Transforming Middle School Geometry Instruction

2019 ◽  
Vol 24 (7) ◽  
pp. 414-421
Author(s):  
Peter Wiles ◽  
Travis Lemon ◽  
Alessandra King

Students move from slides, flips, and turns into reasoning about the characteristics of rigid transformations.

1995 ◽  
Vol 1 (7) ◽  
pp. 516-518
Author(s):  
James M. Sconyers

Is proof perceived as being rigid and formal? Something that students should first encounter in high school? Does a concern involve students' having difficulty when they finally confront the idea of proof, perhaps in their high school geometry class? One likely reason for this unease with proof is that it is so often left out of any work in mathematics until students reach high school. They are then overwhelmed, since it is so unfamiliar. This outcome is not inevitable. Middle school students are capable of grasping the basic logic of proof and should be given the opportunity to encounter it.


2019 ◽  
Vol 22 (6) ◽  
pp. 655-659
Author(s):  
Андрей Александрович Масленков ◽  
Александр Ефимович Масленков ◽  
Сергей Александрович Масленков

Individual geometry projects for the seventh, eighth, and ninth grades of middle school were created. Each project contains twelve tasks. Each task is described using a drawing. By defending school geometry projects, students engage in the geometric battle.


2004 ◽  
Vol 9 (7) ◽  
pp. 392-397
Author(s):  
Brad Glass

Many of the new elementary sCHOOL and middle school mathematics curricula provide students with opportunities to encounter geometric transformations. Some of the curricula (e.g., MATHThematics, Math Trailblazers, and Investigations in Number, Data, and Space) introduce transformations (such as translations, reflections, and rotations) as motions (slides, flips, and turns) undergone by familiar shapes. How can we make the most of these experiences to ensure that our students are prepared for high school geometry courses? One way is to find out what students understand about transformations and to address any misconceptions they have regarding transformations. In working with eight eighth-grade prealgebra students, I identified one possible misconception as they completed a set of activities using The Geometer's Sketchpad (Jackiw 2001). The students focused on the path followed by a shape, rather than on the relationship between the preimage and image shapes, thereby leading them to incorrect conclusions regarding the equivalency of transformations. The technology-based activities helped some of the students begin to rectify this misconception.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document