Introduction: On the Future of Academic Freedom

2019 ◽  
pp. 1-14
Keyword(s):  
Academic Freedom ◽  
The Future

The Future of Academic Freedom

Academe ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 83 (4) ◽  
pp. 45
Author(s):  
Richard T. De George ◽  
Louis Menand ◽  
Robert M. O'Neil
Keyword(s):  
Academic Freedom ◽  
The Future

Institutions of the “Yes”

2019 ◽  
pp. 51-73
Author(s):  
Dawne McCance
Keyword(s):  
Academic Freedom ◽  
Educational Institutions ◽  
The Future ◽  
Ecce Homo

Derrida returns to the questions of academic freedom, teaching as auto-reproduction, and the biological-biographical body by considering Nietzsche’s Ecce Homo before turning to his earlier (1872) On the Future of our Educational Institutions. Central to this chapter is Derrida’s inheritance of Nietzsche’s autograph-signature.

Are Chinese Universities Globally Competitive?

2013 ◽  
Vol 215 ◽  
pp. 727-743 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathryn Mohrman
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Academic Freedom ◽  
Research Output ◽  
The United States ◽  
Chinese Universities ◽  
The Future ◽  
International Standing

AbstractThis article compares five leading Chinese universities with 16 other research-intensive institutions in Asia, Europe and the United States. All the universities demonstrate an increasing commitment to research, although the fastest growth between 2003 and 2007 occurred in Asian institutions. Beijing and Qinghua universities compare favourably in terms of funding, but their research output is not as highly regarded. Despite concerns about academic freedom, the international standing of at least some Chinese universities is likely to rise in the future.

8. Academic Freedom: The Future of a Confusion

1975 ◽  
pp. 111-124
Author(s):  
Richard Schmitt
Keyword(s):  
Academic Freedom ◽  
The Future

Academic Freedom and the Standards of Behavior

2007 ◽  
pp. 80-93 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ya. Kouzminov ◽  
M. Yudkevich
Keyword(s):  
Academic Freedom ◽  
Dynamic Model ◽  
Future Development ◽  
Educational System ◽  
Empirical Data ◽  
University Management ◽  
Current State ◽  
The Future ◽  
The Relationship

The article analyzes the activity of university lecturer and researcher and the need for special mechanisms providing its efficiency. The authors consider academic freedom as a parameter of the university’s environment and discuss the convention regulating the relationship between lecturers and university management. The factors of the destruction of this convention are analyzed. The dynamic model of the lecturers’ behavior is proposed and two scenarios for the future development ("teaching ratchet" and "academic ratchet") as well as the factors of choice between them are discussed. The empirical data on the development and current state of the Russian educational system is also taken into account.

scholarly journals Protecting Academic Freedom: Using the Past to Chart a Path Toward the Future

2018 ◽  
Vol 58 (3) ◽  
pp. 420-422
Author(s):  
Joy Ann Williamson-Lott
Keyword(s):  
Academic Freedom ◽  
The Past ◽  
The Future

scholarly journals Protecting Research Confidentiality via the Wigmore Criteria: Some Implications of Parent and Bruckert v The Queen and Luka Rocco Magnotta

2016 ◽  
Vol 31 (03) ◽  
pp. 473-493 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ted Palys ◽  
David MacAlister
Keyword(s):  
Research Ethics ◽  
Academic Freedom ◽  
Research Participants ◽  
Legal Challenges ◽  
The Future ◽  
Research Ethics Boards ◽  
Search Warrant

Abstract There have been two significant legal challenges to research confidentiality in Canada. The first occurred because of a Coroner’s subpoena, with the researcher invoking the Wigmore criteria and winning a researcher-participant privilege. A second case saw two University of Ottawa researchers served with a search warrant for the tape and transcript of an interview they had conducted years earlier with an individual subsequently accused of murder. The researchers defended research confidentiality in Quebec Superior Court, winning a qualified researcher-participant privilege in the process. This article discusses implications of the court’s decision for researchers, research ethics boards, and universities for the future defence of research confidences. All have a role to play in designing research that anticipates the court’s evidentiary requirements when a claim of privilege is invoked to help ensure future jurisprudence is as favourable to research participants and as respectful of academic freedom as possible.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document