e14032 Background: Stenting as a bridge to surgery has been increasingly applied in cases of acute left-sided colonic obstruction. This study aims to evaluate both the short and long-term outcomes associated with colonic stenting as a bridge to surgery in patients with obstructing adenocarcinoma of the colon. Methods: Patients with potentially curable acute left-sided colonic obstruction treated with stenting as a bridge to surgery (28) or with emergency surgical resection (39) from January 1998 to December 2008 were identified using a prospectively maintained database. Short-term data on post-operative mortality, morbidity, necessity of intensive care, and length of hospital stay were compared. Disease-free and overall survival data were also analyzed. Results: Patients within the two study arms had similar demographic profiles. Patients receiving preoperative stenting had a higher likelihood of a laparoscopic resection (p<0.001). Further, the emergency surgery group had a higher rate of post-operative complications (p=0.024), rate of ICU admission (p=0.013), and longer total length of stay (9 vs. 12 days, p=0.001). With a median follow-up of 26.5 and 31.3 months for the stenting and surgical resection groups respectively, there was no difference in overall and disease-free survival (overall survival = 30 vs. 31 months, p=0.858; DFS = 13 vs. 12 months, p=0.989). As well, there was no difference in the rate of systemic recurrences (8 vs. 13, p=0.991). Conclusions: Stenting as a bridge to surgery is a safe treatment strategy in the management of patients with acute left-sided colonic obstruction with improved short-term outcomes and comparable long-term oncologic results.
The value of preoperative controlling nutritional status score in evaluating short-term and long-term outcomes of patients with colorectal cancer following surgical resection
