HSR19-082: Epidemiological Findings and Outcomes in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients with Exon 20 Insertion Mutations: A Meta-Analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (3.5) ◽  
pp. HSR19-082
Author(s):  
Victoria Crossland ◽  
Aaron Galaznik ◽  
Huamao M. Lin ◽  
Dimitrios Tomaras ◽  
Shan Ashton Garib ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Egfr Mutation ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Egfr Mutations ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Exon 20 ◽  
Meta Analyses ◽  
Nsclc Patients ◽  
Insertion Mutations

Background: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations are frequently found in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Various EGFR mutations respond differently to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), and several TKIs have been approved for use on common mutations but none have been approved for EGFR exon 20 insertions, indicating a need for targeted therapy for this subpopulation. A systematic literature review (SLR) and meta-analysis were conducted to synthesize epidemiological and outcome data for the uncommon EGFR exon 20 insertion mutation. Methods: An SLR was performed on August 7, 2018 following the Preferred Reporting Item for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, using the Population, Intervention Comparators, Outcomes and Study Design (PICOS) criteria. Studies were identified based on a systematic search using key biomedical literature databases: EMBASE, MEDLINE, and Cochrane. Relevant congress abstracts published between 2015–2018 were also identified. Two independent reviewers screened all citations and full-text articles using PICOS-based criteria; any discrepancies were resolved by a third independent reviewer. Data were extracted into a predefined template for meta-analysis and summarized using the PRISMA flow diagram. Results: A total of 61 studies reporting the number of EGFR mutation−positive patients and/or NSCLC patients were identified. A meta-analysis found that 3.7% of EGFR mutation−positive patients and 0.8% of NSCLC patients harbored the EGFR exon 20 insertion, with geographic variations in epidemiology. There were 12, 10, and 12 studies, respectively, that reported overall survival, progression-free survival, and overall response rates in 2 cohorts, patients with EGFR exon 20 insertions and patients without EGFR exon 20 mutations. A Most patient populations in these studies included a mixture of treatment at various lines. A meta-analysis of outcomes across these studies showed that patients with EGFR exon 20 insertions experienced worse outcomes compared with those without the mutation (Table 1). Meta-analyses were weighted based on each study’s relevant population. No economic or quality of life studies were identified. Conclusions: Exon 20 insertion mutations represent an important subgroup of EGFR mutations in patients with NSCLC, and current therapies have limited efficacy. These relatively poor outcomes indicate a need for novel treatment strategies.

Assessment of EGFR mutations in patients diagnosed of squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e18106-e18106
Author(s):  
Francisco Lobo ◽  
Manuel Domine ◽  
Federico Rojo ◽  
Yann Izarzugaza ◽  
Ana Leon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Squamous Cell ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Egfr Mutation ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Egfr Mutations ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Exon 20 ◽  
Nsclc Patients

e18106 Background: Mutations in the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) predict a better outcome to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors than platinum-based chemotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Previous studies with Caucasian patients have shown a prevalence of EGFR mutation of 10-15%. The aim of this study is to analyze the prevalence of EGFR mutations in squamous-cell NSCLC patients from an area of influence of 500,000 habitants. Methods: Prospective mutation testing in NSCLC patients included in our institution since October 2010 to January 2012 was performed on DNA obtained from available tumor tissue and cytologic samples, using ARMS-scorpion TheraScreen EGFR 29 Mutation Test Kit (Qiagen). Results: From 218 consecutive NSCLC diagnoses, 18 (8.25%) patients showed EGFR mutations: 6 (33.3%) exon 19 deletion, 9 (50%) exon 21 mutations (7 L858R and 2 L861Q) and 3 (16.6%) cases exon 20 insertion. In the EGFR mutated population, 16 (88.88%) patients were diagnosed as adenocarcinoma and 2 (11.11%) as squamous cell carcinoma. The characteristics of these squamous cell cancer patients were: 2 male; 1 non-smoker, 1 former-smoker; 1 stage IV and 1 stage IB at diagnosis; one case exon 20 insertion and one exon 21 mutation (L858R). Conclusions: The EGFR mutation rate in squamous-cell NSCLC patients in our referral area is superior (11.17%) than previously reported, reinforcing the importance of including EGFR mutation testing in squamous-cell NSCLC population for selecting optimal therapy for these patients.

scholarly journals Sensitivity to Immune Checkpoint Blockade in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients with EGFR Exon 20 Insertion Mutations

Genes ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (5) ◽  
pp. 679
Author(s):  
Giulio Metro ◽  
Sara Baglivo ◽  
Guido Bellezza ◽  
Martina Mandarano ◽  
Alessio Gili ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Egfr Mutation ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Blockade ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Exon 20 ◽  
Line Setting ◽  
Insertion Mutations

Besides platinum-based chemotherapy, no established treatment option exists for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with EGFR exon 20 (Ex20ins) insertion mutations. We sought to determine the clinical outcome of patients with this EGFR mutation subtype in the immunotherapy era. Thirty NSCLCs with EGFR Ex20ins mutations were identified, of whom 15 had received immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) treatment as monotherapy (N = 12), in combination with chemotherapy (N = 2) or with another immunotherapeutic agent (N = 1). The response rate was observed in 1 out of 15 patients (6.7%), median progression-free survival (PFS) was 2.0 months and median overall survival (OS) was 5.3 months. A trend towards an inferior outcome in terms of PFS and OS was observed for patients receiving ICB treatment in the first versus second line setting (PFS: 1.6 months versus 2.7 months, respectively, p = 0.16—OS: 2.0 months versus 8.1 months, respectively, p = 0.09). Median OS from the time of diagnosis of advanced disease was shorter for patients treated with ICB versus those who did not receive immunotherapy (12.9 months versus 25.2 months, respectively, p = 0.08), which difference remained associated with a worse survival outcome at multivariate analysis (p = 0.04). Treatment with ICB is poorly effective in NSCLCs with EGFR Ex20ins mutations, especially when given in the first-line setting. This information is crucial in order to select the optimal treatment strategy for patients with this subtype of EGFR mutation.

scholarly journals Incorporation of EGFR mutation status into M descriptor of new TNM classification influences survival curves in non-small cell lung cancer patients

2019 ◽  
Vol 53 (4) ◽  
pp. 453-458
Author(s):  
Karmen Stanic ◽  
Nina Turnsek ◽  
Martina Vrankar
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Medical Records ◽  
Disease Burden ◽  
Egfr Mutation ◽  
Tnm Classification ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Egfr Mutations ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Mutation Status ◽  
Nsclc Patients

Abstract Background The 8th edition of tumor node metastasis (TNM) staging system for lung cancer introduced a revision of M descriptor. The limitation of new classification to predict prognosis is its focus on anatomical extent of the disease only. Information on molecular status of the tumor significantly influences treatment response and survival; however, data addressing this issue is scarce. This report points to the impact of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients on survival in view of new M descriptors of TNM classification system. Patients and methods Medical records of 479 consecutive metastatic NSCLC patients treated between 2009 and 2011, all tested for EGFR mutations, were retrospectively reviewed. For 355 patients medical records included sufficient information to be appropriately categorized into one of the new subgroups according to the M descriptor in 8th TNM classification, of those 89 (25.1%) patients harboured EGFR mutations (EGFR-m). Results Median overall survival (mOS) of EGFR-m patients was significantly longer than mOS of patients without EGFR mutations (20.6 months vs. 8.3 months, p < 0.001). Patients with limited disease burden (M1b sub-group) had the longest mOS among EGFR wild type patients (EGFR-wt) and also among EGFR-m patients, 14.4 months and 39.2 month, respectively. In spite of widespread metastatic disease of M1c EGFR-m patients, their mOS (18.8 months) was longer than mOS of oligometastatic EGFR-wt patients (M1b), who had the lowest disease burden (14.4 months). Median follow up was 53.9 months. Conclusions Incorporation of EGFR mutation status in advanced NSCLC further differentiates survival curves of M categories in 8th TNM classification and more precisely predicts survival compared to number of metastasis or number of metastatic sites alone.

Prospective analysis of the epidermal growth factor receptor gene mutations in non-small cell lung cancer in Japan

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7077-7077 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Morikawa ◽  
A. Inoue ◽  
T. Suzuki ◽  
T. Fukuhara ◽  
S. Suzuki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Egfr Mutation ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Egfr Mutations ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Epidermal Growth ◽  
Nsclc Patients

7077 Background: Previous clinical trials have revealed that gefitinib is more likely to be effective in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with activating somatic mutations of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). Most of those reports evaluated NSCLC patients who had post-operative recurrence and then received gefitinib retrospectively using their surgical specimens. However, many NSCLC patients are inoperable at diagnosis. Thus we conducted this study to examine EGFR mutation status by diagnostic tumor samples before gefitinib treatment and investigate the correlation between EGFR mutation and the efficacy of gefitinib. Methods: We prospectively evaluated various tumor samples obtained from NSCLC patients who had never received gefitinib for EGFR mutations in exon 18–23. For patients treated with gefitinib after the examination of EGFR mutations, the response to gefitinib was also evaluated. Results: From June 2004 to November 2005, 91 patients with advanced or post-operative recurrent NSCLC enrolled onto this study and 104 tumor samples were obtained from transbronchial biopsies, effusions, as well as surgical specimens. Thirty-two mutations including deletions in exon 19 in 23 patients and L858R in 9 patients were detected among those 91 patients; 30 in 81 adenocaricinoma, 1 in 2 adenosquamous cell carcinoma, and 1 in 5 large cell carcinoma. The mutations were found more frequently in female (51.9%) than male (12.8%), in never smoker (52.0%) than smoker (14.6%). Response rate of gefitinib in patients with EGFR mutations was 65.0% (13 of 20) compared to 37.5% (3 of 8) in patients without mutations. Among 7 patients with EGFR mutations who were examined multiple tumor samples, 3 had the discrepancy of EGFR gene status between different samples obtained at different time points, suggesting genetic heterogeneity of their tumors. The EGFR status of the most recent samples is likely to be correlated to the response to gefitinib. Conclusions: The EGFR mutation analysis was possible not only from surgical specimens but also from daily available diagnostic samples. For patients with EGFR mutations, gefitinib could achieve a promising high response rate. We propose to examine the most recent tumor samples to predict the sensitivity to gefitinib reliably. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Prevalence of EGFR mutations in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) smoker patients.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e21015-e21015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yann Izarzugaza ◽  
Manuel Domine ◽  
Federico Rojo ◽  
Victoria Casado ◽  
Ana Leon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Egfr Mutation ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Egfr Mutations ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Exon 20 ◽  
Egfr Mutated ◽  
Exon 19

e21015 Background: Mutations in the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) predict a better response to tyrosine kinase inhibitors compared to platinum-based chemotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Previous studies in caucasian population have reported a frequency of EGFR mutation of 10-15%. The aim of this study is to analyze the prevalence of EGFR mutations in caucasian smoker patients with NSCLC. Methods: Prospective mutation testing in NSCLC patients included in our institution since October 2010 to January 2012 was performed on DNA obtained from available tumor tissue and cytologic samples, using ARMS-scorpion TheraScreen EGFR 29 Mutation Test Kit (Qiagen). Results: From 218 consecutive NSCLC diagnoses, 18 (8.25%) patients showed EGFR mutations: 6 (33.3%) exon 19 deletions, 9 (50%) exon 21 mutations (7 cases L858R and 2 cases L861Q) and 3 (16.6%) exon 20 insertions. In the EGFR-mutated patients, 13 (72.25%) were never-smoker and 5 (27.7%) were smoker (3 current-smoker and 2 former-smoker). The EGFR-mutated smoker population showed the following characteristics: 3 female, 2 male; 4 adenocarcinoma, one squamous cell carcinoma; 3 stage IV, 2 stage IA at diagnosis; 1 (20%) case EGFR deletion exon 19, 1 (20%) case insertion exon 20 and 3 patients (60%) mutation exon 21 (2, L858R and 1, L861Q). Conclusions: The EGFR mutation rate in NSCLC smoking patients in our referral area is superior (27.7%) than previously reported, reinforcing the importance of including EGFR mutation testing in NSCLC smoking population for the correct management of these patients.

Treatment outcomes with tyrosine kinase inhibitors in patients with uncommon EGFR mutations in non-small cell lung cancer: A multi-centre retrospective analysis.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e20678-e20678
Author(s):  
Sarah Hunter ◽  
Guillermina Nickless ◽  
Karim El-Shakankery ◽  
Nadia Yousaf ◽  
Daniel Smith ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Stable Disease ◽  
Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Egfr Mutations ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Tki Treatment ◽  
Exon 20 ◽  
Nsclc Patients

e20678 Background: The clinical significance of common epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations (exon 19 deletions and exon 21 L858 mutations) in non-small cell lung cancer is well known1. However, 2-8% of NSCLC patients harbour an uncommon EGFR mutation2. Prognosis and response to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) is unclear in this subgroup. The most frequent uncommon EGFR mutations are exon 18 G719 and exon 21 L861. Although not frequently reported, these appear to have favourable outcomes with TKIs3. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of all patients with uncommon EGFR mutations identified at laboratories in 4 UK centres, between 2012 and 2016. Patient’s not treated with a TKI were excluded. Techniques including cold PCR were in use at contributing laboratories. The T790M resistance mutation was excluded from our study. For patients with uncommon EGFR mutations, patient characteristics and response to TKIs were analysed. Results: 29 patients with uncommon EGFR mutations, with both rare point mutations (86%) and deletions (14%), were identified. All patients were treated with a TKI. Age ranged from 37 to 85 (median 67). The majority (86%) of patients were performance status 1. TKIs used were afatinib (31%), gefitinib (24%) and erlotinib (45%). 19 patients (66%) benefitted from TKI treatment (38% partial response (PR), 28% stable disease (SD). 10 patients (34%) did not respond, including all four with exon 20 mutations. 15 mutations were exon 18 G719 mutations: 40% had a PR and 40% stable disease with TKI therapy. There were two L861 mutations, both responded with a PR. 13 patients remained on TKI treatment at data cut off. The median progression free survival at this time was 8.1months. Tabulated details of response according to mutation will be presented. Conclusions: The majority (66%) of NSCLC patients with uncommon EGFR mutations benefitted from TKI therapy in this series. These high clinical benefit rates, typified by patients with G719 mutation, are in line with the limited previous reports 1,3. Exon 20 mutations were associated with TKI resistance, in line with the literature4.

scholarly journals Bevacizumab for non-small cell lung cancer patients with brain metastasis: A meta-analysis

Open Medicine ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 589-597
Author(s):  
Ping Liang ◽  
Yu-Dong Wang ◽  
Zong-Min Wei ◽  
Qi-Jun Deng ◽  
Tong Xu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Lung Cancer Patients ◽  
Meta Analyses ◽  
Nsclc Patients

AbstractThis study evaluates the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab (BEV) in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with brain metastases (BM) by performing meta-analyses of response and survival indices. Seventeen studies were included. BEV treatment was associated with a lower new BM incidence (hazard ratio: 0.30 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.14, 0.46]) during follow-up. Disease control rate (DCR) of BEV-treated patients with BM was 91% [95% CI: 85, 95]. However, intracranial DCR was relatively higher (94% [95% CI: 87, 98]) than extracranial DCR (86% [95% CI: 74, 96]). DCR of NSCLC patients with BM was significantly better with BEV than with control therapies (odds ratio: 2.71 [95% CI: 1.26, 5.86], P = 0.01). Progression-free survival (PFS) of BEV-treated patients with and without BM was 7.1 months [95% CI: 6.2, 8.0] and 7.4 months [95% CI: 6.3, 8.4], respectively. Intracranial PFS of BEV-treated patients with BM was 8.0 months [95% CI: 6.0, 10.0]. Overall survival of BEV-treated NSCLC patients with and without BM was 13.5 months [95% CI: 11.4, 15.6] and 12.5 months [95% CI: 10.2, 14.8], respectively. The incidence of bleeding/hemorrhage in the central nervous system was 1% with BEV treatment.

scholarly journals Clinical Characteristics of Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer with EGFR Exon 20 Insertions

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chie Morita ◽  
Tatsuya Yoshida ◽  
Masayuki Shirasawa ◽  
Ken Masuda ◽  
Yuji Matsumoto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Clinical Characteristics ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Egfr Mutations ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
Exon 20 ◽  
Insertion Mutations

Abstract Background: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 20 insertion mutations account for 4%–10% of all EGFR mutations in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, data on the differences in clinical characteristics between patients with EGFR exon 20 insertion mutations and major mutations (exon 19 deletion and L858R) are limited. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed advanced NSCLC patients with EGFR mutations, including EGFR exon 20 insertions and major mutations, who were treated with systemic therapy between January 2011 and December 2019.Results: We identified 23 patients with EGFR exon 20 insertions and 534 patients with EGFR mutations. Among patients with exon 20 insertion, the median age was 60 years (range: 27–88 years), and females and never smokers were predominant. The clinical characteristics of patients with exon 20 insertions were similar to those with major EGFR mutations. Regarding the clinical outcomes in patients with exon 20 insertions, 17 patients received platinum doublet as first-line therapy, and the overall response rate (ORR) and median progression-free survival (mPFS) were 11.8% and 8.9%. Additionally, eight patients received anti-PD-1 antibodies and seven patients received EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in any-line therapy, and their ORR and mPFS were 0%, 25% and 2.2, 3.1 months, respectively. Overall survival was significantly shorter in patients with exon 20 insertions than in those with EGFR major mutations (29.3 vs. 43.4 months, p=0.04). Conclusions: The clinical outcomes in patients with exon 20 insertions were not satisfactory compared to those in patients with major EGFR mutations.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document