scholarly journals Modest dose anti-thymocyte globulin administered intraoperatively is safe and effective in kidney transplantations: a retrospective study

PeerJ ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. e7274 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hui-Ying Liu ◽  
Yuan-Tso Cheng ◽  
Hao Lun Luo ◽  
Chiang-Chi Huang ◽  
Chien Hsu Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Rejection ◽  
Induction Therapy ◽  
Dose Regimen ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Graft Loss ◽  
Graft Function ◽  
Calcineurin Inhibitors ◽  
Kidney Transplant Recipients ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Kidney Transplantations

Background Anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) as induction therapy in renal transplantation is facing the dilemma of reducing the incidence of acute rejection (AR) and delayed graft function (DGF) or increasing risks of infection and malignancy. The purpose of this study was to delineate the safety and efficiency of the optimal ATG dosage. Methods We retrospectively evaluated 91 deceased donor kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) in our institution between March 2011 and January 2019. The patients were classified into three groups based on induction therapy: (1) Group 1: modest-dose ATG (three mg/kg) intraoperatively (N = 21); (2) Group 2: low-dose ATG (1–1.5 mg/kg) intraoperatively (N = 23); (3) Group 3: basiliximab 20 mg both on day 0 and 4 (N = 47). In Groups 1 and 2, all patients received a daily low-dose program (1–1.5 mg/kg each day) with target dosage of six mg/kg. Induction therapy was combined with standard immunosuppressive regimen consisting of calcineurin inhibitors, mycophenolate/the mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors and corticosteroids. Results There was no significant difference in patient characteristics among groups. The outcomes of infection rate, biopsy-proven acute rejection, post-transplant diabetes mellitus, graft survival, and patient survival were similar among groups. Compared to the daily low-dose ATG regimen, the intraoperative modest-dose regimen did not cause more dose interruption and hence was more likely to reach the target ATG dosage. The intraoperative modest-dose regimen also seemed to reduce the rate of DGF. Discussion In recent years, a trend of using a “lower” dose of ATG has seemed to emerge. Our results suggest intraoperative modest-dose ATG followed by daily low-dose ATG regimen was safe and effective in cadaveric renal transplantations for preventing DGF, AR, and graft loss.

Immunosuppressive Management of Pediatric Kidney Transplant Recipients

2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (28) ◽  
pp. 3451-3459
Author(s):  
Tomáš Seeman
Keyword(s):  
Immunosuppressive Therapy ◽  
Kidney Transplant ◽  
Induction Therapy ◽  
Graft Loss ◽  
Calcineurin Inhibitors ◽  
Mtor Inhibitors ◽  
Therapeutic Drug ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Transplant Recipients ◽  
Kidney Transplant Recipients

: Kidney transplantation is a preferable treatment of children with end-stage kidney disease. All kidney transplant recipients, including pediatric need immunosuppressive medications to prevent rejection episodes and graft loss. : Induction therapy is used temporarily only immediately following transplantation while maintenance immunosuppressive drugs are started and given long-term. There is currently no consensus regarding the use of induction therapy in children; its use should be decided based on the immunological risk of the child. : The recent progress shows that the recommended strategy is to use as maintenance immunosuppressive therapy a combination of a calcineurin inhibitor (preferably tacrolimus) with an antiproliferative drug (preferably mycophenolate mofetil) with steroids that can be withdrawn early or late in low-risk children. The mTOR-inhibitors (sirolimus, everolimus) are used rarely in pediatrics because of common side effects and no evidence of a benefit over calcineurin inhibitors. The use of calcineurin inhibitors, mycophenolate, and mTOR-inhibitors should be followed by therapeutic drug monitoring. : Immunosuppressive therapy of acute rejection consists of high-dose steroids and/or anti-lymphocyte antibodies (T-cell mediated rejection) or plasma exchange, intravenous immunoglobulines and/or rituximab (antibodymediated rejection). : The future strategies for research are mainly precise characterisation of children needing induction therapy, more specific indications for mTOR-inhibitors and for the far future, the possibility to reach the immuno tolerance.

scholarly journals Long-Term Outcomes after Acute Rejection in Kidney Transplant Recipients: An ANZDATA Analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 30 (9) ◽  
pp. 1697-1707 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philip A. Clayton ◽  
Stephen P. McDonald ◽  
Graeme R. Russ ◽  
Steven J. Chadban
Keyword(s):  
Cardiovascular Disease ◽  
Acute Rejection ◽  
Kidney Transplant ◽  
Graft Loss ◽  
Graft Function ◽  
High Rate ◽  
Sensitivity Analyses ◽  
Transplant Recipients ◽  
Kidney Transplant Recipients

BackgroundDeclining rates of acute rejection (AR) and the high rate of 1-year graft survival among patients with AR have prompted re-examination of AR as an outcome in the clinic and in trials. Yet AR and its treatment may directly or indirectly affect longer-term outcomes for kidney transplant recipients.MethodsTo understand the long-term effect of AR on outcomes, we analyzed data from the Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry, including 13,614 recipients of a primary kidney-only transplant between 1997 and 2017 with at least 6 months of graft function. The associations between AR within 6 months post-transplant and subsequent cause-specific graft loss and death were determined using Cox models adjusted for baseline donor, recipient, and transplant characteristics.ResultsAR occurred in 2906 recipients (21.4%) and was associated with graft loss attributed to chronic allograft nephropathy (hazard ratio [HR], 1.39; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.23 to 1.56) and recurrent AR beyond month 6 (HR, 1.85; 95% CI, 1.39 to 2.46). Early AR was also associated with death with a functioning graft (HR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.08 to 1.36), and with death due to cardiovascular disease (HR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.11 to 1.53) and cancer (HR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.12 to 1.64). Sensitivity analyses restricted to subgroups with either biopsy-proven, antibody-mediated, or vascular rejection, or stratified by treatment response produced similar results.ConclusionsAR is associated with increased risks of longer-term graft failure and death, particularly death from cardiovascular disease and cancer. The results suggest AR remains an important short-term outcome to monitor in kidney transplantation and clinical trials.

scholarly journals The influence of the antithymocyte globulin dose on clinical outcomes of patients undergoing kidney retransplantation

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (5) ◽  
pp. e0251384
Author(s):  
Kamilla Linhares ◽  
Julia Bernardi Taddeo ◽  
Marina Pontello Cristelli ◽  
Henrique Proença ◽  
Klaus Nunes Ficher ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Rejection ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Induction Therapy ◽  
Antithymocyte Globulin ◽  
Cohort Analysis ◽  
Graft Loss ◽  
Graft Function ◽  
Complement Dependent Cytotoxicity ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Estimate Glomerular Filtration Rate

Optimizing antithymocyte globulin (rATG) dosage is critical for high immunological risk patients undergoing a repeat kidney transplant. This natural retrospective cohort study compared clinical outcomes of two successive cohorts of consecutive recipients of retransplants receiving 5 x 1 mg/kg (rATG-5, n = 100) or a single 3 mg/kg (rATG-3, n = 110) dose of rATG induction therapy. All patients had negative complement-dependent cytotoxicity crossmatch and no anti-HLA A, B, DR donor-specific antibodies (DSA). The primary endpoint was efficacy failure (first biopsy-proven acute rejection, graft loss, or death) at 12 months. There was no difference in the cumulative incidence of efficacy failure (18.0% vs. 21.8%, HR = 1.22, 95% CI 0.66–2.25), respectively. There were no differences in 3-years freedom from biopsy proven acute rejection, and patient, graft, and death-censored graft survivals. There were no differences in the incidence of surgical complications (25.0% vs. 18.2%; p 0.151), early hospital readmission (27.8% vs. 29.5%; p = 0.877) and CMV infections (49% vs. 40%; p = 0.190). There were also no differences in the incidence (59.6% vs. 58.7%, p = 0.897) and duration of delayed graft function but a stable difference in estimate glomerular filtration rate was observed from month 1 (54.7±28.8 vs. 44.1±25.3 ml/min/1.73 m2, p = 0.005) to month 36 (51.1±27.7 vs. 42.5±24.5, p = 0.019). Mean urinary protein concentration (month 36: 0.38±0.81 vs. 0.70±2.40 g/ml, p = 0.008) and mean chronic glomerular Banff score in for cause biopsies (months 4–36: 0.0±0.0 vs. 0.04±0.26, p = 0.044) were higher in the rATG-3 group. This cohort analysis did not detect differences in the incidence of efficacy failure and in safety outcomes at 12 months among recipients of kidney retransplants without A, B, and DR DSA, receiving induction therapy with a single 3 mg/kg rATG dose or the traditional 5 mg/kg rATG.

MO941CLINICAL OUTCOMES IN KIDNEY RE-TRANSPLANTATION

2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Clara Pardinhas ◽  
Rita Leal ◽  
Francisco Caramelo ◽  
Teofilo Yan ◽  
Carolina Figueiredo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Rejection ◽  
Kidney Transplant ◽  
Graft Survival ◽  
Graft Failure ◽  
Graft Function ◽  
Delayed Graft Function ◽  
First Year ◽  
Kidney Transplant Recipients ◽  
Post Transplant

Abstract Background and Aims As kidney transplants are growing in absolute numbers, so are patients with failed allografts and thus potential candidates for re-transplantation. Re-transplantation is challenging due to immunological barriers, surgical difficulties and clinical complexities but it has been proven that successful second transplantation improves life expectancy over dialysis. It is important to evaluate re-transplantation outcomes since 20% of patients on the waiting list are waiting for a second graft. Our aim was to compare major clinical outcomes such as acute rejection, graft and patient survival, between patients receiving a first or a second kidney transplant. Method We performed a retrospective study, that included 1552 patients submitted to a first (N=1443, 93%) or a second kidney transplant (N=109, 7%), between January 2008 and December 2018. Patients with more than 2 grafts or multi-organ transplant were excluded. Demographic, clinical and histocompatibility characteristics of both groups were registered from our unit database and compared. Delayed graft function was defined has the need of dialysis in the first week post-transplant. All acute rejection episodes were biopsy proven, according to Banff 2017 criteria. Follow-up time was defined at 1st June 2020 for functioning grafts or at graft failure (including death with a functioning graft). Results Recipients of a second graft were significantly younger (43 ±12 vs 50 ± 13 years old, p<0.001) and there were significantly fewer expanded-criteria donors in the second transplant group (31.5% vs 57.5%, p<0.001). The waiting time for a second graft was longer (63±50 vs 48±29 months, p=0.011). HLA mismatch was similar for both groups but PRA was significantly higher for second KT patients (21.6±25% versus 3±9%; p<0.001). All patients submitted to a second KT had thymoglobulin as induction therapy compared to 16% of the first KT group (p<0.001). We found no difference in primary dysfunction or delayed graft function between groups. Acute rejection was significantly more frequent in second kidney transplant recipients (19% vs 5%, p<0.001), being 10 acute cellular rejections, 7 were antibody mediated and 3 were borderline changes. For the majority of the patients (85%), acute rejection occurred in the first-year post-transplant. Death censored graft failure occurred in 236 (16.4%) patients with first kidney transplant and 25 (23%) patients with a second graft, p=0.08. Survival analysis showed similar graft survival for both groups (log-rank p=0.392). We found no difference in patients’ mortality at follow up for both groups. Conclusion Although second graft patients presented more episodes of biopsy proven acute rejection, especially at the first-year post-transplant, we found no differences in death censored graft survival or patients’ mortality for patients with a second kidney transplant. Second transplants should be offered to patients whenever feasible.

scholarly journals Effectiveness of Valganciclovir 900mg Versus 450mg for Cytomegalovirus Prophylaxis in Renal Transplantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2017 ◽  
Vol 20 ◽  
pp. 168 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wang Xin ◽  
Yang Hui ◽  
Zhang Xiaodong ◽  
Cui Xiangli ◽  
Wang Shihui ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Transplantation ◽  
Acute Rejection ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Opportunistic Infections ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Renal Transplant Recipients ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Allograft Loss ◽  
Cmv Disease

Objectives: Valganciclovir 900 mg/day is approved for cytomegalovirus (CMV) prophylaxis, but 450 mg/day is seems also effective. We systematically reviewed the efficacy and safety of low-dose versus high-dose valganciclovir prophylaxis in renal transplantation recipients. Methods: An electronic search was conducted up to November 29, 2016. The primary outcomes were incidences of CMV, CMV disease, mortality and opportunistic infection. The second outcomes were acute rejection, allograft loss, adverse drug reaction (ADR). Results: 7 cohort studies, all with high quality involving (1431 patients) were included. There was no significant difference of the incidence of following CMV disease (1271 patients, odds ratio [OR] 0.74, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.38-1.43, p=0.36), acute rejection (1343 patients, OR 0.77, 95%CI 0.53-1.14, p=0.19), allograft loss (1271 patients, OR 0.64, 95%CI 0.31-1.35, p=0.24), mortality (1271 patients, OR 0.55, 95%CI 0.20-1.47, p=0.23) and opportunistic infections (OI) (985 patients, OR 0.76, 95%CI 0.52-1.10, p=0.14) between the low-dose and the high-dose valganciclovir  prophylaxis. And no significant difference was observed for premature valganciclovir discontinuation (1010 patients, OR 0.81, 95%CI 0.52-1.25, p=0.33) and the incidence of leukopenia (1082 patients, OR 0.65, 95%CI 0.34-1.22, p=0.18) between the two regimens. Conclusion: 450 mg and 900 mg doses of valganciclovir are equipotent for CMV universal prophylaxis. CMV 450 mg prophylaxis should be used for renal transplant recipients. This article is open to POST-PUBLICATION REVIEW. Registered readers (see “For Readers”) may comment by clicking on ABSTRACT on the issue’s contents page.

Association of Factor V Leiden Mutation with Delayed Graft Function, Acute Rejection Episodes and Long-term Graft Dysfunction in Kidney Transplant Recipients

2002 ◽  
Vol 87 (02) ◽  
pp. 194-198 ◽  
Author(s):  
Torsten Slowinski ◽  
Ingeborg Hauser ◽  
Birgit Vetter ◽  
Lutz Fritsche ◽  
Daniela Bachert ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Rejection ◽  
Kidney Transplant ◽  
Graft Function ◽  
Factor V Leiden ◽  
Factor V ◽  
Transplant Recipients ◽  
Graft Dysfunction ◽  
Kidney Transplant Recipients ◽  
Factor V Leiden Mutation

SummaryWe analysed whether the factor V Leiden mutation – the most common hereditary predisposing factor for venous thrombosis – is associated with early and long-term graft dysfunction after kidney transplantation in 394 Caucasian kidney transplant recipients. The presence of factor V Leiden mutation was identified by allele specific PCR. The prevalence of the factor V Leiden mutation was compared to 32216 unselected neonates. The prevalence of the factor V Leiden mutation (GA genotype) was similar in 394 kidney transplant recipients and 32216 neonates. The frequency of known factors predicting long-term graft function were similar in patients with the GA genotype and with the normal factor V gene (GG genotype). The GA genotype was associated with the occurrence of no primary graft function (risk: 2.87; 95% confidence interval: 1.01-8.26; p < 0.05), the number of dialysis after transplantation in patients with no primary graft function until graft function (7.5 ± 2.06 dialysis in GA patients; 4.2 ± 0.36 dialyses in GG patients; p < 0.05), and the risk for at least one acute rejection episode (risk: 3.83; 95% confidence interval: 1.38-10.59; p < 0.02). The slope of 1/creatinine per year was significantly lower in patients with the GA genotype (GA patients: – 0.0204 ± 0.008 dl/mg per year; GG patients: 0.0104 ± 0.004 dl/mg per year; p < 0.02). The annual enhancement of the daily protein excretion rate was elevated in patients with the GA genotype (GA patients: 38.5 ± 16.6 mg/24 h per year; GG patients: 4.9 ± 4.4 mg/24 h per year; p < 0.02). Our study showed that the factor V Leiden mutation is associated with the occurrence of delayed graft function, acute rejection episodes and chronic graft dysfunction after kidney transplantation.

scholarly journals La terapia immunosoppressiva nel trapianto di rene

2019 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 192-196
Author(s):  
Aris Tsalouchos ◽  
Maurizio Salvadori
Keyword(s):  
Kidney Transplantation ◽  
Renal Transplantation ◽  
Acute Rejection ◽  
Immunosuppressive Therapy ◽  
Kidney Transplant ◽  
Induction Therapy ◽  
Immunosuppressive Agents ◽  
Oral Prednisone ◽  
Kidney Transplant Recipients ◽  
Optimal Maintenance

Immunosuppressive therapy in renal transplantation Immunosuppressive therapy in renal transplantation can be distinguished in induction therapy and maintenance therapy. Induction therapy is an intense immunosuppressive therapy administered at the time of kidney transplantation to reduce the risk of acute allograft rejection. In general, the induction immunosuppressive strategies used at kidney transplant centers fall into one of these two categories. One strategy relies upon high doses of conventional immunosuppressive agents, while the other utilizes antibodies directed against T-cell antigens in combination with lower doses of conventional agents. Maintenance immunosuppressive therapy is administered to almost all kidney transplant recipients to help prevent acute rejection and loss of the renal allograft. Although an adequate level of immunosuppression is required to dampen the immune response to the allograft, the level of chronic immunosuppression is decreased over time (as the risk of acute rejection decreases) to help lower the overall risk of infection and malignancy; these risks directly correlate with the degree of overall immunosuppression. The optimal maintenance immunosuppressive therapy in kidney transplantation is not established. The major immunosuppressive agents that are available in various combination regimens are glucocorticoids (primarily oral prednisone), azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPS), cyclosporine (in non-modified or modified [microemulsion] form), Tacrolimus, everolimus, rapamycin (sirolimus), and Belatacept.

scholarly journals Predictors of Hyperuricemia after Kidney Transplantation: Association with Graft Function

Medicina ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 56 (3) ◽  
pp. 95
Author(s):  
Inese Folkmane ◽  
Lilian Tzivian ◽  
Elizabete Folkmane ◽  
Elina Valdmane ◽  
Viktorija Kuzema ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Serum Uric Acid Level ◽  
Graft Function ◽  
Calcineurin Inhibitors ◽  
Oxidase Inhibitor ◽  
Male Gender ◽  
Kidney Graft ◽  
Kidney Transplant Recipients ◽  
Effect Modifier ◽  
Xanthine Oxidase Inhibitor ◽  
Factors Associated

Background and objectives: In kidney transplant recipients (KTR), hyperuricemia (HU) is a commonly-observed phenomenon, due to calcineurin inhibitors and reduced kidney graft function. Factors predicting HU, and its association with graft function, remains equivocal. Materials and Methods: We conducted a retrospective longitudinal study to assess factors associated with HU in KTR, and to determine risk factors associated with graft function, measured as glomerular filtration rate (GFR). Moreover, GFR > 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 was considered normal. HU was defined as a serum uric acid level of > 416 μmol/L (4.70 mg/dL) in men and >357 μmol/L (4.04 mg/dL) in women, or xanthine-oxidase inhibitor use. We built multiple logistic regression models to assess predictors of HU in KTR, as well as the association of demographic, clinical, and biochemical parameters of patients with normal GFR after a three-year follow-up. We investigated the effect modification of this association with HU. Results: There were 144 patients (mean age 46.6 ± 13.9), with 42.4% of them having HU. Predictors of HU in KTR were the presence of cystic diseases (OR = 9.68 (3.13; 29.9)), the use of diuretics (OR = 4.23 (1.51; 11.9)), and the male gender (OR = 2.45 (1.07; 5.56)). Being a younger age, of female gender, with a normal BMI, and the absence of diuretic medications increased the possibility of normal GFR. HU was the effect modifier of the association between demographic, clinical, and biochemical factors and a normal GFR. Conclusions: Factors associated with HU in KTR: Presence of cystic diseases, diuretic use, and male gender. HU was the effect modifier of the association of demographic, clinical, and biochemical factors to GFR.

Hypothermic Machine Perfusion in DCD Kidney Transplantation: A Single Center Experience

2015 ◽  
Vol 96 (2) ◽  
pp. 148-151 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liyu Yao ◽  
Honglan Zhou ◽  
Yuantao Wang ◽  
Gang Wang ◽  
Weigang Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Kidney Transplantation ◽  
Graft Function ◽  
Postoperative Recovery ◽  
Donation After Cardiac Death ◽  
Machine Perfusion ◽  
Transplant Recipients ◽  
Kidney Transplant Recipients ◽  
Single Center Experience ◽  
Hypothermic Machine Perfusion ◽  
Significant Difference

Introduction: Donation after cardiac death (DCD) began in 2011 after the program hosted by the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University in China. The aim of this study is to report on our experience regarding the method of preserving donated kidneys for DCD kidney transplantation. Material and Methods: A total of 37 donors and 73 primary kidney transplant recipients during the period 2011-2014 in the Urology Center of the First Hospital of Jilin University were enrolled in the study. Recipients were assigned to traditional static cold storage (SCS) group and hypothermic machine perfusion (HMP) group based on the preservation environment of donated kidneys after organ harvest. Clinical data were collected for each group. Result: The HMP group had a lower rate of delayed graft function (DGF), better postoperative recovery and kidney function compared with that of SCS group. There is no significant difference in postoperative rejection incidence between the 2 groups. Conclusions: DCD kidneys stored by hypothermic machine contribute to a lower rate of DGF and promoted the rehabilitation progress.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document