the main assertion of Paul Ricoeur´s hermeneutics, i.e., that the material base of writing is the determining feature to consider a discursive sequence as a text. Writing cancels the factual conditions of enunciation and creates, in this way, a background of stable meaning where it is possible to validate a conception of subjectivity implicated in the two reading strategies (the structural analysis and the appropriation), i.e., a passive subject constituted by the ideality of meaning. Likewise, this paper aims to clarify some ambiguities in the way Ricoeur uses the «beings in the world» to support the discourse referentiality.KEY WORDSTEXT, WRITING, REFERENCE, SUBJECTIVITY, WORLD


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document