scholarly journals Comparison of Two Multiple Imputation Procedures in a Cancer Screening Survey

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 293-312
Author(s):  
Coen A. Bernaards ◽  
Melissa M. Farmer
2013 ◽  
Vol 14 (11) ◽  
pp. 6459-6463 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mina Suh ◽  
Kui Son Choi ◽  
Yoon Young Lee ◽  
Boyoung Park ◽  
Jae Kwan Jun

2009 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hee-Soon Juon ◽  
Kui Son Choi ◽  
Eun-Cheol Park ◽  
Min-Son Kwak ◽  
Sunmin Lee

BMJ Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (7) ◽  
pp. e035495
Author(s):  
Jaeho Lee ◽  
Yeol Kim ◽  
Mina Suh ◽  
Seri Hong ◽  
Kui Son Choi

ObjectivesThis study aimed to examine the effect of underlying individual preferences for the present over that for the future on lung cancer screening participation.SettingWe analysed the data from the Korean National Cancer Screening Survey in 2018.Participants4500 adults aged 20–74 years old participated in the study.DesignIn this cross-sectional survey, multivariate logistic regression analysis was carried out to examine the association between subjects’ intention to participate in lung cancer screening and individual preferences. The underlying individual preferences were measured on the basis of the self-reported general willingness to spend money now in order to save money in the future and general preferences with regard to financial planning.Primary outcome measureIntention to participate in lung cancer screening.ResultsIndividuals eligible for lung cancer screening who place less value on their future were around four times less likely to report an intention to participate in lung cancer screening than were those who valued their future (OR 3.86, 95% CI 1.89 to 7.90). A present-biassed individual (one with a tendency for immediate gratification) was also about four times less likely to report an intention to participate in screening than an individual with no present bias (OR 0.26, 95% CI 0.12 to 0.57).ConclusionsUnderlying individual preferences regarding the present and future significantly affect individuals’ intention to participate in lung cancer screening. Hence, provision of incentives may be necessary to encourage the targeted heavy smokers who may have a strong preferences for the present over future.


2005 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael S. Wolf ◽  
Alfred Rademaker ◽  
Charles L. Bennett ◽  
Rosario Ferreira ◽  
Nancy C. Dolan ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 43 (3) ◽  
pp. 141-147 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eun-Ha Lee ◽  
Hoo-Yeon Lee ◽  
Kui Son Choi ◽  
Jae Kwan Jun ◽  
Eun-Cheol Park ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 1187-1191 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bo-Young Park ◽  
Kui-Son Choi ◽  
Yoon-Young Lee ◽  
Jae-Kwan Jun ◽  
Hong-Gwan Seo

Cancers ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 327
Author(s):  
Hye Young Shin ◽  
Bomi Park ◽  
Mina Suh ◽  
Kui Son Choi ◽  
Jae Kwan Jun

This study aimed to identify the association of marriage and childbirth with the adherence to cervical cancer screening among young adult women. Data across four years (2017–2020) of the cross-sectional Korean National Cancer Screening Survey were used. For measuring the adherence to cervical cancer screening, we used the cervical cancer screening rate with recommendation, which was defined as the percentage of women in the population eligible for screening who have had a cervical cancer screening within the past two years. Multiple logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify the association between marriage and adherence to cervical cancer screening. Overall, 3925 women aged 20–39 years were analyzed. Of these, 39.1% were screened for cervical cancer (26.6% unmarried and 57.1% married women). The married women had significantly higher adherence to cervical cancer screening than unmarried women (adjusted odds ratio = 2.80, 95% CI: 2.99–3.44). Compared with unmarried women, adherence to cervical cancer screening was significantly more likely to increase (p for trend, <0.001) in married women with an increased number of births. Our study confirmed that marriage and childbirth influence adherence to cervical cancer screening, suggesting that unmarried women may be vulnerable to cervical cancer.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document