Trochanteric pain in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty: A protocol for a systematic review

Background: Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is one of the most common surgical procedures. Although THA surgeries are typically very successful, between 3% and 17% of all patients experience trochanteric pain after surgery. Unfortunately, there remains little high quality and reproducible evidence surrounding this disorder, especially following total hip replacement. The objectives of this review are to describe, among pre-operative or post-operative primary THA patients the prevalence, treatments, prognosis, risk factors, and diagnostic methods available for trochanteric pain. Methods: This is a protocol for a descriptive systematic review of trochanteric pain among THA patients. We will include studies of all study designs, with the exception of non-systematic reviews and expert opinion, with no date limits. We will search Medline, Embase, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Library using the Ovid search interface. We will also search the reference lists of included studies for possible missed studies. We will use the systematic review management software Rayyan to assist with study screening. Two reviewers will independently review studies for inclusion and extract data into a study-specific database. Discussion: This study will add to the literature by comprehensively and systematically evaluating the available literature on trochanteric pain after THA. Previous studies have been conducted on the topic but they were not comprehensive or did not review the literature systematically. Additionally, our study will critically evaluate the methodological quality of the included studies, adding an evidence-based component to the review. This review will help orthopaedic surgeons better care for patients with trochanteric pain after THA, and will identify knowledge gaps for future research. Registration: This protocol will be registered on PROSPERO

Download Full-text

Trochanteric pain in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty: A protocol for a systematic review

10.7287/peerj.preprints.27293v1 ◽

2018 ◽

Author(s):

Daniel Axelrod ◽

Kim Madden ◽

Laura Banfield ◽

Mitchell Winemaker ◽

Justin deBeer ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽

Hip Arthroplasty ◽

Diagnostic Methods ◽

Cochrane Library ◽

Future Research ◽

Total Hip ◽

Review Management ◽

The Cochrane Library ◽

Study Designs

Download Full-text

Outcomes of total hip arthroplasty using dualmobility cups for femoral neck fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Hip International ◽

10.1177/1120700020926652 ◽

2020 ◽

pp. 112070002092665

Author(s):

Syed H Mufarrih ◽

Nada Q Qureshi ◽

Bassam Masri ◽

Shahryar Noordin

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽

Femoral Neck ◽

Hip Arthroplasty ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Mortality Rates ◽

Femoral Neck Fractures ◽

Cochrane Library ◽

Total Hip ◽

The Mean

Objectives: Femoral neck fractures (FNFs), with up to 15% mortality, are prominent orthopaedic emergencies. After treating FNFs, dislocation is another challenge increasing morbidity, mortality and treatment costs substantially. The emerging dual-mobility cup (DMC) may decrease dislocation rates following total hip arthroplasty (THA) for FNFs. We performed a systematic review of literature reporting dislocation and mortality rates with DMC-THA for the treatment of FNFs. Methods: 2 authors independently searched PubMed (MEDLINE), Google Scholar and Cochrane library for studies reporting dislocation and mortality rates for FNFs treated with DMC-THA since inception up to January 2019. Data on outcomes of interest was extracted from all studies and assessed for eligibility for a meta-analysis. Results: Out of 522 search results, 18 studies were included in the systematic review and 4 in the meta-analysis. The mean rate of dislocation following DMC-THA for FNFs was found to be 1.87% ± 2.11, with a 1-year mortality rate of 14.0% ± 10.55. Results of meta-analysis showed that dislocation and 1-year postoperative mortality rates were significantly lower for DMC-THA with a risk ratio 0.31 (95% CI, 0.16–0.59; I2 = 0%, p = 0.0003) and 0.55 (0.40, 0.77; I2 = 0%, p = 0.003) respectively when compared to biploar hemiathroplasty (BHA). Conclusions: The mean dislocation and mortality rates in DMC-THA are lower than previously reported rates for THA with single cup and comparable to unipolar and bipolar hemiarthroplasty. Further research involving randomised control trials to assess differences in outcomes, longevity and cost-effectiveness needs to be conducted to make recommendations for the use of DMC in treating FNFs.

Download Full-text

Time for return to sport following total hip arthroplasty: a meta-analysis

Hip International ◽

10.1177/11207000211041975 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 112070002110419

Author(s):

Ahmed A Magan ◽

Ganan T Radhakrishnan ◽

Babar Kayani ◽

Flaminia Ronca ◽

Vikas Khanduja ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽

Hip Arthroplasty ◽

English Language ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Return To Sport ◽

Pooled Analysis ◽

Cochrane Library ◽

Total Hip ◽

Patient Demographics ◽

The Cochrane Library

Introduction: Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) is being increasingly undertaken in younger and more active patients, with many of these patients wanting to return to sport (RTS) after surgery. However, the percentage of patients RTS and time at which they are able to get back to sport following surgery remains unknown. The objective of this meta-analysis was to determine the time patients RTS after THA. Methods: A search was performed on PUBMED, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library for trials on THA and RTS, in the English language, published from the inception of the database to October 2020. All clinical trials reporting on to RTS following THA were included. Data relating to patient demographics, methodological quality, RTS, clinical outcomes and complications were recorded. The PRISMA guidelines were used to undertake this study. Results: The initial literature search identified 1720 studies. Of these, 11 studies with 2297 patients matched the inclusion criteria. 3 studies with 154 patients demonstrated an overall pooled proportion of 40.0% (95% CI, 32.5–47.9%) of patients RTS between 2 and 3 months after surgery. 4 studies with 242 patients demonstrated an overall pooled proportion of 76.9% (95% CI, 71.5–82.0) of patients RTS by 6 months after surgery. Pooled proportion analysis from 7 trials with 560 patients demonstrated 93.9% (95% CI, 82.7–99.5%) of patients RTS between 6 and 12 months after surgery. Conclusions: Pooled proportion analysis showed increasingly more patients were able to RTS after THA over the first 1 year after surgery. There remains marked inter and intra-study variations in time for RTS but the pooled analysis shows that over 90% of patients were able to RTS at 6–12 months after THA. These finding will enable more informed discussions between patients and healthcare professionals about time for RTS following THA.

Download Full-text

Diagnosis, Rehabilitation and Preventive Strategies for Pudendal Neuropathy in Cyclists, A Systematic Review

Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology ◽

10.3390/jfmk6020042 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 6 (2) ◽

pp. 42

Author(s):

Rita Chiaramonte ◽

Piero Pavone ◽

Michele Vecchio

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Therapeutic Strategies ◽

Diagnostic Methods ◽

Cochrane Library ◽

Future Research ◽

Pudendal Neuropathy ◽

Preventive Strategies ◽

Therapeutic Approaches ◽

Therapeutic Protocol ◽

The Cochrane Library

This systematic review aims to provide an overview of the diagnostic methods, preventive strategies, and therapeutic approaches for cyclists suffering from pudendal neuropathy. The study defines a guide in delineating a diagnostic and therapeutic protocol using the best current strategies. Pubmed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and Scopus Web of Science were searched for the terms: “Bicycling” OR “Bike” OR “Cyclists” AND “Neuropathy” OR “Pudendal Nerve” OR “Pudendal Neuralgia” OR “Perineum”. The database search identified 14,602 articles. After the titles and abstracts were screened, two independent reviewers analyzed 41 full texts. A total of 15 articles were considered eligible for inclusion. Methodology and results of the study were critically appraised in conformity with PRISMA guidelines and PICOS criteria. Fifteen articles were included in the systematic review and were used to describe the main methods used for measuring the severity of pudendal neuropathy and the preventive and therapeutic strategies for nerve impairment. Future research should determine the validity and the effectiveness of diagnostic and therapeutic strategies, their cost-effectiveness, and the adherences of the sportsmen to the treatment.

Download Full-text

Ten-year survival of ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty in patients younger than 60 years: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research ◽

10.1186/s13018-021-02828-1 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 16 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Ihab Ibraheam El-Desouky ◽

Albaraa Hassan Helal ◽

Ali Mohamed Reda Mansour

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽

Aseptic Loosening ◽

Hip Arthroplasty ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Cochrane Library ◽

Fracture Rate ◽

Level Of Evidence ◽

Total Hip ◽

Ceramic On Ceramic

Abstract Background Total hip arthroplasty (THA) with ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC) was created to minimise wear debris and aseptic loosening. A decade ago, a meta-analysis showed a 10-year survival rate of just 89%. Based on the excellent tribology of the current CoC, significant improvement of implant survivorship is expected. In patients younger than 60, we conducted a meta-analysis to assess 10-year survival and complications after using current primary CoC THA. Materials and methods PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, Virtual Health Library, and Cochrane Library were used to scan for published trials that met the inclusion criteria until January 2019. The qualified studies were subjected to a systematic review and proportional analysis, and the randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were included in a comparison meta-analysis. Results Thirteen studies were included 156 findings. The total number of hips was 2278. Nine studies were cohort, and four were RCTs between ceramic and polyethylene cups. The analysis revealed an average age of 44 years (range 24–54). The 10-year survival 96% (95% CI; 95.4–96.8%), aseptic loosening rate 0.516. (95% CI; 0.265–0.903), ceramic fracture rate 0.620 (95% CI; 0.34–1.034) and squeaking rate 2.687 (95% CI; 1.279–4.593). A comparison meta-analysis revealed the risk ratio (RR) for revision was 0.27 (95% CI; 0.15–0.47), and for aseptic loosening 0.15 (0.03–0.70) favouring CoC, while RR for component fracture was 1.62 (95% CI; 0.27–9.66) favouring the polyethylene. Conclusion In patients under sixty, current CoC THAs are correlated with better 10-year outcomes than before and have high survivorship rates. Level of evidence: Level I.

Download Full-text

Robotic-assisted compared with conventional total hip arthroplasty: systematic review and meta-analysis

Postgraduate Medical Journal ◽

10.1136/postgradmedj-2017-135352 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 94 (1112) ◽

pp. 335.1-341 ◽

Cited By ~ 17

Author(s):

Xi Chen ◽

Jianping Xiong ◽

Peipei Wang ◽

Shibai Zhu ◽

Wenting Qi ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽

Hip Arthroplasty ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Cochrane Library ◽

Complication Rates ◽

Safety And Efficacy ◽

Robotic Assisted ◽

Total Hip

BackgroundRobotic-assisted total hip arthroplasty (THA) allows for accurate preoperative planning and component positioning, potentially enhancing implant survival and long-term outcomes. The relative efficacy and safety of robotic-assisted and conventional THA, however, are unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis compared the safety and efficacy of robotic-assisted and conventional THA.MethodsMedline, Embase and the Cochrane Library were comprehensively searched in September 2017 to identify studies comparing the safety and efficacy of robotic-assisted and conventional THA. Seven studies were included. Data of interest were extracted and analysed using Review Manager 5.3.ResultsThe seven included studies involved 1516 patients, with 522 undergoing robotic-assisted and 994 undergoing conventional THA. Compared with conventional THA, robotic-assisted THA was associated with longer surgical time (not significant); lower intraoperative complication rates (OR: 0.12, 95% CI: 0.05 to 0.34, p<0.0001 I2); better cup placement, stem placement and global offset and a higher rate of heterotopic ossifications. Functional scores, limb length discrepancy and rates of revision and stress shielding were similar in the two groups. The relative amount of blood loss was unclear.ConclusionThe results of this meta-analysis suggest that robotic-assisted THA has certain advantages over conventional THA, including the results of component positioning and rates of intraoperative complications. Additional comparative studies are required to determine the long-term clinical outcomes of robotic-assisted THA.

Download Full-text

Efficacy of NSAIDs versus radiotherapy for heterotopic ossification prophylaxis following total hip arthroplasty in high-risk patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Hip International ◽

10.1177/1120700021991115 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 112070002199111

Author(s):

Jacob Shapira ◽

Mitchell J Yelton ◽

Jeffery W Chen ◽

Philip J Rosinsky ◽

David R Maldonado ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

High Risk ◽

Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽

Hip Arthroplasty ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Comparable Efficacy ◽

Total Hip ◽

High Risk Patients ◽

Randomised Control Trials ◽

Risk Patients

Background: The aims of this systematic review were: (1) to investigate the prophylactic effect of radiotherapy (RT) and NSAIDs in high-risk patients following total hip arthroplasty (THA); and (2) to compare the efficacy of non-selective and COX-II selective NSAIDs in preventing post-THA HO, utilising a meta-analysis of randomised control studies. Methods: The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Databases were searched for articles regarding HO following THA in March 2019. Studies were included if they contained data regarding HO incidence after THA or contained data regarding HO prophylaxis comparison of NSAIDs and/or RT in terms of dosage or duration. Results: 24 studies reported on populations that were not at high-risk for HO. These studies reported between 47.3% and 90.4% of their patient populations had no HO formation; between 2.8% and 52.7% had mild formation; and between 0.0% and 10.4% had severe formation. A total of 13 studies reported on populations at high-risk for HO. Studies analysing RT in high-risk patients reported between 28.6% and 97.4% of patients developed no HO formation; between 1.9% and 66.7% developed mild HO formation; and between 0.0% and 11.9% developed severe HO formation. Studies analysing NSAID treatment among high-risk populations reported between 76.6% and 88.9% had no HO formation; between 11.1% and 23.4% had mild HO formation, and between 0.0% and 1.8% had severe HO formation. 9 studies were identified as randomised control trials and subsequently used for meta-analysis. The relative risk for COX-II in developing any HO after THA was not significantly different compared to non-selective NSAIDs (RR 1.00; CI, 0.801–1.256; p = 0.489). Conclusions: NSAIDs prophylaxis for HO may have better efficacy than RT in high-risk patients following THA. Non-selective and COX-II selective NSAIDs have comparable efficacy in preventing HO. Factors such as medical comorbidities and side-effect profile should dictate the prophylaxis recommendation.

Download Full-text