The Influence of Verbalization of Discovered Numerical- or Sorting-Task Generalizations on Short-Term Retention in Connection with the Hendrix Hypothesis

1974 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 167-176
Author(s):  
Larry Sowder

Experimentation dealing with the influence of verbalizing a discovered generalization on retention of the ability to use the generalization has not given consistent results. The reported study sought information on whether the effects of 5 verbalizing methods (subject speaks, reads, writes, listens, or does not verbalize) were different on short-term retention of the ability to use discovered generalizations. During individual interviews, 50 college subjects gave evidence of having formed generalizations on 5 numerical or sorting tasks by giving successive correct responses, and then verbalized their discoveries according to one of the verbalizing methods. A retention test consisting of items amenable to the generalizations was administered 10 minutes later. Analyses of retention-test scores indicated no significant differences among the effects of the verbalizing methods, between effects of modes of verbalizing (oral, written), or between effects of sources of verbalizing (subject, external source).

1976 ◽  
Vol 7 (5) ◽  
pp. 276-289
Author(s):  
Robert Catanzano ◽  
Wanda Godwin

Thirty undergraduate students enrolled in a mathematics course for the elementary teacher were randomly assigned to three experimental groups. Each group was taught three unrelated mathematical concepts by one of three different sequences of instructional moves--a characterization-exemplification (CE) sequence, an exemplification-characterization-exemplification (ECE) sequence, or an exemplification-characterization-exemplification (interrogative) (ECEI) sequence. The purpose was to determine the effects of these three sequences on immediate acquisition and short-term retention of the concepts. Applying the analysis of variance to a randomized blocks design revealed that for certain concepts: (a) the CE sequence was more effective than either the ECE or the ECEI sequence on an immediate acquisition subtest containing low level items, (b) the ECE sequence was more effective than the CE sequence on a short-term retention test containing high level items, and (c) both the CE and the ECE were more effective on an immediate acquisition test containing high level items. No other significant differences on any of the criterion tests were found.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yang Zhao ◽  
Zong-yi Yuan ◽  
Han-ying Zhang ◽  
Xue Yang ◽  
Duo Qian ◽  
...  

Abstract BACKGROUNDBoth simulation-based training and video-based training are known to serve as educational adjuncts for learning TEE among medical students. In the present study, we hypothesized that simulation-based training would better enhance the performance of medical students in the interpretation of 20 cross-sectional views compared to video-based training.METHODSA total of 120 4th -year undergraduate medical students were enrolled in the present study. The study began with a pre-test of all the participants, followed by a 90-min theoretical lecture, after which the participants were required to undertake a post-test. Subsequently, the participants were randomly divided into the video-based group (Group V) and simulation-based group (Group S). Next, Group V received 60 min of TEE video learning, while Group S received 60 min of TEE simulator training. After the respective training, both the groups undertook the retention-test 1 and retention-test 2, one week and one month later, respectively. The overall accuracy demonstrated in each test was used to assess the performance of the participants in the interpretation of 5 views selected randomly from a set of 20 cross-sectional views.RESULTSNo statistically significant differences were observed in the overall accuracy in the pre-test and the post-test between the two groups. However, better overall accuracy was observed in Group S in both retention-test 1 and retention-test 2 compared to Group V.CONCLUSIONSFollowing a 90-min theoretical lecture, simulation-based training better enhanced the performance of medical students in the interpretation and short-term retention of 20 cross-sectional views compared to video-based training.


1987 ◽  
Vol 60 (3_part_2) ◽  
pp. 1099-1105
Author(s):  
Carlo Cipolli ◽  
Ivan Galliani

Rorschach test scores for male heroin users and nonusers ( ns = 15 each) were compared, to ascertain whether use of heroin influences intellectual impairment (as measured by such indicators of intellectual functioning as F+% and W+% responses). While the results show intellectual impairment to be greater in heroin users than in nonusers, the parametric and nonparametric indicators do not consistently show more marked impairment in long-term (4 to 5 yr. of addiction) than in short-term users (1 to 2 yr.). While intellectual functioning clearly seems influenced by heroin use, further research is required to ascertain the effect of the length of use either by comparing test and retest scores over a substantial interval or by matching samples including subjects with even longer careers of addiction.


1950 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 182-197 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. R. Cane ◽  
A. W. Heim

This is the third of a series of papers dealing with the effects of repeated retesting on intelligence test scores. It comprises an account of two further experiments, and a discussion of the four so far performed, since each throws light on the results of the others and it is their joint interpretation which is thought to be of value. The two earlier experiments consisted in repeated testing of a group of W.E.A. students and a group of mentally defective boys by an intelligence test (AH 4) designed for an unselected population. In the two later experiments, a group of Technical College students and a group of Naval Ratings were repeatedly tested on another intelligence test (AH 5), designed for a population of high-grade intelligence, such as university students. Examination of all the results confirms the artificiality of the “ceiling effect” which was suspected in the first experiment; it suggests that, given sufficient scope, subjects of all levels of intelligence would, with repeated trials on the same test, continue to improve their score up to and beyond 10 testing; and that, given comparable opportunity, subjects with initially higher scores will tend to improve more than those with initially lower scores. All these results concern short-term experiments with testing at weekly intervals. The four sets of results considered jointly indicate that conclusions on these problems should be drawn only in terms of the relation between the level of the test and that of the group tested: this offers some resolution of the conflicting findings of earlier investigators.


1995 ◽  
Vol 15 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 122
Author(s):  
R. Hijman ◽  
H.E. Hulshoff Pol ◽  
W.F.C. Baaré ◽  
J. van der Linden ◽  
R.S. Kahn

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document