scholarly journals Impact of protein intake and nutritional status on the clinical outcome of critically ill patients

2019 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Helânia Virginia Dantas dos Santos ◽  
Izabelle Silva de Araújo
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcome ◽  
Nutritional Status ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Critically Ill Patients ◽  
Protein Intake

scholarly journals Nutritional Management of Critically Ill Patients Infected with SARS-CoV-2

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (01) ◽  
pp. 002-005
Author(s):  
Sérgio dos Anjos Garnes ◽  
Fernanda Lasakosvitsch ◽  
Adriana Bottoni ◽  
Andrea Bottoni
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome ◽  
Clinical Outcome ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Prone Position ◽  
Critically Ill Patients ◽  
Protein Intake ◽  
Nutritional Therapy ◽  
Nutritional Management

AbstractEarly nutritional therapy is essential to ensure the maintenance of adequate energy/protein intake for critically ill patients infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome caused by COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. However, this poses a major challenge when it comes to individuals on mechanical ventilation in prone position. Therefore, the present work presents a nutritional therapy flowchart developed for patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection to guide nutritional management and ensure that energy/protein intake goals are met, thus favoring a positive clinical outcome.

scholarly journals Association of protein intake with the outcomes of critically ill patients: a post hoc analysis of the PermiT trial

2018 ◽  
Vol 108 (5) ◽  
pp. 988-996 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y M Arabi ◽  
H M Al-Dorzi ◽  
S Mehta ◽  
H M Tamim ◽  
S H Haddad ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Propensity Score ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Nitrogen Balance ◽  
Critically Ill Patients ◽  
Protein Intake ◽  
Nitrogen Excretion ◽  
Post Hoc Analysis ◽  
Lower Protein ◽  
Protein Group ◽  
Post Hoc

ABSTRACT Background The optimal amount of protein intake in critically ill patients is uncertain. Objective In this post hoc analysis of the PermiT (Permissive Underfeeding vs. Target Enteral Feeding in Adult Critically Ill Patients) trial, we tested the hypothesis that higher total protein intake was associated with lower 90-d mortality and improved protein biomarkers in critically ill patients. Design In this post hoc analysis of the PermiT trial, we included patients who received enteral feeding for ≥3 consecutive days. Using the median protein intake of the cohort as a cutoff, patients were categorized into 2 groups: a higher-protein group (>0.80 g · kg–1 · d–1) and a lower-protein group (≤0.80 g · kg–1 · d–1). We developed a propensity score for receiving higher protein. Primary outcome was 90-d mortality. We also compared serial values of prealbumin, transferrin, 24-h urinary nitrogen, and 24-h nitrogen balance on days 1, 7, and 14. Results Among the 729 patients included in this analysis, the average protein intake was 0.8 ± 0.3 g · kg–1 · d–1 [1.0 ± 0.2 g · kg–1 · d–1 in the higher-protein group (n = 365) and 0.6 ± 0.2 g · kg–1 · d–1 in the lower-protein group (n = 364); P < 0.0001]. There was no difference in 90-d mortality between the 2 groups [88/364 (24.2%) compared with 94/363 (25.9%), propensity score–adjusted OR: 0.80; 95% CI: 0.56, 1.16; P = 0.24]. Higher protein intake was associated with an increase in 24-h urea nitrogen excretion compared with lower protein intake, but without a significant change in prealbumin, transferrin, or 24-h nitrogen balance. Conclusions In the PermiT trial, a moderate difference in protein intake was not associated with lower mortality. Higher protein intake was associated with increased nitrogen excretion in the urine without a corresponding change in prealbumin, transferrin, or nitrogen balance. Protein intake needs to be tested in adequately powered randomized controlled trials targeting larger differences in protein intake in high-risk populations.

scholarly journals Protein intake and outcome of critically ill patients: analysis of a large international database using piece-wise exponential additive mixed models

Critical Care ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Wolfgang H. Hartl ◽  
Philipp Kopper ◽  
Andreas Bender ◽  
Fabian Scheipl ◽  
Andrew G. Day ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Discharge ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Acute Phase ◽  
Critically Ill Patients ◽  
Protein Intake ◽  
High Protein ◽  
Protein Diet ◽  
High Protein Intake ◽  
Low Protein ◽  
Standard Protein

Abstract Background Proteins are an essential part of medical nutrition therapy in critically ill patients. Guidelines almost universally recommend a high protein intake without robust evidence supporting its use. Methods Using a large international database, we modelled associations between the hazard rate of in-hospital death and live hospital discharge (competing risks) and three categories of protein intake (low: < 0.8 g/kg per day, standard: 0.8–1.2 g/kg per day, high: > 1.2 g/kg per day) during the first 11 days after ICU admission (acute phase). Time-varying cause-specific hazard ratios (HR) were calculated from piece-wise exponential additive mixed models. We used the estimated model to compare five different hypothetical protein diets (an exclusively low protein diet, a standard protein diet administered early (day 1 to 4) or late (day 5 to 11) after ICU admission, and an early or late high protein diet). Results Of 21,100 critically ill patients in the database, 16,489 fulfilled inclusion criteria for the analysis. By day 60, 11,360 (68.9%) patients had been discharged from hospital, 4,192 patients (25.4%) had died in hospital, and 937 patients (5.7%) were still hospitalized. Median daily low protein intake was 0.49 g/kg [IQR 0.27–0.66], standard intake 0.99 g/kg [IQR 0.89– 1.09], and high intake 1.41 g/kg [IQR 1.29–1.60]. In comparison with an exclusively low protein diet, a late standard protein diet was associated with a lower hazard of in-hospital death: minimum 0.75 (95% CI 0.64, 0.87), and a higher hazard of live hospital discharge: maximum HR 1.98 (95% CI 1.72, 2.28). Results on hospital discharge, however, were qualitatively changed by a sensitivity analysis. There was no evidence that an early standard or a high protein intake during the acute phase was associated with a further improvement of outcome. Conclusions Provision of a standard protein intake during the late acute phase may improve outcome compared to an exclusively low protein diet. In unselected critically ill patients, clinical outcome may not be improved by a high protein intake during the acute phase. Study registration ID number ISRCTN17829198

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document