Spinal morphine anesthesia and urinary retention

1993 ◽  
Vol 83 (11) ◽  
pp. 607-614 ◽  
Author(s):  
KT Mahan ◽  
J Wang

Spinal anesthetic is a common form of surgical anesthetic used in foot and ankle surgery. Spinal morphine anesthetic is less common, but has the advantage of providing postoperative analgesia for 12 to 24 hr. A number of complications can occur with spinal anesthesia, including urinary retention that may be a source of severe and often prolonged discomfort and pain for the patient. Management of this problem may require repeated bladder catheterization, which may lead to urinary tract infections or impairment of urethrovesicular function. This study reviews the incidence of urinary retention in 80 patients (40 after general anesthesia and 40 after spinal anesthesia) who underwent foot and ankle surgery at Saint Joseph's Hospital, Philadelphia, PA. Twenty-five percent of the patients who had spinal anesthesia experienced urinary retention, while only 7 1/2% of the group who had general anesthesia had this complication. Predisposing factors, treatment regimen, and recommendations for the prevention and management of urinary retention are presented.

2006 ◽  
Vol 27 (9) ◽  
pp. 667-671 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark J. Herr ◽  
Ario B. Keyarash ◽  
Jesse J. Muir ◽  
Todd A. Kile ◽  
Richard J. Claridge

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 2473011418S0042
Author(s):  
Ashish Shah ◽  
Samuel Huntley ◽  
Harshadkumar Patel ◽  
Sameer Naranje ◽  
Sung Lee ◽  
...  

Category: Ankle Introduction/Purpose: With increasing implementation of the bundled payment model and meteoric rise in healthcare prices over the past decade, efforts to minimize unnecessary costs are highly warranted. One potential method to do this is by performing foot and ankle surgery on patients either in an appropriate inpatient or outpatient setting. There is evidence suggesting that outpatient orthopaedic foot and ankle surgery for ankle fractures leads to lower risk of 30-day medical morbidities, reoperation, and admissions as compared to inpatient surgeries. The purpose of this study is to compare the inpatient versus outpatient outcomes of patients undergoing elective orthopaedic foot and ankle surgery using a large national database. Methods: Data from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) years 2005-2015 were used in this study. There were 216 CPT codes specific to orthopaedic foot and ankle surgery queried for inclusion in the analysis, 36 of which were identified in the database. CPT codes representing ORIF of ankle fractures were excluded. These codes were manually reviewed by a licensed orthopaedic foot and ankle surgeon to confirm their elective nature, reducing the number of codes to 30. Demographic, comorbidity, and outcome variables were calculated and stratified by inpatient versus outpatient status. Significant differences in these variables were evaluated using ANOVA for continuous variables and Pearson’s Chi-Square for categorical variables. There was a total of 7,672 cases identified. Results: The most common elective inpatient procedures were transmetatarsal amputation (57.9%), total ankle arthroplasty (13.0%), and midtarsal amputation (5.2%). The most common elective outpatient procedures were collateral ligamentous repair (15.8%), transmetatarsal amputation (10.7%), and extensor tendon repair (8.7%). As compared to patients receiving outpatient treatment, patients who received inpatient treatment for elective foot and ankle surgeries were significantly older, male, had lower BMI, and were more likely to smoke. Inpatients were also more likely to receive general anesthesia, have shorter operative times, and have functional limitations (p<0.05). Inpatients were more likely to suffer from various complications, including surgical site infection, pneumonia, unplanned intubation, renal insufficiency, acute renal failure, urinary tract infections, myocardial infarction, cardiac arrest, stroke, transfusions, sepsis, and reoperation (p<0.05). Conclusion: Our results show that outpatient procedures for elective foot and ankle surgery were significantly safer than inpatient procedures in regard to complication profiles. However, the inpatients who received surgery were significantly older than the outpatients, which may explain the described findings. Additional advanced regression modeling is currently underway to examine the multivariable associations between inpatient status and total hospital costs.


2019 ◽  
Vol 85 (10) ◽  
pp. 1099-1103
Author(s):  
Nikhil Crain ◽  
Talar Tejirian

Foley catheters (FCs) are often used during inguinal hernia operations; however, the impact of intraoperative FC use on postoperative urinary retention (POUR) is not well understood. We reviewed unplanned returns to the urgent care or ED for 27,012 inguinal hernia operations across 15 Southern California Kaiser Permanente medical centers over 6.5 years. In total, 239 (0.88%) patients returned to urgent care/ED with POUR [235 (98%) men versus 4 (2%) women]. Overall, POUR increased with age ( P < 0.00001). POUR was higher in open repairs using general anesthesia versus local with monitored anesthesia care (0.7% vs 0.3%, P < 0.0001). Of 5,017 laparoscopic operations, 28 per cent had FC use. Although POUR was greater for laparoscopic versus open operations (2.21 vs 0.58%, P < 0.00001), there was no difference in POUR for intraoperative FC versus no FC use in the laparoscopic approach (2.36% vs 2.15%, P = 0.33). For all laparoscopic operations, there was no difference in urinary tract infection within 7 or 30 days when comparing intra-operative FC versus no FC use ( P = 0.28). POUR can be minimized by avoiding general anesthesia for open inguinal hernia repairs, but intraoperative FC use does not affect POUR or urinary tract infection rates for laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair.


2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jordan Crabtree ◽  
Troy Marke

Background and Hypothesis: Pectus excavatum and carinatum are sternal deformities that often require surgeries with significant postoperative pain that can limit a patient’s ability to void. An indwelling urinary catheter is placed for the operation, but is often removed on the first postoperative day due to concerns of infection, which begs the necessity of these catheters in the first place. In this study, we hypothesized that there would be no increased risk of urinary retention or urinary tract infection irrespective of whether urinary catheters were utilized. Experimental Design: A pre/post quality improvement study was undertaken of patients undergoing pectus excavatum/carinatum repair between June 1, 2015 and May 31, 2022. The pre intervention group spanned from June 1, 2015 to May 31, 2021, where Foley catheters were placed intraoperatively and removed the first postoperative day. Pediatric surgery and anesthesia groups changed practice effective June 1, 2021 and decided to no longer utilize urinary catheters in pectus repairs. Pre-intervention patients were acquired through the surgery billing database. Post-intervention patients were acquired prospectively. Rates of urinary retention (any event requiring mechanical intervention for voiding) and urinary tract infections (UTI, >100,000 CFU bacteria/mL urine) were compiled into REDCap. Data are expressed as percent of the total cohort. Results:  Of 179 patients undergoing pectus repair (162 Excavatum, 17 Carinatum), 12 patients (6.7%) in the pre-intervention group experienced urinary retention. Of these, 9 received in/out catheterization, 1 had a Foley catheter replaced, and 2 underwent in/out catheterization and had a Foley replaced. There were no urinary tract infections recorded among the pre-intervention group. Conclusion and Potential Impacts: Urinary retention and UTI are rare in patients who have an indwelling urinary catheter. Data acquired over the next year from the post-intervention group will help determine the true necessity for these catheters in the perioperative pectus population. 


2012 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 154 ◽  
Author(s):  
SherylS Justice ◽  
DennisJ Horvath ◽  
Birong Li ◽  
ShareefM Dabdoub ◽  
BrianA VanderBrink

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document