scholarly journals Setting health research priorities using the CHNRI method: VII. A review of the first 50 applications of the CHNRI method

2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Igor Rudan ◽  
Sachiyo Yoshida ◽  
Kit Yee Chan ◽  
Devi Sridhar ◽  
Kerri Wazny ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Research ◽  
Research Priorities

scholarly journals Patients, clinicians and researchers working together to improve cardiovascular health: a qualitative study of barriers and priorities for patient-oriented research

BMJ Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. e031187 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria-Jose Santana ◽  
Sandra Zelinsky ◽  
Sadia Ahmed ◽  
Chelsea Doktorchik ◽  
Matthew James ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Research ◽  
Heart Diseases ◽  
Research Priorities ◽  
Research Programme ◽  
Advisory Council ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Prediction And Prevention ◽  
Participatory Health Research ◽  
Working Together ◽  
Oriented Research

ObjectivesThe overall goal of this study is to identify priorities for cardiovascular (CV) health research that are important to patients and clinician-researchers. We brought together a group of CV patients and clinician-researchers new to patient-oriented research (POR), to build a multidisciplinary POR team and form an advisory committee for the Libin Cardiovascular Institute of Alberta.DesignThis qualitative POR used a participatory health research paradigm to work with participants in eliciting their priorities. Therefore, participants were involved in priority setting, and analysis of findings. Participants also developed a plan for continued engagement to support POR in CV health research.SettingLibin Cardiovascular Institute of Alberta, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Canada.ParticipantsA total of 23 participants, including patients and family caregivers (n=12) and clinician-researchers (n=11).ResultsParticipants identified barriers and facilitators to POR in CV health (lack of awareness of POR and poor understanding on the role of patients) and 10 research priorities for improving CV health. The CV health research priorities include: (1) CV disease prediction and prevention, (2) access to CV care, (3) communication with providers, (4) use of eHealth technology, (5) patient experiences in healthcare, (6) patient engagement, (7) transitions and continuity of CV care, (8) integrated CV care, (9) development of structures for patient-to-patient support and (10) research on rare heart diseases.ConclusionsIn this study, research priorities were identified by patients and clinician-researchers working together to improve CV health. Future research programme and projects will be developed to address these priorities. A key output of this study is the creation of the patient advisory council that will provide support and will work with clinician-researchers to improve CV health.

scholarly journals Setting health research priorities using the CHNRI method: III. Involving stakeholders

2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sachiyo Yoshida ◽  
Kerri Wazny ◽  
Simon Cousens ◽  
Kit Yee Chan
Keyword(s):  
Health Research ◽  
Research Priorities

scholarly journals Public Health Research Priorities to Address US Human Trafficking

2017 ◽  
Vol 107 (7) ◽  
pp. 1045-1047 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emily F. Rothman ◽  
Hanni Stoklosa ◽  
Susie B. Baldwin ◽  
Makini Chisolm-Straker ◽  
Rumi Kato Price ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Human Trafficking ◽  
Health Research ◽  
Research Priorities ◽  
Public Health Research

Health research priorities and gaps in South Asia

BMJ ◽  
2017 ◽  
pp. j1510 ◽  
Author(s):  
Soumya Swaminathan ◽  
Huma Qureshi ◽  
Mahmood Uz Jahan ◽  
Dharma K Baskota ◽  
Sunil De Alwis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
South Asia ◽  
Health Research ◽  
Research Priorities

Supporting sexual and gender minority health: Research priorities from mental health professionals

2019 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 205-221
Author(s):  
Kristen D. Clark ◽  
Matthew R. Capriotti ◽  
Juno Obedin-Maliver ◽  
Mitchell R. Lunn ◽  
Micah E. Lubensky ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Mental Health Professionals ◽  
Health Professionals ◽  
Health Research ◽  
Minority Health ◽  
Research Priorities ◽  
Gender Minority ◽  
Sexual And Gender Minority ◽  
And Gender

scholarly journals Comparing public-health research priorities in Europe

2009 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark McCarthy ◽  
Gabrielle Harvey ◽  
Claudia Conceição ◽  
Giuseppe la Torre ◽  
Gabriel Gulis
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Health Research ◽  
Research Priorities ◽  
Public Health Research

scholarly journals Invited commentary on … Mental health research priorities in low- and middle-income countries

2009 ◽  
Vol 195 (4) ◽  
pp. 364-365 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ricardo Araya
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Health Research ◽  
Research Priorities ◽  
Mental Health Research ◽  
Health Priorities ◽  
Middle Income ◽  
Simple Process ◽  
Inequalities In Health ◽  
Middle Income Countries ◽  
Low And Middle Income

SummaryThere are huge inequalities in health research within and between countries. It is argued that this may hinder the process of setting and tackling mental health priorities. If this were true, establishing research priorities would be important. However, this is not a simple process and one must be aware of its limitations. Despite a plethora of declarations, funding for mental health research in low- and middle-income countries remains hard to find. In the absence of funding, establishing research priorities is seen by many as an exercise of lesser importance.

scholarly journals The National Institute for Health Research Critical Care Research Priority Setting Survey 2018

2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 198-201
Author(s):  
Kate C Tatham ◽  
Daniel F McAuley ◽  
Mark Borthwick ◽  
Neil G Henderson ◽  
Gemma Bashevoy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care ◽  
Translational Research ◽  
Priority Setting ◽  
Health Research ◽  
Allied Health ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Academic Research ◽  
Research Priorities ◽  
Allied Health Professionals ◽  
James Lind Alliance

Introduction Defining research priorities in intensive care is key to determining appropriate allocation of funding. Several topics were identified from the 2014 James Lind Alliance priority setting exercise conducted with the Intensive Care Society. The James Lind Alliance process included significant (and vital) patient/public contribution, but excluded professionals without a bedside role. As a result it may have failed to identify potential early-stage translational research topics, which are more likely identified by medical and/or academic members of relevant specialist basic science groups. The objective of the present project was to complement the James Lind Alliance project by generating an updated list of research priorities by facilitating academic research input. Method A survey was conducted by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) to identify the key research priorities from intensive care clinicians, including allied health professionals and academics, along with any evolving themes arising from translational research. Feasibility of all identified topics were then discussed and allocated to themes by a joint clinical academics/NIHR focus group. Results The survey was completed by 94 intensive care clinicians (including subspecialists), academics and allied health professions. In total, 203 research questions were identified, with the top five themes focusing on: appropriate case selection (e.g. who and when to treat; 24%), ventilation (7%), sepsis (6%), delirium (5%) and rehabilitation (5%). Discussion Utilising a methodology distinct from that employed by the James Lind Alliance process, from a broad spectrum of intensive care clinicians/scientists, enabled identification of a variety of priority research areas. These topics can now inform not only the investigator-led research agenda, but will also be considered in due course by the NIHR for potential future funding calls.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document