scholarly journals Effect of Psychological Distress on the Association of Workplace Social Capital with Presenteeism and Sickness Absence

2021 ◽  
Vol 43 (3) ◽  
pp. 293-303
Author(s):  
Miho OMORI ◽  
Tomohisa NAGATA ◽  
Masako NAGATA ◽  
Yoshihisa FUJINO ◽  
Koji MORI
2017 ◽  
Vol 46 (3) ◽  
pp. 290-296 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne-Sophie K. Hansen ◽  
Ida E. H. Madsen ◽  
Sannie Vester Thorsen ◽  
Ole Melkevik ◽  
Jakob Bue Bjørner ◽  
...  

Aims: Most previous prospective studies have examined workplace social capital as a resource of the individual. However, literature suggests that social capital is a collective good. In the present study we examined whether a high level of workplace aggregated social capital (WASC) predicts a decreased risk of individual-level long-term sickness absence (LTSA) in Danish private sector employees. Methods: A sample of 2043 employees (aged 18–64 years, 38.5% women) from 260 Danish private-sector companies filled in a questionnaire on workplace social capital and covariates. WASC was calculated by assigning the company-averaged social capital score to all employees of each company. We derived LTSA, defined as sickness absence of more than three weeks, from a national register. We examined if WASC predicted employee LTSA using multilevel survival analyses, while excluding participants with LTSA in the three months preceding baseline. Results: We found no statistically significant association in any of the analyses. The hazard ratio for LTSA in the fully adjusted model was 0.93 (95% CI 0.77–1.13) per one standard deviation increase in WASC. When using WASC as a categorical exposure we found a statistically non-significant tendency towards a decreased risk of LTSA in employees with medium WASC (fully adjusted model: HR 0.78 (95% CI 0.48–1.27)). Post hoc analyses with workplace social capital as a resource of the individual showed similar results. Conclusions: WASC did not predict LTSA in this sample of Danish private-sector employees.


2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johan Høy Jensen ◽  
Theis Lange ◽  
Esben Meulengracht Flachs ◽  
Janne Skakon ◽  
Naja Hulvej Rod ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 328-333 ◽  
Author(s):  
Reiner Rugulies ◽  
Peter Hasle ◽  
Jan Hyld Pejtersen ◽  
Birgit Aust ◽  
Jakob Bue Bjorner

BMJ Open ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (12) ◽  
pp. e022569 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hisashi Eguchi ◽  
Akizumi Tsutsumi ◽  
Akiomi Inoue ◽  
Hiroyuki Hikichi ◽  
Ichiro Kawachi

ObjectivesWorkplace social capital (WSC) is increasingly recognised as a social contextual determinant of workers’ mental health, but longitudinal data are sparse. We aimed to evaluate the impact of changes in unit-level WSC on psychological distress among Japanese employees using a prospective multilevel repeated-measures design.Participants and study designWe conducted a 2-year prospective cohort study with 1,944 men and 786 women aged 18–65 years. Participants worked at two manufacturing worksites in Japan and were free from mental illness from the first to third study waves. We used a three-level multilevel regression design to evaluate the prospective association of unit-level WSC with individual-level psychological distress. WSC was measured using a validated six-item instrument and individual-level psychological distress with the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K6).ResultsThe null model indicated a significant degree of between-work unit variation in psychological distress (intraclass correlation=0.1%, p<0.001). In the full model, each SD increase in unit-level WSC was associated with 0.69 point improvement in K6 scores (95% CI −1.12 to −0.26).ConclusionsThis prospective study builds on existing knowledge by showing an association between unit-level WSC and modest improvements in mental health among employees in Japan. We recommend that WSC is considered alongside other contextual influences when assessing employees’ mental health risks.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document