scholarly journals Screw Pullout Strength in Particleboards Manufactured with Waste of Eucalyptus grandis Wood Specie and Oat Hulls

2014 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 162-167 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amós M. de Souza ◽  
Luciano D. Varanda ◽  
Fabiane S. Ferro ◽  
André L. Christoforo ◽  
Felipe H. Icimoto ◽  
...  
2014 ◽  
Vol 36 (3) ◽  
pp. 405 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luciano Donizeti Varanda ◽  
André Luis Christoforo ◽  
Diego Henrique de Almeida ◽  
Diogo Aparecido Lopes Silva ◽  
Túlio Hallak Panzera ◽  
...  

1998 ◽  
Vol 11 (04) ◽  
pp. 200-204 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Kelly ◽  
G. S. Martin ◽  
D. J. Burba ◽  
S. A. Sedrish ◽  
R. M. Moore

SummaryThe purpose of the study was to determine and to compare the in vitro pullout strength of 5.5 mm cortical versus 6.5 mm cancellous bone screws inserted in the diaphysis and metaphysis of foal third metacarpal (MCIII) bones in threaded 4.5 mm cortical bone screw insertion holes that were then overdrilled with a 4.5 mm drill bit. This information is relevant to the selection of a replacement screw if a 4.5 mm cortical screw is stripped during orthopaedic surgery. In vitro pullout tests were performed in two independent cadaver studies, each consisting of 12 foal MCIII bones. Two 4.5 mm cortical screws were placed either in the mid-diaphysis (study 1) or distal metaphysis (study 2) of MCIII bones. The holes were then overdrilled with a 4.5 mm bit and had either a 5.5 mm cortical or a 6.5 mm cancellous screw inserted; screw pullout tests were performed at a rate of 0.04 mm/s until screw or bone failure occurred.The bone failed in all of the tests in the diaphyseal and metaphyseal bone. The holding power for 6.5 mm cancellous screws was significantly (p <0.05) greater than for 5.5 mm cortical screws in both the diaphysis and metaphysis. There was not any difference in the holding power of screws in either the diaphysis or the metaphysis between proximal and distal screw holes.If a 4.5 mm cortical bone screw strips in MCIII diaphyseal or metaphyseal bone of foals, a 6.5 mm cancellous screw would provide greater holding power than a 5.5 mm cortical screw.In order to provide information regarding selection of a replacement screw if a 4.5 mm cortical screw is stripped, the in vitro pullout strength was determined for 5.5 mm cortical and 6.5 mm cancellous screws inserted in third metacarpal diaphyseal and metaphyseal bone of foals in which threaded 4.5 mm cortical bone screw insertion holes had been overdrilled with a 4.5 mm bit. The holding power of the 6.5 mm cancellous screw was significantly greater than the 5.5 mm cortical screw in both the diaphysis and metaphysis of foal third metacarpal bone. Thus, it appears that if a 4.5 mm cortical screw is stripped during orthopaedic surgery in foals, a 6.5 mm cancellous screw would provide superior holding power.


2011 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 73-77
Author(s):  
Jiujin XIAO ◽  
Jian ZHANG ◽  
Yumei HUANG ◽  
Hongxing MA ◽  
Xudong LI

Holzforschung ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Edgar V.M. Carrasco ◽  
Rejane C. Alves ◽  
Mônica A. Smits ◽  
Vinnicius D. Pizzol ◽  
Ana Lucia C. Oliveira ◽  
...  

Abstract The non-destructive wave propagation technique is used to estimate the wood’s modulus of elasticity. The propagation speed of ultrasonic waves is influenced by some factors, among them: the type of transducer used in the test, the form of coupling and the sensitivity of the transducers. The objective of the study was to evaluate the influence of the contact pressure of the transducers on the ultrasonic speed. Ninety-eight tests were carried out on specimens of the species Eucalyptus grandis, with dimensions of 120 × 120 × 50 mm. The calibration of the pressure exerted by the transducer was controlled by a pressure gauge using a previously calibrated load cell. The robust statistical analysis allowed to validate the experimental results and to obtain consistent conclusions. The results showed that the wave propagation speed is not influenced by the pressure exerted by the transducer.


2021 ◽  
Vol 170 ◽  
pp. 375-389
Author(s):  
Alexandra Cemin ◽  
Fabrício Ferrarini ◽  
Matheus Poletto ◽  
Luis R. Bonetto ◽  
Jordana Bortoluz ◽  
...  

New Forests ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Linnan Ouyang ◽  
Roger J. Arnold ◽  
Shaoxiong Chen ◽  
Yaojian Xie ◽  
Shae He ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Stefan Kabisch ◽  
Caroline Honsek ◽  
Margrit Kemper ◽  
Christiana Gerbracht ◽  
Ayman M. Arafat ◽  
...  

Abstract Aims As the first long-term RCT on insoluble cereal fibre, the optimal fibre trial demonstrated glycometabolic benefits, confirming cohort studies. The combined study intervention of lifestyle recommendations and supplementation with insoluble oat hulls fibre allows to clarify, which amount of fibre is required for a beneficial effect. Methods One hundred and eighty participants with impaired glucose tolerance underwent the one-year PREDIAS lifestyle programme and received a blinded, randomized fibre or placebo supplement for two years. We conducted a regression analyses and cut-off-based tertile comparisons in subjects with full data on dietary compliance (food records and accounted supplement; n = 120) after one year, investigating effects on fasting blood parameters, oral glucose tolerance test and anthropometry. Results We found a nonlinear inverse relation between fibre intake and change in postprandial 2-h glucose levels, showing a metabolic benefit beyond 14 g and a plateau beyond 25 g of total insoluble fibre per day. 2-h glucose levels improved significantly stronger in both upper tertiles (−0.9 [−1.6;−0.2] mmol/l, p = 0.047, and −0.6 [−1.6;0.3] mmol/l, p = 0.010) compared to the lowest tertile (0.1 [−1.2;1.1] mmol/l), also when adjusted for changes in bodyweight. Subjects with the highest fibre intake showed superior effects on fasting and postprandial insulin resistance, hepatic insulin clearance, leucocyte count and fatty liver index. Conclusions Extending the knowledge on the benefits of insoluble oat hulls fibre, our post hoc analysis demonstrates a dose effect for glycaemia and associated metabolic markers. Further research is needed in order to replicate our findings in larger trials.


Author(s):  
Leandro Cantera ◽  
Raquel Alonso ◽  
Sandra Lupo ◽  
Lina Bettucci ◽  
Agostina Amilivia ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document