scholarly journals THE INFLUENCE OF SALIVARY CONTAMINATION ON SHEAR BOND STRENGTH OF PIT AND FISSURE SEALANT BY USE OF SEVERAL BONDING AGENTS

2012 ◽  
Vol 39 (2) ◽  
pp. 153-159 ◽  
Author(s):  
So-Yeon Park ◽  
Sung-Chul Choi ◽  
Young-Chul Choi ◽  
Kwang-Chul Kim ◽  
Jae-Hong Park
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Bonding Agents ◽  
Fissure Sealant ◽  
Pit And Fissure Sealant

scholarly journals Effect of saliva contamination and re-etching time on the shear bond strength of a pit and fissure sealant

2004 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 200-204 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gisele Maria Correr ◽  
Angela S. Caldo-Teixeira ◽  
Roberta Caroline Bruschi Alonso ◽  
Regina Maria Puppin-Rontani ◽  
Mário Alexandre Coelho Sinhoreti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Etching Time ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Distilled Water ◽  
Third Molars ◽  
Fissure Sealant ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Pit And Fissure Sealant ◽  
Saliva Contamination

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of saliva contamination (SCT) and re-etching time (RET) on the shear bond strength (SBS) of the Fluroshield sealant. Forty-five extracted third molars were sectioned and flattened until reach an enamel surface area. Then, all samples were etched for 30 sec with 35% phosphoric acid and then they were distributed into 9 groups (n=10) according to SCT and RET (seconds), respectively: G1- control (no SCT and no RET); G2- 30s and 0s; G3- 60s and 0s; G4-30s and 2s; G5- 30s and 5s; G6- 30s and 15s; G7-60s and 2s; G8- 60s and 5s; G9- 60s and 15s. The sealant was applied according to the manufacturer's instructions. The samples were stored in distilled water at 37ºC for 72h and subjected to the SBS test. The results indicated that there was no statistically significant difference between the groups (p>0.05). However, it could be noticed that: 1- the longer the SCT, the lower the SBS values; 2 - the longer the RET, the higher the SBS values. It could be concluded that there was a tendency to the shortest SCT (30s) associated to the longest RET (5 and 15s) to reach similar SBS values for the control group.

scholarly journals Shear bond strength and microleakage of a new self-etch adhesive pit and fissure sealant

2018 ◽  
Vol 37 (2) ◽  
pp. 266-271 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vinay PITCHIKA ◽  
Sebastian BIRLBAUER ◽  
Meng-Ling CHIANG ◽  
Christoph SCHULDT ◽  
Alexander CRISPIN ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Fissure Sealant ◽  
Pit And Fissure Sealant ◽  
Self Etch

scholarly journals Self-etch bonding agent beneath sealant: Bond strength for laser-irradiated enamel

2013 ◽  
Vol 07 (03) ◽  
pp. 289-295
Author(s):  
Maria Cristina Borsatto ◽  
Jackelline de Lemes Giuntini ◽  
Marta Maria Martins Giamatei Contente ◽  
Jaciara Miranda Gomes-Silva ◽  
Carolina Paes Torres ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Failure Modes ◽  
Third Molar ◽  
Bonding Agent ◽  
Yag Laser ◽  
Fissure Sealant ◽  
Etch And Rinse ◽  
Pit And Fissure Sealant ◽  
Self Etch

ABSTRACT Objectives: This study evaluated the in vitro shear bond strength (SBS) of a resin-based pit-and-fissure sealant (Fluroshield [F], Dentsply/Caulk) associated with either an etch-and-rinse (Adper Single Bond 2 [SB], 3M/ESPE) or a two-step self-etch adhesive system (Adper SE Plus [SE], 3M/ESPE) on Er: YAG laser-irradiated enamel. Materials and Methods: Seventeen sound third molar crowns were embedded in acrylic resin, and the mesial-distal enamel surfaces were flattened. The enamel sites were irradiated with a 2.94-μm wavelength Er: YAG laser (120 mJ, 4 Hz, noncontact mode/17 mm, 20 s). The specimens were randomly assigned to three groups according to the bonding technique: I - 37% phosphoric acid etching + SB + F; II - SE + F and III - F applied to acid-etched enamel, without an intermediate layer of bonding agent. In all of the groups, a 3-mm diameter enamel-bonding site was demarcated and the sealant cylinders were bonded. After 24 hours in distilled water, the shear bond strength was tested at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/minute. The data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and Tukey′s test. The debonded specimens were examined with a stereomicroscope to assess the failure modes. Results: The mean SBS values in MPa were I = 6.39 (±1.44); II = 9.50 (±2.79); and III = 5.26 (±1.82). No statistically significant differences were observed between groups I and III; SE/F presented a significantly higher SBS than that of the other groups (P = 0.001). With regard to the failure mode, groups I (65%) and II (75%) presented adhesive failures, while group III showed 50% adhesive failure. Cohesive failure did not occur. Conclusion: The application of the two-step self-etch bonding agent (Adper SE Plus) beneath the resin pit-and-fissure sealant placement resulted in a significantly higher bond strength for the Er:YAG laser-irradiated enamel.

scholarly journals Bonding agent underneath sealant: shear bond strength to oil-contaminated

2010 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 50-54 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Cristina Borsatto ◽  
Michelle Yamamoto Thomaz ◽  
Marta Maria Martins Giamatei Contente ◽  
Jaciara Miranda Gomes-Silva ◽  
Talitha de Siqueira Mellara ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Testing Machine ◽  
Adhesive System ◽  
Bonding Agent ◽  
Oil Contamination ◽  
Fissure Sealant ◽  
Pit And Fissure Sealant ◽  
Phosphoric Acid Etching

This study evaluated in vitro the shear bond strength of a resin-based pit-and-fissure sealant (Fluroshield - F) associated with either an ethanol-based (Adper Single Bond 2 - SB) or an acetone-based (Prime & Bond - PB) adhesive system under conditions of oil contamination. Mesial and distal enamel surfaces from 30 sound third molars were randomly assigned to 2 groups (n=30): I - no oil contamination; II - oil contamination. Contamination (0.25 mL during 10 s) was performed after 37% phosphoric acid etching with an air/oil spray. The specimens were randomly assigned to subgroups, according to the bonding protocol adopted: subgroup A - F was applied to enamel without an intermediate bonding agent layer; In subgroups B and C, SB and PB, respectively, were applied, light-cured, and then F was applied and light-cured. Shear bond strength was tested at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min in a universal testing machine. Means (± SD) in MPa were: IA-11.28 (±1.84); IIA-12.02 (±1.15); IB-9.73 (±2.38); IIB-9.62 (±2.29); IC-28.30 (±1.63); and IIC-25.50 (±1.91). It may be concluded that the oil contamination affected negatively the sealant bonding to enamel and the acetone-based adhesive system (PB) layer applied underneath the sealant was able to prevent its deleterious effects to adhesion.

scholarly journals Structure and the Shear Bond Strength of Two Pit and Fissure Sealants

2017 ◽  
Vol 54 (2) ◽  
pp. 393-395
Author(s):  
Viorica Tarmure ◽  
Radu Septimiu Campian ◽  
Ecaterina Ionescu ◽  
Doina Prodan ◽  
Mariana Pacurar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Clinical Performance ◽  
Resin Matrix ◽  
Fissure Sealants ◽  
Fissure Sealant ◽  
Pit And Fissure Sealants ◽  
Pit And Fissure Sealant ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Insight Into

Resin-based pit and fissure sealant materials are heterogeneous materials with two principal components: the resin matrix and the filler particles. The shear bond strength test holds great importance for providing insight into the adhesion of these materials and, also, it is a screening mechanism for predicting clinical performance. The purposes of the present study are to investigate the structure of surface and the shear bond strength for two commercial pit and fissure sealants, Fissurit (VOCO) and Pit and Fissure (DMP) sealer. Seal Fissurit had the highest shear strength, and the difference was statistically significant between two tested materials.

scholarly journals COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF THE SHEAR BOND STRENGTH OF THREE SELF-ETCH DENTIN BONDING AGENTS TO DENTIN: AN IN-VITRO STUDY

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (10) ◽  
pp. 454-459
Author(s):  
Bhalla V. ◽  
◽  
K. Goud M. ◽  
Chockattu S. ◽  
Khera A ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Testing Machine ◽  
Group Analysis ◽  
In Vitro Study ◽  
Bonding Agents ◽  
Mandibular Molar ◽  
Self Etch

Background:Dentin bonding is an ever-evolving field in adhesive dentistry. With the introduction of newer systems into the market, there is a crucial need to test their efficiency in terms of bond strength. Dual-cured adhesives in theory may provide for a better degree of conversion as compared to conventional light-cured adhesives .Thus, the aim of this study was to compare the shear bond strength of three different self-etch adhesives namely ClearfilSE bond (Kuraray), Tetric N Bond Universal (IvoclarVivadent) and Futura Bond DC (Voco) to dentin. Materials & Methods: Ninety extracted non-carious, intact human mandibular molar teeth were selected for this study. Each tooth was decoronated using a double-sided diamond disc with water coolant to a depth of 2mm from the cusp tip .The cut dentin surface was then abraded against 600-grit wet silicon carbide papers for 60 seconds to produce a uniform smear layer. The root portion of each tooth was mounted on a plastic ring using cold cure acrylic resin. Specimens were then divided into three adhesive groups of 30 teeth each, Group A: ClearfilSE Bond (Kuraray), Group B: Tetric N Bond Universal (IvoclarVivadent), Group C :Futura Bond DC (Voco). All bonding agents were used according to the manufacturers’ instructions, in combination with the resin composite Tetric N Ceram (IvoclarVivadent). The samples were thermocycled, followed by shear bond strength testing using a Universal testing machine (Hounsfield). Data were subjected to statistical analysis using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) (P<0.05) and Post hoc Tukey’s test for inter- and intra- group analysis respectively. Results: Clearfil SE Bond yielded the highest shear bond strength values (30.9 ±4.66 MPa) which were statistically significant, followed byTetric N Bond Universal group (29.8 ±4.34) and the lowest shear bond strength values were recorded for Futura Bond DC (18.2 ±3.13). Conclusion: Clearfil SE bond and Tetric N bond Universal can be considered as better options than Futura Bond DC.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document