scholarly journals Introduction and Removal of Disinfection Byproducts and Mutagenic Activity by Chemical and Photolytic Treatments

2005 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 387-401 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Backlund

Samples from four different raw water sources were treated with various disinfectants and subjected to chemical analyses and mutagenicity assays. The following disinfectants were used: chlorine (Cl2), chlorine dioxide (ClO2), monochloramine (NH2Cl), ozone (O3), ultraviolet radiation (UV), and combinations of Cl2/ClO2, O3/Cl2, UV/Cl2, and UV/O3/Cl2. The samples were analysed for adsorbable organic halogens (AOX), chloroform (CHCl3), carboxylic acids, volatile organics, chlorite, the strong mutagen 3-chloro-4 (dichloromethyl)-5-hydroxy-2 (5H)-furanone (MX), and mutagenic activity (as detected by the Ames test). Humic lake water which had been treated with the combination UV/Cl2 exhibited a higher level of mutagenicity and higher concentrations of MX and CHCl3 than water treated with Cl2 alone. The same observation was made for the mutagenicity and the CHCl3 concentration in waters preoxidized with low doses of O3 and UV/O3, respectively. When higher doses of these powerful oxidants were used in the pretreatment step, the level of mutagenicity, MX and CHCI3 were lower than in water chlorinated without pretreatment. The combination UV/O3 was found to be more efficient than O3 alone in destroying the precursor material to the mutagenic compounds and chloroform. The higher the proportion of ClO2 in the combined Cl2/ClO2 process, the lower the levels of mutagenicity, MX, CHCl3, and AOX. The production of inorganic chlorite increased with a higher proportion of ClO2. Aldehydes, n-alkanes, and low molecular-weight carboxylic acids were identified as byproducts following UV treatment of humic lake water. The mutagenic activity (per amount of DOC) was approximately similar after chlorination of humic rich surface- and ground waters as after chlorination of waters from the rivers Meuse and Rhine, containing relatively low amounts of humic matter. The precursors to MX were found to be more abundant in the humic waters than in the river waters.

Author(s):  
U. Münster ◽  
E. Heikkinen ◽  
K. Salonen ◽  
H. De Haan

2005 ◽  
Vol 75 (3) ◽  
pp. 393-407 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kelly O. Maloney ◽  
Donald P. Morris ◽  
Carl O. Moses ◽  
Christopher L. Osburn

1982 ◽  
Vol 16 (6) ◽  
pp. 1047-1050 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. De Haan ◽  
T. De Boer ◽  
H.A. Kramer ◽  
J. Voerman

2002 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 199-204 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Monarca ◽  
D. Feretti ◽  
I. Zerbini ◽  
C. Zani ◽  
A. Alberti ◽  
...  

The aim of this research was to study at a pilot plant the influence of peracetic acid (PAA) on the formation of mutagenic compounds in river waters used for human consumption. The results obtained using PAA were compared to those for the most commonly used disinfectant, sodium hypochlorite (NaClO). Ames test and three genotoxicity plant tests, Allium tests and Tradescantia/micronuclei (TRAD/MCN) test, were used to evaluate the mutagenic activity of disinfected water samples. Chemical analysis, using gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS), was also performed to identify disinfection by-products (DBPs). A slight bacterial mutagenicity was found in raw river water and similar activity was detected in disinfected water samples. Plant tests gave genotoxicity only for raw river water. DBPs identified in PAA-treated water included carboxylic acids, a few non-halogenated alcohols and carbonyl-containing compounds, whereas some potentially mutagenic halogenated by-products were found in NaClO-treated samples. Although PAA appears to be promising for water potabilization, these results must be confirmed with different source waters and with higher concentrations of PAA.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document