scholarly journals The Recon Pilot Project: A Progress Report, October 1970-May 1971

1971 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 159
Author(s):  
Henriette D. Avram ◽  
Lenore S. Maruyama
Keyword(s):  
Task Force ◽  
Pilot Project ◽  
Progress Report ◽  
Library Of Congress ◽  
Test Format

<p class="p1">Synopsis of three progress reports on the <span class="s1">RECON </span>Pilot Project submitted by the Library of Congress to the Council on Library <span class="s1">Resourc</span><span class="s2">es </span>covering the period October 1970-May 1971. Progress is<span class="s3"> </span>r<span class="s4">e</span>ported in the following areas: RECON production, foreign languag<span class="s4">e </span><span class="s2">editing </span>test, format recognition, microfilming, input d<span class="s4">ev</span>ic<span class="s4">e</span>s, and tasks assigned to the RECON Working Task Force.</p>

scholarly journals Recon Pilot Project: A Progress Report, April-September 1970

1971 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 38
Author(s):  
Henriette D. Avram ◽  
Lenore S. Maruyama
Keyword(s):  
Task Force ◽  
Pilot Project ◽  
Progress Report ◽  
Title Page ◽  
Library Of Congress ◽  
The Third ◽  
Library Resources ◽  
The Status

<div class="page" title="Page 1"><div class="section"><div class="layoutArea"><div class="column"><p><span>A synopsis of the third progress report on the RECON Pilot Project submitted by the Library of Congress to the Council on Library Resources. An overview is given of the progress </span><span>made </span><span>from April through September 1970 in the following areas: RECON production, format recognition, research titles, microfilming, and investigation of </span><span>input </span><span>devices. In addition, the status of the tasks assigned to the RECON Working Task Force are briefly described.</span></p></div></div></div></div>

scholarly journals The Recon Pilot Project: A Progress Report, November 1969 - April 1970

1970 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 230
Author(s):  
Henriette D. Avram ◽  
Kay D. Guiles ◽  
Lenore S. Maruyama
Keyword(s):  
Task Force ◽  
Pilot Project ◽  
Progress Report

<p><span>A synthesis of the second </span><span>progress report </span><span>submitted </span><span>by </span><span>the Library </span><span>of </span><span>Congress </span><span>to the </span><span>Council on Library </span><span>Resources under a </span><span>grant </span><span>for </span><span>the </span><span>RECON Pilot Project. An overview of the </span><span>progress made </span><span>from </span><span>November </span><span>1969 to </span><span>April </span><span>1970 </span><span>in the </span><span>following areas: production, </span><span>Official </span><span>Catalog comparison, </span><span>format re</span><span>cognition, </span><span>research </span><span>titles, microfilming, </span><span>investigation of inptut devices. </span><span>In </span><span>addition, </span><span>the </span><span>status </span><span>of </span><span>the </span><span>tasks </span><span>assigned to the </span><span>RECON Working Task Force are </span><span>briefly </span><span>described.</span></p>

A Progress Report from the BCIA Neurofeedback Certification Task Force

Biofeedback ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 42 (4) ◽  
pp. 135-136
Author(s):  
Judy Crawford ◽  
Fred Shaffer
Keyword(s):  
Task Force ◽  
Progress Report ◽  
Muscle Dysfunction ◽  
Certification Program ◽  
Professional Certification ◽  
The Past ◽  
Certification Programs ◽  
Science Technology ◽  
International Alliance ◽  
Current Science

Professional certification programs must continuously assess and improve their blueprints, exams, and reading lists to stay relevant. In 2009, the Biofeedback Certification International Alliance (BCIA) revised its biofeedback and neurofeedback certification programs under the leadership of Randy Neblett and Leslie Sherlin. In 2012, BCIA revamped the Pelvic Muscle Dysfunction Biofeedback program under the guidance of Debbie Callif. For the past 8 months, BCIA's Neurofeedback Task Force, led by Genie Davis, has collaborated with its stakeholders to revise the entire neurofeedback certification program to continue to reflect current science, technology, and practice standards. This article explains the goals and process that guided this herculean effort.

A 2.3L Engine Deposit and Wear Test-An ASTM Task Force Progress Report

1978 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dean C. Bardy ◽  
Thomas M. Franklin ◽  
Charles E. Roberts
Keyword(s):  
Task Force ◽  
Wear Test ◽  
Progress Report ◽  
Engine Deposit

scholarly journals THE LAW SOCIETY OF UPPER CANADA AND ACCESS TO JUSTICE: LESSONS FROM LAWYER-LICENSING REFORM

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 121 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Wiseman
Keyword(s):  
Present Article ◽  
Task Force ◽  
Legal Profession ◽  
Pilot Project ◽  
Access To Justice ◽  
Legal Services ◽  
Upper Canada ◽  
Institutional Approach ◽  
The Law ◽  
Legal Training

The process for licensing new lawyers in Ontario is in the midst of significant change following the Law Society of Upper Canada’s approval of a recommendation by it’s Articling Task Force to introduce of a 3-year pilot project that will provide a program of practical legal training as an alternative to articling.  This article describes and critically analyzes these changes and the process that led to them in relation to three aspects of access to justice: access to the legal profession, access to legal services, and access to legal governance.  The analysis reveals numerous shortcomings that provide lessons that could be applied to the proposal for evaluating the pilot project as well as to the Law Society’s recently announced initiative to overhaul its institutional approach to access to justice. Le processus d’accès à la profession qui s’applique aux nouveaux avocats en Ontario fait actuellement l’objet de changements importants. Le Barreau du Haut-Canada a approuvé un projet pilote de trois ans recommandé par son Groupe de travail sur le stage, dans le cadre duquel il sera possible de suivre un programme de pratique du droit plutôt que de faire un stage. Le présent article décrit et analyse de façon critique ces changements – ainsi que le processus ayant mené aux changements – par rapport à trois aspects de l’accès à la justice : l’accès à la profession juridique, l’accès aux services juridiques et l’accès à la gouvernance juridique. L’analyse fait ressortir de nombreuses lacunes qui pourraient servir de leçons à appliquer à la proposition d’évaluation du projet pilote ainsi qu’à l’initiative récemment annoncée du Barreau visant à réviser son approche institutionnelle à l’accès à la justice.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document