scholarly journals Correction: Bibliometric analysis of publications from North Korea indexed in the Web of Science Core Collection from 1988 to 2016

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 111-111
Author(s):  
Geum Hee Jeong ◽  
Sun Huh
Bibliosphere ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 49-60
Author(s):  
A. V. Glushanovskiy

The article analyzes the changes in the bibliometric characteristics of the array of Russian publications reflected in the Web of Science Core Collection (WoS CC database) in the field of physics in 2018, compared to the same characteristics in 2010. The main parameter to assess the quality (research level) of arrays with bibliometric point of view was “Comprehensive index of quality” (CIQ) for the array of publications, calculated on the basis of one of the parameters in “Method for calculating the qualitative indicator of the state task “the Comprehensive performance score publication”...”, used by the Ministry of science and higher education of the Russian Federation. It was found that with an almost twofold increase in the volume of the array, there was a slight decrease in its quality in terms of CIQ in 2018 in comparison with 2010. The author also compared the characteristics of the array of Russian publications in 2018 with similar ones of the arrays on physical publications in Germany, India and Great Britain, located close to Russia in the ranking by the number of publications included in the WoS array (in this ranking, Russia was on the fourth place in 2018). In the ranking based on the CIQ indicator, the arrays of these countries are significantly ahead of the Russian one, and our country is only on the sixth place. The main reasons for this lag in the Russian publications array are identified. They are: a lower percentage of Russian publications in high-quartile journals and a greater number of publications from conference proceedings. The conclusion is made about the applicability of bibliometric analysis to identify trends in publishing activities in the scientific field.


Author(s):  
Ivanna Shubina ◽  
Oleh Plakhotnik ◽  
Olha Plakhotnik

There has been emerging interest in the effectiveness of technology usage in professional education for establishing various competences among future educators. However, the field still lacks in holistic overviews of the role of technology for establishing various competences among future educators. The present bibliometric study was employed to identify and synthesize the results from studies exploring domains of professional education, technology and establishing competence. An author analyzed the papers published in highly ranked and cited journals which were indexed and ranked in the Web of Science Core Collection and Scopus, in the period of 2000 to 2020. The results demonstrated high interest in studied domains within various subjects and fields of study, demonstrating the interest in the opportunities which provide the technology for professional education and developing methodological competences.


2017 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 26-35 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmed Adam ◽  
Reuben Ras ◽  
Amit S. Bhattu ◽  
Avi Raman ◽  
Marlon Perera

Background: To perform the first comparative bibliometric analysis of the “Top 100 (T100) cited articles in prostate cancer (PCa)”. Materials and Methods: A comprehensive search using the Web of Science Database (v 5.21) covering the Web of Science™ Core Collection, BIOSIS Previews, Central Contents Connect, KCI-Korean Journal Database, MEDLINE, SciELO Index (February 2016) was performed, for all articles relevant to PCa. Results: The T100 were cited 582 to 3,387 times, and were published from 1966 to 2012. The top 3 subcategories associated with PCa included: genetics/biomarkers (n = 34), management (n = 25), and physiology (n = 11). T100 contributions from USA (n = 86), were most prominent. If the regional citation was corrected for percentage on research (citation record/percentage gross domestic product on research) a variation in the ranking was noted. Conclusion: The first bibliometric analysis in the field of PCa is presented. Regions that predominate the T100, include the United States and Europe. Articles published in higher impact factor journals, in English medium and content related to PCa research associated with genetics/bio-markers have the highest citation potential.


Author(s):  
Fei Zhai ◽  
Yuxuan Zhai ◽  
Chuang Cong ◽  
Tingyan Song ◽  
Rongwu Xiang ◽  
...  

Background: COVID-19 has become one of the most serious global epidemics in the 21st Century. This study aims to explore the distribution of research capabilities of countries, institutions, and researchers, and the hotspots and frontiers of coronavirus research in the past two decades. In it, references for funding support of urgent projects and international cooperation among research institutions are provided. Method: the Web of Science core collection database was used to retrieve the documents related to coronavirus published from 2003 to 2020. Citespace.5.6.R2, VOSviewer1.6.12, and Excel 2016 were used for bibliometric analysis. Results: 11,036 documents were retrieved, of which China and the United States have contributed the most coronavirus studies, Hong Kong University being the top contributor. Regarding journals, the Journal of Virology has contributed the most, while in terms of researchers, Yuen Kwok Yung has made the most contributions. The proportion of documents published by international cooperation has been rising for decades. Vaccines for SARS-CoV-2 are under development, and clinical trials of several drugs are ongoing. Conclusions: international cooperation is an important way to accelerate research progress and achieve success. Developing corresponding vaccines and drugs are the current hotspots and research directions.


2021 ◽  
pp. e00137
Author(s):  
Mahdi Fakhar ◽  
Masoud Keighobadi ◽  
Hajar Ziaei Hezarjaribi ◽  
Mahbobeh Montazeri ◽  
Elham S. Banimostafavi ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas McKay Parry ◽  
Justin Rich ◽  
Michael Erian ◽  
Thomas Lloyd

AbstractRationale and ObjectiveCitation-based metrics are frequently used to evaluate the academic performance of a publication. One such metric is the number of citations an article receives, however this is not an infallible index. To account for biases of this metric the category-normalised citation index (CNCI), termed ‘impact’, may be used. Here the 100 highest-cited and highest-CNCI articles in radiological literature, from 2009 – 2019 is performed.Materials and MethodsThe Web of Science Core Collection and InCites (Clarivate Analytics) databases were accessed for the citations and CNCI values for articles published in the 186 journals with category “radiology, nuclear medicine, and medical imaging” between 2009 and 2019. The top 100 articles with the highest citation count and highest CNCI values were collected. Article parameters were analysed including title, year of publication, citation count, CNCI, field of study and modality studied were analysed.ResultsFifty-three articles were common to both lists. Neuroradiology was the most prevalent subspecialty studied in both the highest-cited (n = 68) and highest-impact (n = 41) lists, respectively. The most frequently utilised imaging modality was magnetic resonance imaging (n = 64 and 40). The highest-CNCI articles demonstrated greater variability and distribution across subspecialties, imaging modalities and year of publication when compared to the highest-cited list.ConclusionThe use of normalised bibliometric analysis tools may remove bias when evaluating research and better demonstrate the breadth of research activity. Use of these tools may provide a more robust and contemporaneous review of the landscape of research within a field.


Nova Scientia ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (22) ◽  
pp. 478-500
Author(s):  
Jose Efren Leyva-Duarte ◽  
José de Jesús Chávez Martínez ◽  
Francisco Javier Pinedo-de-Anda ◽  
Juan Cayetano Niebla-Zatarain

Introduction: This article aims to provide an analysis of the information on scientific research publications of Organizational culture available in the Web of Science. For this, a bibliometric analysis of the publications of the Web of Science Core Collection database on Organizational culture in the category of Management in the research area of Business economics was done.Method: The data obtained from a search of the Web of Science Core Collection database were subjected to a bibliometric analysis using VOSviewer software. The period analyzed was from 1980 to October 18, 2018, the date on which the bibliographic data was downloaded.     Results: In this section is showed the analysis of the data of the publications on Organizational Culture. Tables and network maps, top 25 most productive and cited authors, journals that more articles published, 40 publications most cited and main references most co-cited, is some information obtained in the analysis.Discussion or Conclusion: Our results of the bibliometric analysis showed that Organizational culture is maintained as an interest research subject and it provides a synthesis about of organizational culture research for new researchers.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document