scholarly journals Newly Identified Cancer-Associated Role of Human Neuronal Growth Regulator 1 (NEGR1)

2014 ◽  
Vol 5 (7) ◽  
pp. 598-608 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hyejin Kim ◽  
Ji-Sook Hwang ◽  
Bogman Lee ◽  
Jinpyo Hong ◽  
Soojin Lee
2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Kyungchul Noh ◽  
Jung-Cheol Park ◽  
Jung-Soo Han ◽  
Sung Joong Lee

2001 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 284-284 ◽  
Author(s):  
Terry Elliott

It is suggested that a connection between neurogenesis and brain part size is unsurprising. It is argued that neurogenesis cannot, however, be the only factor contributing to brain size. Highly individual post-natal experience radically shapes individual brains, leading to dramatic increases in brain size. The role of comparatively coarse statistical techniques in addressing these subtle biological issues is questioned.


2019 ◽  
Vol 43 (9) ◽  
pp. 1769-1782 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yeonhee Joo ◽  
Hyejin Kim ◽  
Sungjoong Lee ◽  
Soojin Lee

1977 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 337 ◽  
Author(s):  
R Firn ◽  
J Digby

The rate of elongation of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) hypocotyl sections was found to be dependent on the rate of growth of the outermost cell layers (peripheral cell layers) of that tissue. Hypocotyl sections from which those layers had teen peeled grew but did not show typical geotropic curvature. A model of geotropic curvature is proposed where the differential growth causing curvature is due to a differential rate of elongation between the upper and lower peripheral cell layers of a horizontal shoot. In the model it is speculated that the peripheral cell layers are the site of both geoperception and georesponse. The model does not involve a lateral movement of a growth regulator and experiments with longitudinally bisected hypocotyl sections provided evidence consistent with this model but inconsistent with the Cholodny-Went theory of geotropism.


2014 ◽  
Vol 58 (3) ◽  
pp. 439-465
Author(s):  
Leszek S. Jankiewicz

The evolution of such terms as growth, differentiation, development, morphogenesis etc. is discussed. It is proposed that the term (notion) development should be understood to comprise "growth", "differentiation" and even "abscission, abortion and necrosis". The term "development" is already used in such a way by some authors. The relations among the phenomena denoted by the above terms are presented in a graphic form to show that they partly overlap. The concept that growth and development represent quantitative and qualitative aspects (respectively) of plant augmentation is criticized. The newly introduced terms "development hormone" or "development regulator" seem more suitable than "growth hormone" and "growth regulator", however, these later ones are correct and may be used. The traditional term "phytohormone" and the newly introduced one "phytoregulator" seem convenient, but it must be kept in mind that such substances may transmit information both on a chemical basis as well as on a biophysical one. An example here can be auxin; a change in the wavy character of its transport may serve as information. In some cases a complex of two or more substances may play the role of a hormone, for instance ACC and ethylene, of which one is easily transportable but little active and the other is very active but exerts its action rather locally. Other combinations of activities may exist in other such pairs.


HortScience ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 43 (1) ◽  
pp. 106-111 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donald J. Huber

The discovery of 1-methylcyclopropene (1-MCP) as an inhibitor of ethylene action has provided yet another effective tool for understanding the role of this hormone in the development of higher plants. In the nearly 12 years since the description of the effects of this growth regulator on ethylene action, the subsequent introduction of stable formulations has resulted in an explosive increase in 1-MCP-targeted research, particularly, although not exclusively, in the discipline of postharvest science. The vicinal relationship between 1-MCP and postharvest biology is understandable in view of the established roles of ethylene, both beneficial and detrimental, in the handling and storage behaviors of a vast majority of harvested fruit and vegetative organs. The use of 1-MCP is proving to be supplemental to molecular approaches for identifying and understanding the spectrum of senescence and ripening processes under the direct control of ethylene perception. Climacteric fruits have served as the predominant target for investigations of 1-MCP, and the responses of these fruits have confirmed that the antagonist operates in opposition to ethylene. Studies of nonclimacteric fruits challenged with 1-MCP and other ethylene action inhibitors have identified both ethylene-dependent and ethylene-independent ripening processes and have posed interesting questions regarding the canonical distinctions between climacteric and nonclimacteric fruits.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document